Not in this review, just in general. This review is actually sobering in its lack of enthusiasm for the minor resolution bump.
Anyways I never played God of War, not my style of game really, though I might play it eventually. On a PS2 emulator in "1200p" and 16xMSAA :P
As a PS3 owner, I really don't see a reason to skip over this collection, unless you really, really hate good games.
You have to sometimes set the cage that the guy is in in little grooves that come up out of the ground that keep the cage from sliding back down.
@Nick:
why'd it take so long to review this?
Got our copy about a week late due to a shipping error, then the holidays, then tons of other stuff I personally had to handle work wise around here. No real reason other than time constraints.
I see what you're saying and can only argue that it is likely because we have these 289749873423" televisions these days and the bump from 480 to 720 is absolutely huge. I would of argued the opposite a couple of generations ago but crisp graphics are a must now days (sadly) to get a high score from reviewers.
As the shepherds (critics/reviewers) go so goes the sheep (consumers) which is why it's such a marketable point.
I see no elitism in my post. Sensitive much?
The point is reviews write-off massively higher resolutions in PC versions as unimportant yet praise "HD" as if it is anything other than a marketing term.
I don't like silly misconceptions on ANY platform.
There is no such thing as 1200p. Stop falling for marketing ploys for 16:10 monitors.
Great review, although I don't think a better resolution/trophies are worth my money when I already own the games.
That's very true considering that ANY PC resolution over 648x480 is technically HD, and any resolution including and greater than 1620 x 1280 is beyond HD.
However, I don't see where anyone has dismissed that anything HD-resolution or beyond on PCs is irrelevant or unimportant. Textures and framerate might be bad, but those aren't necessarily inclusive with respect to resolution. So, I'm not quite sure that I follow you.
And this coming from someone whose PC will blow away anything the PS3 or XB360 can do.
I better rephrase that. There is no true HD format of 1200p, its just a bigger 1080p signal.
There is no industry definition of anything beyond 1080p at this point. That's true. However, to say that it's a bigger 1080p signal is a misnomer. It's not like 1080 is upconverted to 1200. The video card is sending out a native 1600 x 1200 signal.
As long as the textures and frame rate from the game can account for that, the visuals are by definition beyond anything that any console can do. But if the visuals are designed with a lower resolution in mind, the extra resolution is somewhat moot since "upconverting" does not technically add additional resolution.
even 1 console people should get this sweetsauce
or get em to buy a ps3 already and enjoy both worlds
@ SASUGA RIVAL: Agreed, but they should take it a step further and put Ico and Shadow of the Colossus together like with the two GoW games.Would be a perfect time to do it too especially since they have The Last Guardian coming sometime soon.
Then again, the gameplay looks 5x better, so who cares? Not me.
You have no idea what you are talking about. Stop.
@ John B
I was just trying to make an observation really, nothing too sinister or serious. I have often heard that the massively high resolutions on PC are of no importance and console games look "about the same," so I find it funny when a minor bump in resolution is considered a big deal for a console game. It's nothing too dire, I just find it amusing.
I find the term "HD" amusing to behin with. I was playing Doom in "HD" when the SNES was out for heaven't sake.
...no. Seriously. GoW is a first-party property, made by a Sony studio (Sony Santa Monica). A 360 port will never happen.
Maybe (and it's a big maybe)... I'll think about not passing it up if I see them in the bargain bin, once everyone comes to their senses, and the price drops like a rock.
And YES, I love the games.
"I can't justify buying two games I already own, even if they are somewhat prettier. Seems like a "sucker" move to me, and I'd hate to reward such behavior. We'd only get a shit ton more of the same with other PS2 titles."
There are new features and the game is now in HD at a budget price. I can only hope they do the same with other PS2 titles, mainly MGS and the Team Ico games.
Games are fantastic, and are the reason I still own a PS2. When I finally make the jump over to the PS3 this will most certainly be in the shopping cart along with the console. They seriously are some of the finest games ever constructed.
A Wiki read-through on resolutions might do the job, but suffice it to say everything is a two-part resolution, vertical pixel count by horizontal. Old TV res was 640x480 and in progressive scan called "480p." Current "HD" consoles display in 1280x720, though often not natively and are just scaled to that res. 1280x720 is not really a high res and it being called "high definition" is just a silly marketing term, PC games reach resolutions far, far beyond that more than a decade ago... forever ago.
Anyway, what you know as "1080p" is 1920x1080, just another resolution and not a fixed standard. PCs can display tons of different resolutions, they are not limited to the three console resolutions. I play my games in 1920x1200, which you might understand as "1200p"... there is no scaling, it is a native res. Some PC monitors go all the way up to something like 2500x1600. and then there is the somewhat recent multi-monitor movement which means playing games in something like 5040x1200. These resolutions are like 50 times the pixels of "720p".
So again, my only point was that PC games have been played at these very high resolutions forever now and 720p is quite low compared, even 1080 being average. So when we PC gamers hear about the AWESOME HD GRAFFIX of 720p, and indeed see a game "remastered in HD!!!" at 720p, it kind of makes us chuckle. The "AND 2xMSAA!!!" thing is also funny, but that's a whole other post I guess.
@ Shadowii
Your comment reminds me of the jocks in high school who make fun of science nerds for knowing more than them. I never said these games suck and I never said playing on a console is bad, all I said was 720p with 2xMSAA isn't something to brag about or get excited about and yet everyone does, while at the same time they tell me PC games look no better than console versions and that higher res does not matter. WHICH IS IT?
Same thing happens with something like Call of Duty Classic, they market it as NOW IN HD when I was playing the damn thing at a much higher resolution when it came out 6 years ago.
I am fighting ignorance over what resolution and HD mean and the silly marketing term "HD" is, not consoles. Stop calling me a fanboy for no reason and read the posts.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow



















follow


