Quantcast
Destructoid Japanator Tomopop Flixist
Dtoid Forums now support TapATalk and ForumRunner on your iOS/Android devices. Whoot.

Review: NeverDead

2:00 PM on 02.08.2012   |   Jim Sterling

Review: NeverDead photo

When creating a videogame protagonist with a particular super power, there's an extra responsibility to create a challenging, rewarding sense of balance. If your hero has enhanced strength and speed, how do you keep enemy opponents threatening without undermining the player's advantages? If your character cannot die, what elements can be introduced in order to maintain a believable conflict? 

NeverDead is a game that does not ask these questions. In fact, it uses the invincibility of its protagonist as an excuse to cut corners and ignore even the most basic factors of game balance. After sitting through the end credits of NeverDead, I am proud to say I did something that developer Rebellion did not do ...

I finished the game.

NeverDead (PS3, Xbox 360 [reviewed])
Developer: Rebellion Developments
Publisher: Konami
Released: January 31, 2012 
MSRP: $59.99

NeverDead's central premise revolves around a demon hunter named Bryce who cannot die. As the 500-year-old victim of a demonic curse, Bryce's physical form can be wounded, eviscerated and decapitated, but it cannot be destroyed. Should Bryce be blown apart, he can pull himself together. If he loses a limb entirely, he can grow a new one. 

It's a novel concept for a videogame, and the core idea of a temporarily destructible protagonist paves the way for all sorts of clever challenges and level design. Rebellion decided to take none of those paths, settling instead on repetitive combat against a handful of skittering monsters. While the occasional fresh idea surfaces, the vast majority of the game is spent in tepid combat with the same stock enemies that are regularly regurgitated from beginning to end. Much of the experience literally does not change over the course of five hours. 

Bryce is able to acquire a number of traditional guns, ranging from vanilla pistols to standard grenade launchers that can be dual-wielded in any combination. At the touch of a button, he can switch between firearms to a sword, which is awkwardly controlled via the right analog stick as opposed to face buttons. Although the sluggish input means that swordplay feels unwieldy and unreliable, it is typically the weapon of choice, since basic firearms are pathetically weak against most enemies. 

Combat is a crude, sloppy, disjointed mess. There's a horrible lag to the camera that sees it stick for a while before swinging wildly, and Bryce moves as if the floor is made of soapy ice. The enemies fly in from all corners with such speed that it's impossible to do anything but hack and slash blindly while hoping something gets hit. Most of the time, it'll be Bryce who takes the damage, since enemies are faster and quicker to attack than he is. This seems to have been done on purpose, just to shove the limb-shredding gimmick down our throats. 

As far as the limb shredding goes, what starts as a cute little stunt quickly becomes a tiresome, grueling endeavor. The ironic upshot of an invincible character who can be torn apart is that Bryce is one of the flimsiest, weakest protagonists a videogame has ever had. Almost every single hit will have an arm, a leg, or a head come flying off. There's no sense of procedural damage in NeverDead -- it's pot luck as to which limb gets lost, and Bryce will have to perform a dodge roll over the severed body part in order to re-attach it -- though reattachment often doesn't happen, because nothing quite works right in this game. If players are lucky enough to keep a limb, our hero will instead hit the floor like a ragdoll, leaving him prone just long enough for another attack to sever something. 

Should Bryce's head become detached, it can be manually rolled around, and players will either have to trundle toward Bryce's neck to rejoin the torso, or wait for a while and regrow a new body. As just a head, Bryce is prone to a "death" of sorts. Small demonic creatures known as Grandbabies patrol the levels, and they can consume body parts. Should they swallow Bryce's head, players have to beat a simple, one-button quick-time-event in order to escape, otherwise he'll be stuck in the digestive tract of a monster forever. 

With Bryce becoming decapitated roughly once a minute and shedding other body parts with more regularity, the core premise outstays its welcome long before the adventure is over. The game is never "challenging" in a traditional sense, since Bryce cannot die and escaping a Grandbaby's stomach is easy. However, because of this, Rebellion thought it was okay to ignore proper game balance or even stop the game during a cutscene (you can be attacked, torn apart, and swallowed by a demon off-camera while cutscenes play, because nobody bothered to pause the action). Dodging doesn't dodge anything, blocking is a pointless endeavor given the volume and speed of incoming attacks, and there are many moments where players will ostensibly feel like a tennis ball, shunted around the floor after being ripped to bits. However, apparently it's okay to have combat that lacks even basic refinement, so long as the player cannot die. 

