Quantcast

Review: MAG

11:00 AM on 01.25.2010   |   Jim Sterling

Review: MAG photo

MAG, otherwise known as Massive Action Game, has never been short of ambition. Cramming 256 players into a single FPS multiplayer match is no small task at the best of times, but doing it on home consoles is unprecedented. Nevertheless, this is what Zipper Interactive has done with MAG. 256 players on a single map, battling for control of a persistent online world. Ambition, thy name is Zipper.

As with all lofty concepts, MAG was destined to either become a technological triumph or an overzealous disaster. Having spent many hours invested in the game's huge battles, testing out all the game modes, and taking part in several gigantic matches with a full 256 players, I can now tell you which way MAG went.

Read on for the full review of Massive Action Game.

MAG (PS3)
Developer: Zipper Interactive
Publisher: Sony Computer Entertainment
Released: January 26, 2010
MSRP: $59.99

In the year 2025, the maintenance of a full-scale armed force has become such a burden that countries around the world have cut their military down to the bare minimum, just enough to defend national security. Not only that, but no nation's military is allowed to leave its own country's borders, effectively forcing world peace. Of course, this is a videogame, and violence always finds a way.

To get around the pesky inconvenience of global peace, the world gave rise to a variety of private military corporations who would work for anybody, allowing countries to continue their wars without violating any rules. The PMCs competed heavily for contracts, always trying to undercut each other, but the competition soon became vicious. PMCs actively began to attack each other, kickstarting the "Shadow War" as they tried to run each other out of business by straining supplies and raising budgets. MAG revolves around three powerful PMC factions -- Raven, SVER and Valor -- all of which now battle for supremecy of the global war market.

Players will choose to serve one of these three factions, and will be able to switch sides if they so decide. Each PMC has access to its own unique weapons and skills. Raven is a high-tech force from Western Europe that uses the most advanced equipment, but lacks real-world fighting experience. SVER is a patchwork collection of soldiers from the Middle East and Russia who make the best of what they have, while Valor is an elite band of mercenaries who employ standard military gear and excel at communication.

The factions are all fairly balanced and the differences are mostly aesthetic. During each battle, players will earn XP for kills and assists, completing objectives and healing allies or performing repairs. These points can then be spent on a skill tree to unlock new items and weapons. A very simplistic skill tree is in effect, allowing the player some measure of customization. For instance, you can focus on close-quarter combat, or pick skills to aid in sniping, or work on acquiring heavy armor to take on vehicles or perform defensive roles. Nothing particularly innovative or amazing, but it does the job and has enough content to satisfy fans of customization.

Players can save several different character types, allowing them to switch during respawns depending on their needs. It's always handy to have a few various character types to tackle any given situation, although you usually won't go far wrong if you stick with a machine gun and a medical kit. Characters are restricted by point limits, helping to balance them out and making sure that the heavily armored soldier doesn't tout two rocket launchers, a shotgun, a medical kit and several types of grenades.

The game is split into various game types. Suppression is a simple deathmatch-style game. In this mode, PMCs fight amongst themselves instead of each other, as it's been designed as a training match for newcomers. Sabotage charges factions with the task of capturing or defending two control points. When the attackers control two points, a third objective opens up, which the attackers must destroy. Acquisition is my favorite mode so far, as players must capture enemy vehicles and take them to transport choppers.

The main mode, however, is Domination. These matches are crucial to the game's "Shadow War," and each match will contribute to the success of each PMC on a persistant world map. 256 players are split into various platoons and squads, and each one will have its own attack or defense objective. The performance in each sector of the map adds up to total victory.

As a shooter, MAG is very good at what it does. The HUD can sometimes be confusing and objectives aren't made very clear during the heat of battle, but it rarely matters because MAG is just fun to run around in, shooting at enemies and hoping for the best. The core gameplay is conventional in many ways, but better for it. Fans of Killzone 2 will feel at home with the controls, and clear influences from established shooters like Call of Duty only help to keep the game smooth and dependable.

