It was ten years ago that Halo: Combat Evolved was released on the original Xbox. The series would go on to create a standard for the first-person shooter genre and arguably help secure the Xbox as a household name. First-person shooters have evolved considerably since the original release of Halo, but even so, I still consider Combat Evolved to be one of my top games of all times due to what it did for me as a gamer.
For me, Halo opened my eyes to what a truly immersive experience could be. Never before in a videogame had I experienced such a rich, huge world with intriguing characters and an incredibly engaging story. And of course, there was the multiplayer LAN component, which for someone like me in 2001 who could never afford a PC rig, allowed me to get a taste of what intense 16-player combat could really be like.
With the tenth anniversary on hand, Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary is 343 Industries' way of both giving something back to fans of the original and introducing new players to the start of Master Chief's journey.
Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary (Xbox 360) Developers: 343 Industries, Saber Interactive Inc., Certain Affinity Inc. Publisher: Microsoft Studios Released: November 15, 2011 (Worldwide) / November 17, 2011 (Japan) MSRP: $39.99
At its core, Anniversary is the exact same Halo: CE experience you remember. 343 didn't change anything in terms of gameplay, mechanics, or AI. The only major change is in terms of visuals, which makes Halo look like it belongs in the current high-def generation of games. The visual fidelity of Master Chief's character model has been increased by 300 percent, while campaign environments have increased by between 3,000 to 8,000 percent.
The visuals are really mesmerizing, especially when compared to the original game's, which is something you can do yourself at any time during gameplay by pressing the Back button on your controller. The transition between those graphics and the revamped look takes about four seconds to complete, during which time the action continues but the screen is completely black (the delay happens regardless of the game being installed on your hard drive). You can even see cinematics with the old visuals -- you just have to be in classic mode before the cutscene begins.
While I get that 343 was trying to keep the same feel, it is a shame that they didn't try to fix a few minor annoyances. Specifically, the freeze you still get whenever parts of the level are loading. It only halts gameplay for about a couple of seconds in single-player, though it feels a little longer when you're doing online co-op.
The story still holds up and it was pretty rad getting to re-experience everything with the updated visuals, despite some bad facial animation syncing with the voice work. There are parts that dip, specifically points where you're just walking with no combat or music going on for a good while. It's funny, I never noticed that before but it's noticeable now with how current-day games handle the structure and flow of levels.
Other changes you can expect come in terms of the remastered sound effects. It's silly, but things like the Covenant laser weapons have more of a pew-pew-pew effect, giving an increased feeling of realism. The musical score has been remastered by Skywalker Sound as well, with additions to a number of songs, some more noticeable than others. You do have the option of listening to the original score by Marty O'Donnell by selecting it from the menu screen. Either way, the score is as wonderful as ever.
For hardcore Halo fanatics, every level now contains a hidden skull (game modifier) and more importantly, Terminals. This time, Terminals are fully animated sequences aimed to give some back story from the perspective of 343 Guilty Spark. While they're all enjoyable to watch, I feel you really need to know some of the backstory in the Halo universe presented in the novels, otherwise a lot of keywords will go over your head in regards to Forerunner lore. There is one particularly memorable, heart-wrenching Terminal that animates a scene from the Halo: Fall of Reach novel involving Captain Keyes.
Additionally, there's Kinect support, which -- out of everything in the package -- is the least-desirable component. The Kinect controls are tied to voice commands, so you can say things like "grenade" to throw a grenade or "flashlight" to turn on your flashlight. Saying the keyword takes about two seconds for the action to register in-game, so it's not much help when you're surrounded by Elites compared to simply pressing the grenade button.
I did at least like that I could say things to turn on subtitles, 3D, or switch between classic and remastered visuals. I'll take voice controls over navigating a menu function any day. Plus, there's the Analyze feature, which gets you intel on weapons, vehicles and characters by scanning the object. There's only 45 things to scan, and since this isn't tied to any Achievements, it's more of a distraction for OCD folks. Plus, the information you glean from what you scan is all stuff you can easily find on a Halo Wiki.
Finally, there's the stereoscopic 3D functionality -- it's fantastic. I checked out the 3D on my 47" Toshiba LED 3D TV and it looked great. Even the HUD elements, which are usually my number-one complaint with 3D games, were fine as they didn't really get in the way. I think what makes the 3D work well here is that it's very minimal how much stuff is in your face. It's a subtle effect that didn't hurt my head.
