Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Review: Dragon Age: Origins photo

What do you do when you stop making games for one of the biggest roleplaying franchises of all time? If you're BioWare, the answer is easy -- make your own roleplaying franchise and start again from scratch. Dragon Age: Origins sees BioWare return to the world of dark fantasy since it disassociated from the critically acclaimed Baldur's Gate games, bringing an entirely new world, characters and story to the genre in the hopes of creating a brand new fantasy RPG series.

BioWare has clearly spent a long time crafting Ferelden, the realm in which Dragon Age takes place, and the many inhabitants found within. Much work has also gone into the combat and tactical system, and there is no doubt that this is a BioWare production through and through. Is this an entirely good thing, or does Dragon Age fall just short of greatness by sticking just a bit too close to the BioWare traditions?

Read on for the full review of Dragon Age: Origins.

Dragon Age: Origins (PC, PS3, Xbox 360 [reviewed])
Developer: BioWare
Publisher: Electronic Arts
Released: November 3, 2009
MSRP: $59.99

Ferelden's history books state that, many centuries ago, a group of mages tried to usurp Heaven and The Maker, but in doing so, unleashed an evil terror upon the world that turned them into the hated Dark Spawn -- a race of zombie-like creatures that hide underground and emerge every few centuries to instigate a "Blight" and attempt to take over the world. Standing in the way of the Dark Spawn are the Grey Wardens, an order of warriors who have remained throughout history to push the Dark Spawn horde back into hiding.

Players take on the role of the latest Grey Warden recruit, enlisted by the mysterious Duncan to face a re-merging Dark Spawn threat and its leader, The Arch Demon. Dragon Age: Origins starts with one of six completely unique stories depending on the race and background the player has chosen. One can choose to be a human noble, a mage, a Dalish elf, a city elf, a dwarven noble or a dwarven commoner. The "origin" stories themselves take at least an hour apiece to complete, and take the form of self-contained stories that manage to entertain in their own right. However, these sections are a mere taste of what comes next, as the game opens up into a massive RPG that will take at least forty hours to finish.

It has to be said that the world crafted by BioWare is absolutely wonderful. The lore is intriguing, with unique takes on the relationships between elves, dwarves and humans. The game also manages quite a few successful attempts at humor. Most importantly, however, the amount of choice in the game is superb. There are moments that really make the player think about the consequences of their actions, and many of the dilemmas give you options that are not clearly defined as "good" or "evil." It's up to the player to determine the morality of their actions, which is a great step forward for RPG gameplay.

As an experience, Dragon Age has few rivals that can stand up in comparison. It's a wonderful feeling to be immersed in the world of Ferelden and engage the numerous allied characters, such as the sarcastic Alistair or the bird-hating, misanthropic golem Shale. The main plot of the game is also remarkably interesting, full of political intrigue and moral implication that help spice up an otherwise typical "save the world from evil" narrative.

The game's combat system will be familiar to players of the Knights of the Old Republic games. Characters automatically engage in attacks while players select various skills for the characters to pull off. The game's biggest draw is the "Tactics" system, which offers a ridiculously deep set of commands and allow allied characters to act according to player specifications when not being directly controlled. Unfortunately, however, while the sheer amount of choice on offer is amazing, this bold new system also happens to be the game's biggest downfall.

It pains me to say it, but the tactics system doesn't work even half as well as BioWare would like us to think it does. For the first fifteen hours or so, players don't have to worry about it, but once the game ramps up the difficulty, allied characters gladly march into death, helped along by the fact that the A.I is pure garbage. Suddenly, players find themselves bogged down in endless and pedantic micromanagement as they blindly experiment with different tactics in a vain bid to keep allies alive. The pre-set tactics provided for players that don't like micromanagement are worthless, and require constant tweaking.

Don't get me wrong, I like tinkering with stats and playing with a game's twiddly knobs, but the tinkering is excessive in Dragon Age to the point of getting in the way of the game. It's also frustrating to spend ages trying to second-guess the game's A.I and craft a tactic set that works, only to have the allied characters continue to run around and get themselves killed.

Even worse is the fact that no amount of tactics can craft a team capable of dealing with the myriad obstacles constantly thrown at players. Be it tank-like enemy warriors that love to gang up on one player and systematically take the team down, archers that hide away and stun players with flights of arrows, or mages that can stun, freeze, drain and explode the allied party, often at once, there is too much to deal with at any given time, and players can easily be overwhelmed by the sheer clusterfuck of battle. I'd say you need a party of eight to deal with some of the huge battles in the game. Four doesn't feel like enough when twenty armed soldiers jump you and they have two mages with fireball spells backing them up.

The difficulty in Dragon Age is erratic at best and completely unbalanced at worst. Some dungeons are a breeze to get through for the first hour, and then suddenly there will be a room full of enemies that seem ludicrously powered up and completely overrun the player's team. These difficulty spikes appear randomly and without warning.

The game clearly wants to be treated like some sort of RTS, encouraging players to move allies into prime positions depending on their class. However, battles are just too chaotic and messy for any real RTS elements to shine through. This isn't helped by the fact that the only way to accurately position allies is to manually take control of them, but as soon as you give control back to the A.I, it will just carry on doing what it does best -- getting bullied by the enemy and dying within seconds. In the same way that Mass Effect tried to be a methodical shooter but put players up against fast-paced melee attackers, Dragon Age desperately wants to be a strategy game, but has made the game look, feel and play like a mindless, crazy hack n' slash.

