http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/jimquisition/5709-Videogames-Are-A-Luxury
i only buy 1-2 games in a year, that's both new and used, and all my money goes to paying for college, transportation, phone bills, groceries, and other essentials.
I have just as much a right to entertainment as anyone else, and I always make buying games my lowest priority. It all comes from scrimps and scramps i save up over months.
Plus, I can't help if I don't have a great job. I apply for many jobs every day, I just do not get called back. Not my fault.
I understand you both live in a perfect little bubble where you can just tell everyone else how to solve their problems and it's their own fault if they can't buy certain things, but it's no reason to proclaim anyone is an "idiot" when they do not have the means to purchase this or that game and then flame them for pointing out the rudeness of that comment.
Decisions, decisions...
Part of Portal (and Portal 2, to a bit lesser extent) was that any damn one could play the thing, due to Source Engine and scalability. QC only has darkness (tint?), resolution, and volumes. Not quite what I need if I want to hit these platforming without compensating.
if it's a 10 i really need to know why; I am not discrediting the reviewer but even the description of what happens in this game was very vague...
doesn't anybody else feel the same way?
I really want to report him for the scam he is spamming about sister in laws making money on their laptops.
The writing isn't that good. The game (environments) could definitely look a lot better. The introduction is pretty weak too.
The only thing I will say is that this: "It almost seems wrong to enjoy a $15 title this much. Quantum Conundrum has more polish and charm than most full-price retail releases, and it plays just as well."
An awful lot does that. I sincerely hope you've never been the kind of trog to write something off because it doesn't come in a box and was using that as just a figure of speech...
Either way, I'll be picking this bad boy up, no doubt.
I feel like Jim Sterling's contrarian attitude is rubbing off on the entire staff.
A bit too much of manipulating boxes for my liking, nowhere near as sophisticated as Portal 2 in any way.
Still very much worth checking out!
Basically to get the game to run well on an older PC, go to [game's program directory (where the game .exe is)]>Engine>Config, and then open the Base Engine.ini, and search for System Settings using the Find command.
Then set Dynamic Shadows and Ambient Occlusion to False, and set MaxAnisotropy and MaxMultisamples to 1. Further down you can change the resolution, look for ResX and ResY.
You can copy my Base Engine.ini file contents from here:
http://pastebin.com/mZgJekDU
There's also a "Allow mature language" setting, which I've set to True, no idea if it makes a difference, haven't heard any mature language yet, sadly.
Also, set the brightness from the in-game settings, it was far too bright in my case.
Rather than merely describing the mechanics of the game and saying how "amazing" it is, let's be critical here.
The game is short (roughly six hours, and I did a pretty thorough run through). Not only that, but it takes awhile to get challenge (which makes its short length all the more problematic). Professor Quadwrangle is entertaining, but he has to be compared to GLaDOS, Wheatley and Cave Johnson. He's nowhere near as memorable or charismatic as they are. Also, the game ends VERY abruptly and the final area is anti-climatic. It's far from the most challenging set of puzzles.
Again, I really enjoyed the game but this review is a joke.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow



-620x.jpg)
-620x.jpg)
-620x.jpg)
-620x.jpg)















follow