Be warned that the controls can take some getting used to, even for those used to PS3 shooters. Weapon scrolling is assigned to the R2 button while special items like grenades and health kits are scrolled with L2. Most players I have encountered so far haven't even learned that medical kits exist, let alone know how to use them. It doesn't help that scrolling is slow and it can be very difficult to revive a fallen player before getting shot down yourself. MAG struggles with communicating its ideas to the player. The ideas themselves are great, and the gameplay can be incredible fun, but MAG doesn't tell its players just how much fun it can be.

In truth, it takes a game or two to get used to how MAG does things. Once you do, however, it feels great. Combat is quick without being chaotic, and heavy without feeling grinding or slow. The respawns can be lengthy because they are designed to let players attack in waves, which means you can sometimes respawn in three seconds, or sometimes wait fifteen. As a solid and addictive shooter, however, MAG delivers, and can be considered a very good game on just those merits.

Of course, it's the size and scope of MAG that makes it more than just a shooter, and here is where Zipper Interactive has truly impressed. Despite the lack of player information and sometimes confusing objectives, the huge scale of the battles has been produced expertly and works out incredibly well. Zipper's decision to split the armies into squads in order to keep 256 players from congesting the map was very wise and keeps the game feeling huge but not overwhelming. Sometimes this can lead to large sections of map with nothing going on, and sometimes it can lead to choke points full of too much action, but generally the balance is impressive.

Much of the enjoyment of MAG relies on communication. Each faction is split into squads and platoons, with players designated as commanders. A full company of 128 players will be made up of four platoons, each of which are made up of four squads, each of which are made up of eight players. Squads, platoons and companies are led by designated players who will not only be responsible for giving orders, but who will also get special command abilities that can have significant effects on battle, such as increased respawn rates or various buffs for allied soldiers. Of course, players who don't communicate or want to help out allies in way can have a pretty significant effect on the battlefield, so be aware that sometimes you'll be on a losing streak and it won't be your fault.

As well as the typical running and gunning, there are also vehicles and turrets to control. Players can ride in tanks and APCs, and switch to available seats to either drive the vehicles themselves, or utilize gun emplacements. The vehicle controls work very well, and are surprisingly balanced as well. Tanks and turrets are significantly powerful, but can be destroyed fairly easily with dedicated enemy fire, meaning that nothing remains too overpowering.

The whole Shadow War aspect is very promising, and will need several weeks of community input in order to take shape. At this early stage, however, it's clear that the lasting effects of player battles will keep drawing players in, not to mention the customization and the simple joy of feeling like your in-game actions affect more than just the single match you're playing. It only takes a short amount of time to start feeling attached to your company, and invested in the game's changing world. MAG has all the tools to keep players hooked, and those tools are very well crafted indeed.

With such a huge game, there are some obvious graphical trade-offs. MAG does not look as beautiful as some smaller shooters out there, but this is made up for with a pretty striking art style that reminds me of Criterion's Black in many ways. The three PMCs have very distinguishable looks, with Raven especially making a good visual impact. Unfortunately, I noticed a few glitches involving dead bodies spasming uncontrollably, and one player fell through the floor. However, these glitches are few and seem mostly harmless.

Massive Action Game delivers on the promise of its name. It's certainly massive, and there is more than enough action to go around. MAG's biggest draw, however, is that it's perfect for both hardcore multiplayer FPS fans and newcomers alike. Those who want to get invested can go for objectives, delve into the Shadow War, and become commanders, while those who just want to run around and shoot the nearest enemy can do so. The battles are so big that everybody can be catered to, and players have the freedom to experience MAG in any manner they which, with any level of involvement.

Most importantly, however, is the fact that MAG's concept works. It works very well, in fact. What more could you want?

Score: 8.0 -- Great (8s are impressive efforts with a few noticeable problems holding them back. Won't astound everyone, but is worth your time and cash.)










More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

177 comments | showing # 1 to 50
prev
next 50 comments

Melvargh's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:01
Melvargh
I DO like just running around shooting dudes in the face when I play online shooters.
Perhaps I'll check it out.
etc's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:04
etc
Meh.
The beta put me off alot.
Ill need a new way to get my moneys worth out of this PS3..
buzski's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:04
buzski
I had the beta, and it was enjoyable, still undecided if I'm going to pick it up though. Great review! I agree with almost everything you said.
Xonticus's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:07
Xonticus
Its good to hear that the system is balanced. Day 1 for me.
zer0faults's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:09
zer0faults
Was this reviewed at the private event? Further was the private event hosted over standard services, or was there a server on site, or do the reviewers not know.

