Good review Jim, love your work.
Hmm. They still gave it a 7/10, but these two reviews are so different, I'm going to have to give it a try myself, methinks. I don't usually read IGN, but though this isn't the type of game I usually go for, it seems interesting.
so all 2d platformers is a mark against them? I happen to enjoy 2d platformers a ton, and Kirby is everything Jim said it was. For my taste, FPS have a mark against them in my eyes, but that doesn't mean the game isn't good, this all opinion, buddy.
This'll be the same IGN that gave Godhand a 2 and the same GameSpot that fired a man for being honest in a review.
I think I'll stick with the example *I* provided.
But they gave Vanquish an 8. Shit son, looks like nobody is reliable. Guess we'll have to stop depending on what other fuckers say and start thinking for ourselves.
I love this game so far it's freakin brilliant. Instead of bashing the review give the game a chance mute the voice overs though haha. I agree with your review entirely Jim. So far I haven't gotten far enough to encounter back tracking. I love the day and night thing. how some collectibles are only obtainable during the day and some are during the night. This will keep me occupied till Skyward Sword hits.
"Guess we'll have to stop depending on what other fuckers say and start thinking for ourselves."
I wish we still had the Fap button, because amen to that! Reviews are helpful, but at least IMHO, they are NOT cause to run out and buy a game or to reject it based on the opinion of the reviewer. Putting so much stock in a game review, seems to me, a bit silly.
"But still Jim you pick out a few individual cases and fail to look at the pattern behaviour. The problem at hand is your pattern behaviour to rate Japanese games TOO highly when you make positive reviews. Your behaviour has exibitited itself throughout many reviews like Ken's Rage, Segoku Basara and this game to name a few."
My mind is full of fuck after reading all of your comments. You say that IGN, Gamespot and Edge are better reviewers because they have a pattern not because they accurately assess games. So basically IGN is right because they're consistently forgiving and Edge is right because they're consistently harsh but Jim is wrong because he likes some games and hates others? WTF are you smoking? What does one reviewer's opinion have to do with another? Argument by comparison is a weak way to make a point anyway but your examples make absolutely no fucking sense. Try judging his reviews based on their own merit not by some other dumb fuck on another website that is forced to gloss over the negative details of certain games.
As far as Jim being biased towards Japanese games you'd know he gave Ken's Rage and Sengoku Basara good reviews because he's a Dynasty Warriors fan even though most people hate those games. You'd also know that he's a life long FF fan but had no problem shitting on FF13 for being so bad. Half the time I don't even agree with Jim but I don't get mad over his reviews especially if it's a game I HAVEN'T EVEN FUCKING PLAYED YET which is what you seem to be doing.
What credibility does Jim have to lose? Oh just because he isn't a paper-cut-out reviewer like Gamespot or IGN makes his reviews meaningless?
Look, Jim reviews games according to his own tastes. And people who share that taste trust in reviews by Jim. If he suddenly starts reviewing all games objectively, his audience won't have a reviewer that they can trust.
We don't need another IGN or Gamespot. There are already there for the people who care. Why does Jim have to please everyone? That's asking for the impossible, because if he starts reviewing games like all the other review outlets out there, then his original audience won't trust him anymore and they won't be able to find another reviewer that share their tastes.
Just because you believe what he reviews is wrong, doesn't mean everyone else thinks the same way. IGN and Gamespot aren't the lawmakers of reviews. They don't set in stone what constitutes as good qualities in a game and bad qualities. They're JUST OPINIONS. <--- OPINIONS.
Look at this example.
Say IGN and Gamespot reviewed say...Call of Duty and gave it a 10/10.
I say "Oh they gave it a good score, it must be good."
I buy it and think it sucks.
However, Jim reviews Majin and gives it a 9.5.
I buy it and I think its great.
Then I start "trusting" the reviewer who recommended me a good game. If Jim was to follow IGN's footstep, how will I ever find out that I LIKED Majin?
People have different tastes. Having a wide variety of reviewers helps people of all different tastes to get good recommendations from the reviewers they trust. If everyone was an IGN, then the people who didn't like the games that they praised have no one to look for on advice.
So, as a person who trust Jim's reviews, back the fuck away. Don't take away one of my main sources of advice when purchasing a game.
The argument for games criticism based on taste is an ridiculous one. How can we be expected to judge a review by its own merits if we can't tell of its relevance until after the fact? Furthermore, it's only a matter of time before your favourite reviewer's taste deviates from your own - is he then an unreliable reviewer? It's one thing encouraging subjectivity and diversity of opinion in this matter but to unapologetically flaunt it as a self-evident merit is tautological absurdity.
I usually trust your opinion Jim, but I wonder what made my friend hate it.
Review are made for criticism. That is the truth. The fact that people compare reviews doesn't validate the entire review process. You're telling me no one's opinion matters until it's compared to another. That's bullshit. I read reviews every day for games and movies from sources I trust. I don't always agree but I can never know for sure until I experience the thing that is being reviewed. People learn to trust certain reviewers by checking out the things they recommend and subsequently agreeing with the review not by checking the IGN score before playing to see if they're equal.
Contrary to what you might believe it is possible to read a review and still form your own opinion on a game and the review itself. Like a game a review is full of content. If you read that content and find it poorly written, exaggerated, or doesn't give an adequate representation of the content with a game you can surmise that it's a bad review. It's not all about the score at then end of it. It's about the letters on the screen.I didn't trust Jim's review of Assassin's Creed II before I played it because it was too nitpicky and made sensational claims like the graphics were worse than the original game. Once I finally played the game I hated the review even more. I can think for myself and so should you.
First you accused Jim of habitually giving Japanese games high scores. You now admit that isn't true by saying, "My point is he exaggerates his review scores for Japanese games he likes." According to what you just said Jim only gives high scores to games he likes so why bring up where they were developed? Does he give American games or European games he likes lower scores than the Japanese ones? Tell me, how the hell is someone supposed to review a game they like?
The worst part about all this is that we wouldn't be having this conversation if you actually played the game and happened to like it. You've prematurely decided the game sucks and are using the review scores on fucking IGN (even though you admit they give inaccurate scores) to back up a decision you've already made. Fine this isn't your type of game. I get that. Just don't tell me one opinion is wrong because you compared it to another site you find untrustworthy and the scores don't match. You just end up looking stupid.
I actually like that opinions do not get too homogenized about games, and I find pretty normal that some may divide players and get high and low praise reviews at the same time. This just means such games are not for everyone. I didn't like Batman AA when almost every one did: that doesn't mean this game is shit nor that my opinion is shit; just that games can be both enjoyed and hated by different people at the same time. One more thing, games do not need to be perfect to get high marks, because in the end it all comes down to this: did you enjoy your time or not with it?

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow























follow


