Got news?   tips@destructoid.com  |  Never miss a story:   RSS + Twitter + YouTube
Hey! New here? Destructoid is a gaming discussion community, updated nearly every 20 minutes. Make a quick avatar to comment and enter our contests. Take the tour!

 


Home Real Time Strategy updates

Review scraps: Universe at War: Earth Assault

7:38 PM on 07.06.2008, Brad Nicholson 19 comments

Review scraps: Universe at War: Earth Assault photo
     Real Time Strategy

[Welcome to Review Scraps. It's like what Nick does with the news we missed, but covers reviews that didn't quite make it at launch. Some of you might find that pointless, but screw you! Debuting in our Review Scraps is Universe At War: Earth Assault. Enjoy, or not. Screw you! - Jim Sterling]

There are a few very distinct arguments that one could make as to why the real-time strategy genre will never be able to succeed on the console platform. The mouse and keyboard interface makes the basics of collecting troops, hotkeys, and micromanagement a fairly simple endeavor. The gorilla in the room with console RTS titles is finding that balance between the button and analog stick that allows players the freedom of navigation as well as the precision required for the genre. The fact that no developer has quite managed to create an excellent console RTS speaks to the feat that is required to do such a thing.

Universe at War: Earth Assault, at least, feels like a different approach. Players will be able to smell what could have been if the porting endeavor would have gone over more smoothly. Universe serves as a reminder as what not to do and what should be brought to the table when it comes developing a RTS for a console.

Click on and allow me to explain.

America, yay!

Universe at War: Earth Assault (Xbox 360)
Developed by Petroglyph
Published by Sega

Released on March 25, 2008

Universe has an exceedingly rough campaign mode. The story is a bit like Independence Day, minus Will Smith and the cigar-in-the-mouth celebratory punch. An alien race called the Hierarchy has invaded Earth looking for raw materials. The Hierarchy is wildly advanced compared to the humans' meager abilities, and easily begins chewing up the entire planet. Thankfully, a race of very nice alien A.I., the Novus, whose goal in life is to consistently intervene with the Hierarchy’s plans, decide to mix it up on Earth as well. The third race, the Masari, is introduced through some story mechanics later on in the game, which frankly, I forgot already.

Forgetting about the campaign is probably what Petroglyph wanted us to do anyway. The dialogue is absolutely atrocious and borders on what a four-year-old could conjure up amidst playing with Transformer figurines. The progression of the narrative is just as weak, if not magically retrofitted to flow the succession of increased weaponry and a new race every five missions. The stepping-stones of the missions are not as fluid as they should be considering the jointed nature of Universe. The first few missions of a new campaign are always the easy affairs of guiding troops to yellow rings, but the endgame is often a thrusting of the wildly diverse tech trees and units in a frenzied battle.

One of the things Universe gets right is the balance and uniqueness of the three races. The Novus may look like a failed abortion between the Terran and Protoss, but they do possess some unique features. They’re a fast race, dependent upon their infrastructure and tech upgrades. The Hierarchy are probably the coolest innovation in the game. Because of their slow speed, the race is relies upon its ability to produce troops while engaged in battle. They do this through massive machines that serve as both an offensive unit, as well as a barracks. The Misari are a more traditional race with the unique ability to change between light and dark mode. Light mode promotes offensive capabilities, while the dark mode brings out the defense. This race relies on its ability to stay at its base and refine its tech trees and building materials.

Novus rockets, ahoy!

The balance doesn’t matter when the races can’t be controlled fluidly, though. Petroglyph made a decent attempt at creating a control scheme that would work with the Xbox 360, but it falls flat on its face anytime the action gets fast. Hotkeys are abundant, but remembering what the hell the various buttons are supposed to do gets tedious. Also, the differentiation of the menus brought up when trying to toggle groupings or find a builder leaves much to be desired. The little icons are entirely too mundane and can often lead to inexact decisions. Manually selecting groups is not an easy affair either, especially when airborne units are factored into the equation. Instead of a cursor, players have to deal with a green bubble that lacks any sort of precision.

Wonky controls aside, the A.I. of Universe lacks any sort of intuition that is required when missing a mouse. Enemies can walk right through a player’s line of defense, without the smallest hint of laser fire. If an enemy actually decides to attack a unit that isn’t a hero unit, then the majority of the time it is up to the player to tell the friendly unit to fire back. Some of the more hilariously bad scenarios in the game involve watching enemy units shuffle back and forth relentlessly between environmental objects, never even pausing as an entire assaulting force swings by to nuke their base.

The pathfinding in the game has troubles as well. Units will get stuck on buildings frequently, or run the most indirect, ridiculous route possible to a location. This fundamental problem is probably tied into how terrible the game performs. Universe acts like Starcraft on the Nintendo 64. It is slow to begin with, but anytime there are more than twenty units on the screen at once, it becomes completely ruddy and practically unplayable at points.  This is triple the issue over Live as well. The game will run fine and smooth until it's time for that collision in the middle of the field. Dropped connections or players are par for the course when a game performs this terribly.

It was a firefight

It only gets worse when it comes to the graphical quality. Cut-scenes are completely slapped on, including pre-rendered backgrounds. The lip-synching with the portraits is by far one of the worst attempts out there. The real evil comes with troop differentiation. Every infantryman looks the same with the Xbox 360 version of Universe, which makes grabbing specific troops a major fiasco and is ultimately a serious detriment to simply playing the game. Everything is brutally small and unattractive, and zooming in with the camera is like putting a particularly ugly set of blinders on.  In fact, the prettiest thing about Universe is the boxart, and that's only because it's not in-engine.