All of this makes up the single-player content. The other half of Halo: Anniversary consists of the multiplayer based on the Halo: Reach engine. First, there's Firefight with a map called Installation 04. The main thing with this is that the map feels like it's taken from the campaign's "Halo" level. Additionally, there are AI-controlled soldiers for the first time to assist you and three other players facing wave after wave of enemy forces. Granted, the AI units aren't the sharpest and serve to distract more than actually help.
As for competitive multiplayer, there are six remade maps in this collection that consist of maps from Halo: CE, Halo: CE PC, and Halo 2. Those maps are Battle Canyon (Beaver Creak), High Noon (Hang 'Em High), Penance (Damnation), Solitary (Prisoner), Ridgeline (Timberland) and Breakneck (Headlong). All the maps felt great, and it was awesome to revisit them re-imagined in Reach. My favorite was the Hang 'Em High remake; it's substantially better than the remake we saw in Halo 2.
All the maps have some additions to them -- Beaver Creak, for instance, sees the teleporters located in new positions. There are two different variations to every map: one more akin to the original version, and then the slightly updated version.
Halo: Anniversary matchmaking will also see new matchmaking playlists that replicate the original Halo feel for Squad, BTB, FFA, Classic, and Firefight. This means that there will be no Armor Abilities, one Frag Grenade at loadout, melee strength is reduced, and player speed, gravity, jump height, shield, and health recharge rates are all increased.
The icing on the cake here is that players will also be given a pistol with traits that mimic the Halo: CE pistol in their loadout. So that means you can hold down the trigger to unload your clip and the power is greatly increased (three headshots and you're dead!)
All this multiplayer content will actually be sold separately in the "Anniversary Map Pack" for 1200 Microsoft Points, scheduled to come out the same day Anniversary is released. Additionally, Anniversary will include a code for this map pack, so you have the option of downloading the content to store on your hard drive (making it easier to launch these maps through Halo: Reach) or just launching them through your Anniversary disc.
At the end of the day, I think Halo: Anniversary is primarily designed for hardcore Halo fans. If you don't already own Halo: Combat Evolved or are still addicted to Halo: Reach, then I highly recommend getting Anniversary. The original Halo is available on Games on Demand for 1200 MS Points, and with the aforementioned map pack alone being sold for the same price, you're getting a lot of bang for your buck.
Final Verdict: 9.0
Superb: 9s are a hallmark of excellence. There may be flaws, but they are negligible and won't cause massive damage to what is a supreme title in its *genre*.
Hamza Aziz, Destructoid's Community Director, has been here since day one. He was born when a tiger coughed up a hairball into a pool of ooze. He was one of the original Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles before budget cuts. Hamza works as a previews editor and manages a team in San Francisco. To date he has given away tens of thousands of dollars in prizes to readers. What a dick. Actually, Hamza is as kind as he is hairy.
Likes
Super Mario RPG, Halo, iPhone, Videogame cover bands, Super Nintendo
Meet the rest of the team
I only finally got around to playing through the entirety of the first game at the beginning of this year, so I'm not in a rush to go through it again, but I'm sure I'll pick this up eventually.
Jim, does the gameplay hold up? I mean, I assume by your score that you enjoyed playing the game again, but were there times when you felt 'oh man, this level design feels dated' or 'this mechanic is a pain, I can't believe we used to live like this'?
Really enjoyed Halo: CE back in the day, would love to play it again with the HD hotness, but worried about spoiling fond memories, as often happens when one tries to re-live the old hits.
Never played the original Halo as I never had an original Xbox. As a result, have always felt pretty apathetic about the series as a whole, observing it from the distance as nothing more than source material for Red vs. Blue, which I stopped watching when season 3 started because season 3 sucked. I might give it a shot with this.
I am conflicted on how I feel about this game. I havn't played Halos since 3 and not sure if I want to go back and if I do would it be for a game I've beaten a dozen times and sunk hours of MP into or would I want to grab Reach and finish what I started.
Will probably pick this up. Also, I didn't read anything in regards to LAN support. Is it still there available for 16 people? Still 4 people per screen or did they make it like reach and odst and only have 2?
The reviews this game got when it was first released were hilarious.
What did it do, that other games hadn't done better before it? Is it just because it was a console game?
I figured after TEN YEARS people would finally start to just come out and say "Yeah, the first Halo campaign, it really wasn't that good. Neither was Halo 2's, but at least it had multiplayer."
i'm definitely will be picking it up before christmas.
i really hope that publishers will take notes here - that's how you do a remake, not making straight ports and selling them for more than retail versions of those games.
"9s are a hallmark of excellence"
"a supreme title in its *genre*"
That's what it says right there next to the score. Not going to rage or anything but I don't really understand how a remake of a game should get such boasting accolades like that. And I loved Halo when it was first released.