Showing off a game like this and having many of the 200+ people in one location doesn't seem like a fair way to assess it, that is why I am concerned. If it was the private party, how many people were there playing?
AnonEmoose's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:09
AnonEmoose
Hmmm

I might just use the EB promo for this.
king kong five's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:10
king kong five
Dude, I haven't even played Demon's Souls. I'm so fucking behind on the list of games I want to get my hands on. Just toss this on the list and maybe I'll be playing it in 2013.
whateverthismeanstoyou's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:10
whateverthismeanstoyou
This game just sounds like a real time vampire. I will pass and wait for more single player experiences. I guess multiplayer only game at least means it's either free or cheaper than the full price game.
SallyNasty's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:11
SallyNasty
I was somewhat interested in this game until I saw the add with the dipshit in the facemask with his hat cocked to the side. If that is the demographic they are after - then I want nothing to do with this game.
Balaamsafe's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:13
Balaamsafe
Glad the core of the game is fun to play, just need to see if the population of the PSN take to it or not.
obie191970's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:14
obie191970
I might give it a shot after Sheppard saves the galaxy from the Collectors. I want the servers to be nice and broken in before I play.
DUFFMcWALIN's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:15
DUFFMcWALIN
awesome looks like im picking it up. I urge anyone else on the fence to pick it up too and to have a mic so we can kick some ass : )
Jim Sterling's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:16
Jim Sterling
Zer0faults:

The 256-player match was played between a team of people in the UK, all in one area, and another team elsewhere. 128 people were grouped together for the Domination matches. As far as I am aware, the other 128 were in another country. It was all done online, so I can be pretty sure it was an accurate representation of the full game.
CelicaCrazed's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:19
CelicaCrazed
I knew Zipper was going to pull through with this game. Just bought Borderlands though so it may be a week or two before I enlist in the Shadow War.
ChaosTeaCup's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:19
ChaosTeaCup
Sounds great - I really like the idea, man. But the name. Shit, the name Sucks.
de BLOO's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:22
de BLOO
IT'S NEVER ENOUGH JIM.
randombullseye's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:29
randombullseye
You might say it's a huge game!
RenegadePanda's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:29
RenegadePanda
Oh, Jim. Your taste in games worries me.
Dudemullet's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:32
Dudemullet
SVER just sounds moar awesome
zer0faults's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:33
zer0faults
@Jim, Thats a pretty inaccurate representation. If they are handling only two locations you can prioritize traffic easily. Not only that but depending on how the traffic is handled, people in the same area can possibly handle data between themselves.

This is why these situations are not good examples. You can set a dedicated path also on routers to speed up traffic between two locations, removing much of the flood of data from 250 different locations and allow it to stream out, follow the same path, and arrive all together.

For people who played this during the beta did you have any issues with the following:

Hits you were almost 100% sure were on target missing
Players teleporting, or jerky movement
Message flooding for hits/kills
Dying after a fight
Simultaneous deaths

These are all good indications of lag. Hopefully this turns out great, but these private playing sessions are easily manipulated and for a game who sole focus is online, lag would be the main complaint.

Also like to know how many people were using headsets as that is more server load.
NEXSUS's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:33
NEXSUS
Don't you feel your review is a little rushed? Sony just today said there are no reviews yet because there are not many people to play with

I feel your barely touched the leveling and commanding subject which gives you responsibilities and abilities, it seems like a very important thing in the game but you wrote only couple of lines about it

Maybe it because you didn't get to those levels yet, so maybe you should have wait with your review until you did
Holyetheline's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:34
Holyetheline
Awesome review, this will probably be one of the first PS3 games I buy if I ever get a PS3.
CDC Red Ninja's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:34
CDC Red Ninja
very good review!
brainpower4's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:35
brainpower4
This is really the sort of game that is totally dependent on the community. If PS3 players embrace it, and actually start learning how to play it, unclear objectives and "hidden" game elements shouldn't be an issue.

On the other hand, if the community doesn't jump in, there is no way standard games will reach 256 people.

