As much as I would want that, a desktop version of this PC should be around 1,000 dollars less.
But for that price, you could build the mightiest desktop you could ever need.
My "gaming" laptop cost $1000 and, while it's not amazing by any stretch, it can handle even modern games at decent settings, and the smaller screen of a laptop means you don't notice how crappy the graphics are ;P.
What idiot would buy this thing? This laptop has 2 MASSIVE bottlenecks that basically bring this monster of a laptop to that of a regular $1200 laptop.
I take offense that they offer that kind of RAM with this laptop. So sad using 1333 speed, simply pathetic. Not to mention 8gb is pretty small for such an extreme price. It is equally depressing that they can't even throw in an SSD. 7200 RPM speed??? REALLY! Not even a 10,000 RPM Raptor drive? Such outdated technology. Since this is a laptop, you are stuck with that silly drive that moves like molasses. Just sucks. Nobody should buy this, giving the company a message to please build a legit gaming laptop if you want people to spend $2300.
I've also never once encountered a laptop where the user couldn't replace the hard drive.
Yeah, only with the core components that are most crucial to gaming performance. *head/desk*
Congratulations on successfully making a point nobody was arguing against in the first place. Bonus points for being smarmy about it. Jesus, I like that Destructoid is doing these PC articles sometimes nowadays but I can't fucking stand reading the comments and seeing this elitist bullshit mentality some people have.
"I stand by laptops. I'm always on the move, and a desktop would be utterly impractical. I don't need to lug a giant monitor around with me everywhere, and I can carry my whole life in just a few bags."
Are you gearing up for Judgment Day, or... ?
Nice review, though. Comments are pretty disheartening but watcha gonna do.
Smarmy is my specialty. But you're right, I did take his comment a bit out of context.
@Daniel:
Sorry if that came off harsh, and I see what you were saying now. The way it was worded I thought you were making a broader statement.
I have a kind of oddball sense of humor and sarcasm... sometimes it comes off too harsh online.
I don't think you really maxed out Skyrim and played it at a silky smooth sixty frames.
And even if you did, even if a $2500 laptop really does deliver, one.has to wonder how long it would last under that load. If you burn out a power supply on a custom tower it is no problem to replace it. Not so on a laptop.
I just love paraphrasing.
Long story short though, even though I've finally managed to 'see the light' as far as desktops are concerned, I completely agree with you on the laptop front.
Also, those graphs really are irrelevant, at 16x AA, 16x Anisotropic filtering, max textures, shadows, vsync, etc. It held at 60. That's the graph. A straight line.
"Also, those graphs really are irrelevant, at 16x AA, 16x Anisotropic filtering, max textures, shadows, vsync, etc. It held at 60. That's the graph. A straight line."
You could not be more wrong about this, and to me it demonstrates that you don't really understand the point of a PC hardware review. When you spend $2,500 on a laptop, you want it to be future-proof. The fact that it can run current games at 60 FPS with vsync on gives zero indication of how well it will hold up two or three years down the line. (Hint: vsync caps the framerate.)
Your review is not terrible and you did a good job describing the physical and perceptual characteristics of the machine. However, you provided almost no actual *data* about the performance and how it compares to cheaper machines available from other manufacturers, which makes your recommendation suspect to say the least.
People go into purchases with different expectations, wants and desires. Not everyone cares about something being future-proof. A lot of people do, but you're still making an assumption.
That said, we are paying attention to feedback and will try to respond to these in future review (and there's quite a few coming up soon). For my part, I will include more technical data, but try and keep the tone casual and pragmatic. We specifically tried to avoid using tons of numbers because we thought readers wouldn't care and wouldn't want them anyway.

surf dtoid with 






Rising (10+)
People you follow






































follow