@Forsakeneyes: Because its still Halo, dude. Halo exhibits a single-minded focus that the modern FPS, with its choreographed set-pieces and thrilling scripted sequences, largely disregards. This is a game about the arc of a perfectly thrown grenade, a game about tense games of cat-and-mouse with foes as powerful as you, a game about constant improvisation with the tools at your disposal. It’s a game that always feels tactical, and a game that – even now – has the capacity to surprise.
The game is a bonafide classic, is why I'm telling you, a FPS streamlined, built up, and shipped out with combat that works in a way rarely achieved in the genre.
"Never before in a videogame had I experienced such a rich, huge world with intriguing characters and an incredibly engaging story." "someone like me in 2001 who could never afford a PC rig"
my brain hurts a lot, when i read stuff like this.
Anyway, what is more important is - does the second half of the game look and feel like the same constant copy/paste as it was in the original, or updated visuals hide it?
not even a mention of the library? rose tinted glasses indeed. However, despite my hate towards what Halo may represent, i enjoyed CE on the pc. I kinda like the characters for some odd reason, and the setting. The open levels were the best thing about the campaign, the corridor sections were some of the worst. The AI, however, some of the best to play against, it often offered different experiences in playthroughs and restarts. Really wish the game had bots sometimes.
Nice to see 343 are starting their Halo tenure with a good one. Ill be picking it up along side my copy of Saints Row the Third tomorrow morning and will probably boot it up sometime this weekend.
Been playing this since Saturday, it's a perfect HD recreation of the original game. It's worth noting that the multiplayer isn't based on Halo: Reach, it is Halo Reach; A chunk of the Reach experience. For that reason the multiplayer part is pretty pointless if you already own Reach, the included DLC code gives you the full Reach experience on your Reach disc and people who don't like Reach won't be interested in it anyway.
I'll buy this when it gets re-released again for the next xbox. MS is clearly going the Call of Duty route with Halo wherein they'll be releasing one game a year from here on out.
Halo CE is easily one of my top 10 games of all time. I played it after Half Life, Doom, and Quake, so I can say for certain that I didn't love it simply because it was my first fps experience. What made Halo so special was that it had a layer of polish that was lacking from other shooters of the time. Everything about it looked great, ran smoothly, and played perfectly.
I was really hoping that with the remake they'd add new content to the single player campaign (weapons, areas, vehicles, etc), but sadly this isn't the case. I'll probably wait until it drops in price before buying it.
Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?
Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!
Contest:
8:00 AM on 11.14.2011 | 
Also, 9.0 for mobile users.
Huh.
As revolutionary a shooter as we've ever had.
I'd rather play this than BF3.
"more of a pew-pew-pew effect, giving an increased feeling of realism"
And LOL'd pretty hard.
Hope you enjoy this Halo fans!
Really enjoyed Halo: CE back in the day, would love to play it again with the HD hotness, but worried about spoiling fond memories, as often happens when one tries to re-live the old hits.
@Tyson: Highfive.
Will probably pick this up. Also, I didn't read anything in regards to LAN support. Is it still there available for 16 people? Still 4 people per screen or did they make it like reach and odst and only have 2?
What did it do, that other games hadn't done better before it? Is it just because it was a console game?
I figured after TEN YEARS people would finally start to just come out and say "Yeah, the first Halo campaign, it really wasn't that good. Neither was Halo 2's, but at least it had multiplayer."
i really hope that publishers will take notes here - that's how you do a remake, not making straight ports and selling them for more than retail versions of those games.
They didn't add the Flamethrower or missile warthog from Halo PC I presume?
$40 price tag makes this an easy purchase. Thanks for the review, Hamza.
"a supreme title in its *genre*"
That's what it says right there next to the score. Not going to rage or anything but I don't really understand how a remake of a game should get such boasting accolades like that. And I loved Halo when it was first released.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.76.5663&rep=rep1&type=pdf
The game is a bonafide classic, is why I'm telling you, a FPS streamlined, built up, and shipped out with combat that works in a way rarely achieved in the genre.
Twelve pages to explain one term?! When did words get so complicated?
my brain hurts a lot, when i read stuff like this.
Anyway, what is more important is - does the second half of the game look and feel like the same constant copy/paste as it was in the original, or updated visuals hide it?
Why would they remake a map for Reach that's already in Reach?
I was really hoping that with the remake they'd add new content to the single player campaign (weapons, areas, vehicles, etc), but sadly this isn't the case. I'll probably wait until it drops in price before buying it.