I'm curious what the competitive community will do with this. There won't ever be clans large enough to consistently fill maps on their own. Even 8 man squads are pretty hard to get together on a regular basis.
Drakengard's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:38
Drakengard
Sounds great. MW2 certainly grabbed me for awhile, but quickly grew terribly old since there was no real sense of purpose. You got good, you unlocked some stuff, you killed teams and eventually just wondered what the hell you were doing...

MAG at least provides some sort of purpose, a team, and large enough conflicts to where I'll feel like its...well...something bigger than myself running around a small map getting big killstreaks and being a one man army. And that's pretty much how every match boiled down to in deathmatches and the other game types were ruined by the nukes among other things...

Also, I'll finally be able to experience a true Zipper developed title which is tantalizing in itself.
loki d20's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:40
loki d20
I've pre-ordered MAG, but don't know when I'll get to playing it.

Got a bit more of Darsiders left. ME2 releases tomorrow and I'll be on that for at least 2-3 weeks. Need to finish AC2. Need to really get into Demons' Souls. Still haven't cracked open Dead Space, GoW Collection. And then there's February and March right around the freaking corner with more good games.

Too many good games out there, not enough time.

P.S. Good review again Jim. Thanks for the info and confidence that my purchase isn't for naught.
zer0faults's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:40
zer0faults
I think the PS3 community will take to the game as long as it runs smooth. Hopefully it will inspire more people to get headsets and make use of them, and make use of squad tactics.
Lil Jorsche's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:41
Lil Jorsche
Good review, sounds like a fun game.
karooo's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:43
karooo
are you allowed to review it before the release date i mean, you should have played the game more, u may get into some trouble with sony not sure lol :P

but superb review 8 is a great score for this game. :)
Elsa's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:45
Elsa
Excellent review!!
Until people "get it" the game will likely start off as a bit chaotic, but once people start to understand that this is a team game and that points are doubled near the FRAGO I think that this game will be awesome!

What impressed me was also the lack of lag. Every once in awhile there might be a bit of lag, but no moreso than any other game out there. For the most part the game ran exceptionally smoothly given the number of players on the map.

Day 1 purchase for me. I'll be running with Raven and ranking up to Squad Leader (my favorite position... even moreso than Platoon leader or OIC). I found this game to be very addictive during the betas!!
fozzyozzy's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:45
fozzyozzy
It's odd, but I think for an online-dedicated game like this focused around community and player interaction that a weeks later follow up re-review might be in order.

That being said, thanks for the review. Nice to know there's a bigger emphasis on cooperation than every other shooter out there.
flabzilla's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:48
flabzilla
This sort of fell off my radar but it's good to see that it turned out decent.

Will have to check it out at some point.
Volomon's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:49
Volomon
Evil Dtoid, I was thinking about not getting it, but now.
absolutzero's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:51
absolutzero
I enjoyed the Beta though I, too, am undecided on this purchase. In any event I had to comment about the comparison drawn between MAG's controls and the play controls of a game that I thought was so god-awful that it felt like trying to solve a 10-pound rubik's cube with your hands and arms submerged in quick-drying cement.

I liken MAG's controls a lot more to games like Resistance 2 because it's mostly pretty forgiving and feels a lot better.
Black Nexus's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:54
Black Nexus
Sounds good, I should have it by friday.
The Pat Man's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:55
The Pat Man
@ zero0faults

The game ran pretty damn smooth, even in the open beta with thousands of people giving it a try. Lag was very minimal. I was playing with many people from all over the states and the world without really experiencing any lag. Whatever lag reared its way were only very minor of the minorist degree of hiccups (just being teleported 10 backwards and that's it).

I can understand your concern though since there are so many playing it at once. But the game has had multiple betas (six I do believe) to iron out these issues early on. The open beta ran just fine so I'm pretty certain the final product runs just the same, if not better.
jawshoeuh's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:56
jawshoeuh
neat. but I'll pass.
MidnightOwl's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:58
MidnightOwl
@zer0faults

I experienced lag in the beta one time...input was slow for a second or two and then sped up for another second or two. 4 seconds out of 20 hours playtime is, I'd say, a good ratio.