Every fight, no matter how insurmountable, will be beaten through sheer attrition. So long as the player has the mental willpower to keep regrowing limbs every few seconds, there is no battle that cannot be won. It might take half an hour to beat a section that contains less than a minute of actual gameplay, but it will be won so long as you stick with it. Never before has a game's unique idea been exploited to so blatantly get away with lazy design. 

Every now and then, Bryce can exploit his immortality for an advantage. He can set himself or fire or electrocute himself, turning his body into a conduit for burning and paralyzing foes. That's all he can do, though. Rebellion had that one idea, threw it in at the most basic level, and left it at that. This happens to be one of NeverDead's biggest problems -- having ideas, but not following them through and evolving them into something truly exceptional. 

Although most of the game is spent pretending to be a poor man's Serious Sam, there are quieter moments where NeverDead has the audacity to attempt environmental puzzles. Bryce can pull off his own head, as well as his arms, and he can use these abilities to interact with otherwise unreachable objects, or reach high places that he couldn't traditionally jump to. As with everything else in NeverDead, there are hints of clever mechanics with no follow-through, so instead of engaging in clever, provocative puzzles, players will just repeatedly throw their heads into air vents or onto ledges and roll around for a bit. 

The only moments of true inspiration comes with boss battles, where there is some impressively smart design going on. One particular boss is a gigantic bug that sucks in surrounding objects, and has to be killed by yanking one's arm off, letting it get swallowed, and shooting the monster's stomach from inside. These large-scale battles sometimes border on genius but every fight is so unreasonably lengthy that whatever goodwill the innovation earned is wasted. An idea ceases to become engaging when you're asked to repeat it a dozen times in a battle that goes on three times as long as it should. It doesn't matter how inventive it is. The penultimate boss, who can regenerate health faster than Bryce can recover from his ragdoll flailing, is the ultimate slap in the face and indicative of just how little the developers care for a player's patience or time. 

Levels are littered with collectibles (imaginatively called "collectibles"), which are picked up for experience points. XP is spent on a range of skills that upgrade damage, make Bryce's limbs explode, or confer other combat properties. Ability slots are so restricted, however, that unlocking new skills becomes a waste of time. One would think that Rebellion could at least get upgrade systems right, or otherwise copy one of the hundreds of upgrade systems that have been in far better games, but no. Even something as traditional and basic as this is implemented poorly. 

All of this ridiculous nonsense is suffered while having to babysit an A.I. partner, although it's insulting to even the most basic of A.I. programs to insinuate that the "supporting" character Arcadia has any intelligence, artificial or otherwise. The character loves charging headlong into explosions, or standing in the way of oncoming trains, and players will need to keep reviving her, lest she die and create a contrived game over. Despite having a limited ability to fight, Arcadia essentially turns a vast majority of NeverDead into an escort mission. So, that's something else to hate the game for. 

It was never mentioned during the advertising campaign that NeverDead boasts an online multiplayer mode, but it does. The five-hour campaign is bolstered by several competitive and co-op challenges that range from simple survival modes to rudimentary capture-the-flag games. There are a handful of people currently playing (I'm guessing single-digit figures), but the rubbish map design and uninspired game types aren't worth hanging around in a lobby for. 

Few games are as lazy and slapdash as NeverDead, but to its credit, few games are quite so obvious about it. Even the narrative premise and monster design is honest in its desperation to be controversial and edgy like a Suda 51 game. It tries so cloyingly to ape such efforts as Shadows of the Damned or Killer7 that you can almost taste the flagrant shamelessness. From boss monsters that need to be shot in the anus to camp demons with penis-shaped noses, every attempt at humor or shock value is a cynical, convoluted attempt to remind you of better, more entertaining videogames. This is a game that understands what made titles like Devil May Cry iconic, but doesn't know what made them good

NeverDead is an embarrassment fit only for mockery. Sometimes, when I use the word ridiculous, I mean it in a positive way. With this game, I mean it with sneering contempt. NeverDead is a ridiculous videogame, one that is so clumsy, bedraggled, and neglectful that I am furious it exists, let alone carries an asking price of $59.99.

There are bad games that failed due to poor budget, ill-conceived mechanics, or a simple lack of skill, and then there are bad games like NeverDead -- that could have been good if the developers hadn't cut corners, used its innovations as excuses to get away with incompetence, and absolutely, positively, failed to give a single solitary shit about the people unlucky enough to be playing. For games like that, there is not an adequate word in the English language to vocalize my disgust.