There is a multiplayer mode with several features and ideas, but it is rendered irrelevant because the game is barely playable online. There is also an ability to play against PC players in Universe, but stay away. Their machines are not going to be chugging the way the Xbox 360 version does. It really is unfortunate that multiplayer is so hindered. The campaign often strips the majority of abilities away from the game, making it hobbled. The one respite could have been online multiplayer, if it wasn’t as broken as the rest of the game.

Overall, Universe at War: Earth Assault is a below average experience in any capacity. While I applaud Petroglyph in their effort to make a RTS playable on a console, I cannot let go of the various misgivings of the game. The bad menus, controls, unplayable online component, and terrible campaign mode completely shroud any real accomplishments made in terms of the game's balance and feel. If you’re a RTS fan and have the inability to play on a PC, my suggestion is to keep waiting for HaloWars. At least that game is being built from the ground up for a console.

Score: 4.0 – (Shows promise, but falls over its own feet entirely too much to be a title that you should consider playing.)

 


Next page: More Reviews stories




Mozgus's Avatar
Mozgus at 07/06/2008 19:24
Maybe I'm blind but you didn't say anything about the soundtrack, which is probably the best thing about the game.
The Bez's Avatar
The Bez at 07/06/2008 19:25
Is this game any better on the PC?
Professor Pew's Avatar
Professor Pew at 07/06/2008 19:42
I liked it on the PC, but this game is one of the most insane micro-intensive RTS's out there. I can't even imagine how you are supposed to manage the Asari with the Light/Dark mode AND all the unit specific 'spells' with the gamepad.
Redzie's Avatar
Redzie at 07/06/2008 20:03
Port this to PS3, allow mouse support and I will love this game.
Zatsuga's Avatar
Zatsuga at 07/06/2008 20:07
The demo was pretty terrible, so I'm not surprised.
JavTheGreat's Avatar
JavTheGreat at 07/06/2008 20:48
I enjoyed this game on the pc.
Brad Nicholson's Avatar
Brad Nicholson at 07/06/2008 20:50
@The Bez - Yeah, it's supposed to be pretty good.

@Professor Pew - Yeah, and that's the biggest problem really. There are a billion powers and tech fundamentals in the game. It takes forever to actually differentiate what they are and then use. Hell, by the time you actually get some missiles launched, your base is already destroyed and/or the game lagged out. Whichever.
Jetsetlemming's Avatar
Jetsetlemming at 07/06/2008 21:09
Hahahahaha fail



(I don't even like rts)
Velt's Avatar
Velt at 07/06/2008 21:32
In the PC is solid, but thats it. Nothing incredible, if you dont have any other RTS go for it and waste some time, as he says the game is a rent.
Roryzilla's Avatar
Roryzilla at 07/07/2008 00:21
Meh, i found it even on the pc to be slightly below average.
Im OK's Avatar
Im OK at 07/07/2008 04:38
Can't say anything about the 360 version, but I thought the PC version was pretty good. Shame the console version apparently sucks, but then, it's been my experience that pretty much all console ports of PC RTS games suck.

Also, nb4 Twilight Princess.
AaronLindes Neighbor's Avatar
AaronLindes Neighbor at 07/07/2008 11:37
@ brad

I assume this plays more poorly than the recently released update of Command and Conquer: Kanes wrath?

i.e. "stand alone expansion"

Thanks for saving me from wasting a rental.
Eschatos's Avatar
Eschatos at 07/08/2008 17:56
I'm pretty sure that Halo Wars will be the only good console RTS.
TheDreadHawk's Avatar
TheDreadHawk at 07/08/2008 23:05
Jetsetlemming

Don't say something fails when you don't even like the genre.

I played it once, waaaay too much to micro-manage, which is something I dislike at times. I prefer to have something more simple; even Civilization IV has less to manage, I felt that makes you manage a pretty big load of stuff.
mistic's Avatar
mistic at 07/09/2008 13:49
great that I read this, I was thinking about getting it, but wasn't sure about the controls, now that doubt has been lifted :-)
prev next

Returning Dtoiders: login now to post a comment

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just Create an avatar now - it's fast and free: PLUS you also get your own gaming blog and begin posting stories and uploading videos in our open community area that may also appear on our home page. Sign up and we'll guide you through it, it's easy and 100% anonymous.




 Original Videos

 Reviews
Mad Dog McCree Gunslinger Pack
Overlord II
Yosumin Live!
Let's Tap
Ghostbusters: The Video Game (Wii)
View all Game Reviews

 Community blogs -   39782 Dtoiders!

This month's theme: Untapped Potential

New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide


 Originals

How Pokemon Red is blatantly better than Pokemon Blue











more original Destructoid stories



 Popular now more













Destructoid is:
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Dale North
News Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Video editor & director
Niero
Founder, publisher
Letters to the editors
tips@destructoid.com
Associate Editors
Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
Dyson Samit Sarkar
Contributors
Adam Dork
Ben Perlee
Daniel Lingen
Joseph Leray
Joe Burling
Mikey
Will Maddock
Stella Wong




get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
discuss a review
contribute a news tip
write a guest editorial
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meet-ups
seriously

about us
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006