Nothing else from your list. The game is very smooth.
Nikotine's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 11:59
Nikotine
You can't review an online focused game until the public servers go up. Look at socom, the game was fine but the servers were fucked for the first few weeks. Should at least wait a day to see if the servers and matchmaking is functional first
Guncannon's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 12:03
Guncannon
I'm surprised that there aren't any comments yet about how 8.0 is somehow too low a score for the game. Very refreshing.
AidyD's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 12:05
AidyD
I played closed beta and open beta (both with reduced graphics) and honestly lag is not an issue whatsoever for me.

Gears of War with its host lag, fifa with its occasional trippy lag spikes and RFG being a lagfest for me - I was expecting MAG to lag like hell.

But it ran like a dream. Seriously no lag. Im buying asap, awesome game, requires real teamwork and tactics to properly succeed in battle.
sheppy's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 12:06
sheppy
Only an 8? How much did Microsoft pay you for this review?

Just kidding. It's good to see some of the early reviews praising the game. I feared the very "PC like" aspect of this game would get it bashed beyond repair. Now all I gotta do is wait until fridays payday to snag my copy.
pl0x kthanxbai's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 12:07
pl0x kthanxbai
i this game is more or less like battlefield 2


minus choppers and planes, which is both good and bad, a good chopper pilot is a huge pain in the ass and planes are basically invincible unless your using a plane too


MAG is also the evolution of the chain of command present in BF2



however its really obvious that the game lacked polish and im completely sure that if they could zipper wouldve delayed the game a few months
Strafekillin's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 12:07
Strafekillin
Qutoed from jeff ruebenstein of the playstation blog. "Reviews can’t be written until the game is actually out. I mean, you can’t pass pre-release judgment on a game whose major, industry-leading feature (256 players in a single battle) can’t be tested until release day." This review reeks of BS just like most of jims reviews. How can you review a game of this scale, given the fact that it is online only. Not to mention, more than likely the servers arent up.
Elsa's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 12:08
Elsa
@Zerofaults... I played in all 5 beta phases and the servers were filled with people from all over the world. I'm Canadian and often got a bunch of germans in my squad. Additionally I played with someone I knew from Florida... and I'm in BC Canada - so pretty much opposite sides of the country.

There were only a few times lag was noticeable and it was usually just before the servers would go down so that they could patch an issue (as was common during the beta process). In fact I've noticed more lag playing COD:MW2 than I ever did during the MAG beta.

To answer your questions:
Hits you were almost 100% sure were on target missing - hit detection was excellent and this was often remarked upon during the beta.

Players teleporting, or jerky movement - occasionally on death there was some odd movement ... the only time the teleporting/jerky movement or lag was noticeable was right before the servers went down to repatch... part of the beta process. Other than this, lag was rarely noticed.

Message flooding for hits/kills - no, never noticed this (excepting on previous servers going down thing)

Dying after a fight - no because usually you have a bleedout option... so you lie waiting for a teammate to revive you there unless the enemy comes up and finishes you off. The only instant kill was usually a sniper headshot or a grenade and both show as the method that killed you.

Simultaneous deaths - LOL... yeah, when you get hit by a mortar or air strike there were lots of simultaneous deaths! :)
David Putz's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 12:10
David Putz
Buy a game based upon the internet connections of the masses in Australia? Never. Not going after this one.
zer0faults's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 12:14
zer0faults
@Elsa, thanks for the news, its great to hear they have the server side down and I may have to check this out day one.
zer0faults's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 12:15
zer0faults
@Strafekillin - There was a private event for review staff to check out the game, presumably with full servers. As Jim noted in his reply to me.
Jim Sterling's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 12:18
Jim Sterling
Strafekillin:

Shut up until you know wtf you are talking about.

I've played the game, online, against 256 players. So there.
Elsa's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/25/2010 12:23
Elsa
@strafekillin... Jeff shouldn't mouth off when he doesn't know facts. The game was in beta for almost 5 months. I'm sure that many reviewers were in the full term of the beta and then also may have played at a reviewer's "event". This game only shows over the longer term when people have ranked up and are able to play in the 256 player matches with actual Squad Leaders, Platoon Leaders and OIC positions filled. Reviews based on the beta are likely MUCH more accurate than somebody's review based on one week after the game releases.
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!