Final Verdict:
2.0

BAD: 2s are generally awkward games that also lack originality. Any good they might have had are quickly swallowed up by glitches, poor design choices or a plethora of other issues. The desperate or the gullible may find a glimmer of fun hidden somewhere in the bargain bin pit.













More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

88 comments | showing # 1 to 50
prev
next 50 comments

Sir Tobbii's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:02
Sir Tobbii
This seems to be this year's MindJack.
Mr Andy Dixon's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:04
Mr Andy Dixon
You forgot to put the negative sign before the 2.
BoomingEchoes's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:06
BoomingEchoes
A little surprised by how low the score is, but not all that surprised that it got a low score in the first place -if that makes sense.

Game's concepts are neat but the general lack of marketing I've seen hints that Konami had either no clue how to sell it, or had next to no confidence in it, in the first place.

Problem I see with this is that people are going to shove it into "its a new IP, of course it'll be undersold" it it seems obvious that the issues here are far far greater then just "new game smell".. People wonder why we can't have nice, new, things, and one of those reasons really seem to be how little care is taken when most new IP's are developed and released.
wqerty's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:06
wqerty
60$ for 5 hours of this sh!t?
llort het's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:08
llort het
It's either a 2 or 8 with you lately, isn't it?
SirNinjaFace's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:09
SirNinjaFace
Hachi machi! Will avoid.
llort het's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:09
llort het
But seriously, like Amy, this game had potential, but it seems like they just ruined the opportunity
Ursu's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:10
Ursu
Fucking Rebellion, have they ever made a game that isn't lazy or shit? The only one I can think of is the original AvP FPS.
LibrarianMike's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:14
LibrarianMike
Are you sure the problem wasn't just that it was too hard, Jim? #Amy #neverforget
RoBoSexual's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:16
RoBoSexual
Sheesh! I saw this coming. It looked bad back at E3.
Fractur65's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:18
Fractur65
This isn't right, scoring the game a 2.0.. your not even playing it right!!







Sorry, couldn't resist. Glad I ended up reading this before wasting a GF slot to try it out.
DrRockso87's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:19
DrRockso87
When I first watched the gameplay, I thought, "Meh, could be okay as a rental." Then when I heard there would be a partner you have to protect, I immediately thought, "Oh great, another 'Knights Contract' on our hands. Yeeeeeah, no thanks."

As someone else said, a small minority will start defending this game by saying, "ZOMG!! GO PLAY UR CALL UF DOOTY, FAG!!!!!1" but from the sounds of it, this game sounds like wasted potential. Oh well.
M1chl's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:20
M1chl
Same as Alpha Protocol? Gonna try that for sure : D
Taerdin's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:21
Taerdin
Well this year sure is off to a great start...
GREENGUY's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:23
GREENGUY
Despite the reviews, I feel entitled to play this.
It's like it's calling me to play it.
Max-'s Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:23
Max-
NeverEvenGotA2.5
Smo5000's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:24
Smo5000
the gameplay always looked bad to me but I think the premise is interesting.
LloydBraun's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:24
LloydBraun
You can die during cutscenes? Seriously?
Foggle's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:24
Foggle
I actually liked DNF and Alpha Protocol, but it sounds like I should skip this one.

Surprised Rebellion is still in business tbh.
JaHawk2009's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:24
JaHawk2009
Yes! I knew it was going to be below a 3. Good review Jim. You back up your score throughout.
Janklogs's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:25
Janklogs
Pay attention, folks. In the next couple of weeks or so, Rebellion is gonna have a bitchfit.
Sterculius's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:31
Sterculius
I personally would have given this game a 5 or 6. But that's just due to my own personal tastes. I like the charm of shit. Like those horribly done low-budget horror movies, that are better for a laugh than a scare. I love those. I went out and bought this game the day it came out, and while I certainly don't disagree with the faults found in it by others, I am having a good time with it.
DreamingDarklyRobin's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:38
DreamingDarklyRobin
Hey look Amy, your not the worst game of the year anymore!
rossandgarfunkel's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:40
rossandgarfunkel
So when are we getting our PS3 firmware 4.10 review
BestUsernameEver's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:44
BestUsernameEver
Not surprised
ScottyG's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:47
ScottyG
There is not an adequate word, but an adequate number?

Bummer to hear, although given how SotD - despite being mostly great - ultimately let me down in the end I shouldn't be surprised.
mix's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:51
mix
I had very little interest in this game besides the "limb stuff" but it sounds overdone for sure.
Jinx 01's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:52
Jinx 01
Is it sad that I have so many games to play that it's almost a RELIEF when I see games bomb?!
RockWallofMight359's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 14:53
RockWallofMight359
Another 2 score. Brings back memories for Bloodrayne. At least this time you weren't bitching about poor design when the real issue was your skill level.
Dito's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:00
Dito
I knew something was fishy about this game when I saw that BestBuy had it available for sale earlier than the usual Tuesday release schedule. It's like those movies that are so bad, they're not pre-screened for critics. They want that one weekend of optimistic, uninformed customers... before the word gets out.
Archwright's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:05
Archwright
@Jinx 01 - That is kinda bad, actually.
bulletcurtain's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:14
bulletcurtain
Sounds like the "Stretch Panic" of this generation. Good idea -- bad execution.
PhilK3nS3bb3n's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:18
PhilK3nS3bb3n
Hey Alpha Protocol had fun parts and I personally looked past its flaws and enjoyed it. Jims review of that was fair. This review is also fair. Played this for an hour and said fuck it. Hut as always opinions differ.
Nick Jones's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:18
Nick Jones
*Claps.* I was waiting to see you rip this game a new one, Jim! Not that I'm happy that it's a bad game, I just had a strong feeling you weren't going to like it. That, and I read your Facebook page.

Rebellion is one of the worst developers out there. Do they even try to make a decent game anymore?
Armoured Badger's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:21
Armoured Badger
it sounded promising, but... oh well.
Hugh G Rection's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:22
Hugh G Rection
Hey, 10/10 Review for finishing the game.
scarlatch's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:28
scarlatch
This is kind of a shame. Just from reading about the game's core mechanic, it sounded really interesting and had me wanting more. Then, after reading the review, I'm just left with an empty sadness, armed with the knowledge that this game is shit but had the potential to be so much more. Ah well!
dtomek's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:30
dtomek
This sounds like a developer decided to make a statement about modern game design by trolling us with a terrible game. You might not have realized it but when you stated that a player absolutely will be able to beat any section through sheer attrition, well that's every game made today.
oknight's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:33
oknight
shame, i like most the voice actors in this. that might even be the only good part of the game.
Begaria's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:39
Begaria
Let's say my Great Aunt who desperately wants to be a part of my life decides that I should get a video game for a present. She presents with me with a choice: Neverdead or Amy. Am I legally obliged to kick her in her 85 year old droopy tits?
chemwizard's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:42
chemwizard
So.....you didn't enjoy the game then?
Naturality's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:47
Naturality
This is like DNF all over again. Jim Sterling being super harsh because he wants to be super famous and get all of the money. All of those wheelbarrows of cash which he spends on high quality Ray-bans and pulpits for his each preach-fest videos.

The government should put a stop to this kind of unfair money-centric scam that the corporations are pulling.

Thank Satan for Jim Sterling.


.
.
.
Kappa.
Scissors's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:53
Scissors
Jam Sterlong is such a drama queen. Yur jus dueing tis fur the hits. This game is rally good I already platninummed it 15 tymes.
tehTommy's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:54
tehTommy
Oh dear... such a pity.
JoeTheProYaKnow's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 15:54
JoeTheProYaKnow
@Naturality

No, NeverDead is awful. There is no hidden agenda, it is just a bad game. Period. Freaking crappy IGN even rated it a 3! A 3! IGN, home of the 8+. Duke Nukem was a totally different beast, it was a game that theoretically could be enjoyed, but required something more from the gamer who choose to play it.
BomberJacket's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 16:00
BomberJacket
Coming soon from Rebellion:

"NeverDead: Prophecy*"
- Bosses life cut by 3/4!
- Boss Rush Mode only!
- Eligible for re-review!

[i]
*NeverDead: Prophecy is a relabelling of NeverDead version 1.ohfuck. Some assembly required. Contact your physician before playing NeverDead: Prophecy as it still has been known to cause aneurysms. The Surgeon General recommends against playing NeverDead: Prophecy if you are a child or an adult.[/i]
TheLupineOne's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 16:00
TheLupineOne
When I first read that opening "burn", all i could think of was...

"This is gonna be good....."
WinterZero's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 16:01
WinterZero
My name is Bryce. I am disappoint...
Scuffles's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 16:05
Scuffles
@wqerty

$60?

Have you forgotten this steaming pile apparently already has DLC on the way :P

@Naturality

........ actually essentially every review I have read has panned the shit out of this game ~.~
Retrofraction's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/08/2012 16:11
Retrofraction
Hmmm... Well no what I thought it would be like... So much potential... awesome plot... it makes me sad
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!