It's worth noting that PC gamers get a more tactical perspective of battle and have access to hotkeys. These additions will surely help and make the PC game the infinitely superior choice. In comparison, the console versions cannot handle the kind of battles BioWare have created. This game probably should not have been released on the PS3 or Xbox 360. Even with the extra tools, however, the PC version still seems to suffer from many of the same problems, from what I have played of that version.

A number of other issues get in the way as well. Dragon Age is stingy on the healing items, with each shop you encounter selling maybe four or five of them and never restocking. In a game like this, where constant healing is necessary, it doesn't make sense. Skills like Herbalism let players make their own items, but of course, this requires finding the right ingredients, which can be a mission in and of itself.

The game also seems shockingly light on loot. I spent much of my game in the same armor, thanks to the fact that equipment on sale was either worthless, or required insane amounts of leveling up to acquire the strength to use. Much of the joy in RPGs comes from upgrading equipment, but the chances to do that in this game are limited until you've leveled up enough, and since it can take hours to achieve one level in Dragon Age, that's a lot of time spent in the same rusty armor.

Navigation in the game is a real bitch. I found that I often didn't want to complete some of the sub-quests, simply because it would have taken too much effort to find them. There is no compass system like in Oblivion, and many of the quests require you to simply guess where they are. If you're lucky enough to be in the same area as a quest location, you'll see a marker that directs you, but if the location is in another building or another city, good luck finding it. The World Map does not tell you where quest locations are, and marking your chosen quest as active seems to do absolutely nothing to help. The fact that quite a few quests consist of "Go to several different locations around the world and try to find where we've hidden stuff," adds insult to injury.

Compounding this is the fact that loading times can be pretty excessive as well. Traveling from city to city is a chore, and while I appreciate the fact that random encounters can sometimes happen during map travel, what I don't appreciate is the fact that such encounters require additional loading.

It sounds like I absolutely hated my time with Dragon Age, but that wouldn't be fair to say. It gave me many hours of fun, and I tried my hardest to love it. At the very least, the first fifteen hours were some of the best RPG gameplay I've enjoyed in the past few years, and that's more than can be said for most games out there. Dragon Age simply lets itself down, however, with its conflicted gameplay, imbalanced, random difficulty and poor A.I. If characters could look after themselves a little more, perhaps everything else would have been fine, but after hours of micromanagement and hair-pulling frustration, I can't say that I was sad to see the game's credits roll.

It's a real shame, because Dragon Age: Origins provides an incredibly memorable experience full of wonderful touches and beautiful flourishes. The combat system's core is robust and, with a bit more tweaking and less of a focus on tactics, could have been a truly incredible accomplishment in the RPG genre.

The game looks pretty decent, although it isn't by far the best looking game of the year. A few glitches do pop up again to truly let us know this is a BioWare game, the most common being characters that move their mouths but don't say anything. The real tragedy here is that the voice acting is pretty damn great, with characters like Shale and Alistair standing out as wonderful characters. The vocal talents of Tim Curry are criminally underutilized, however.

Dragon Age: Origins is a game that once looked set to be the best RPG of the year. It has a great story, high production values, and one of the most immersive worlds ever created in a videogame. Tragically, Origins' considerable high points have been squandered on a frustrating, unbalanced combat system, and a customizable A.I that's just too broken to adequately customize. Is Dragon Age a good game? Yes, it most assuredly is, providing an experience that will stick in the mind for a very long time. However, it is fitting that one of Origins' main themes is how seemingly good choices can have bad consequences. That message is something the game's design reinforces throughout. 

You should definitely play this game if you love RPGs, and for BioWare nuts, this is an easy buy. However, its status as a classic is questionable, and I wouldn't expect this to replace anybody's favorite RPG anytime soon.

Score: 7.5 -- Good (7s are solid games that definitely have an audience. Might lack replay value, could be too short or there are some hard-to-ignore faults, but the experience is fun.)



Continue: More top stories stories





prev
next 50 comments

232 comments | showing # 1 to 50

dangerman's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:03
dangerman
While a 7.5 is a disappointment, you did review the 360 version over the PC one which has been receiving significantly better reviews from most sources. I will be picking it up for PC for sure.
Threaded's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:08
Threaded
So wait, Bioware made a mediocre RPG?

Should....should I be running for the Fallout shelter?
Threaded's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:09
Threaded
Oh wait, false alarm not the PC version.
Volomon's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:09
Volomon
Damn sounds like they should have stuck to a D&D licensed game, where everything already has stats and modifiers to help balance the game. That way they could have focused on other things such as the AI.
CWal37's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:14
CWal37
Too bad you don't play PC games.
Jon B's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:14
Jon B
I think reviewing the 360 version, although it means there's a lower score, was the best thing to do. They made a version that is worse than another, so they get the lowest scoring score of the three.

I'll have to pick this up later down the line for PC when it's a little cheaper, or a Steam sale.
Diogo Ribeiro's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:15
Diogo Ribeiro
"which is a great step forward for RPG gameplay"

Which would be true if this hadn't already been done in the genre for, oh, some 10 odd years.
Scroll's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:16
Scroll
My only issue with this review is the fact it's a single platform review.

The fact that the ai is a concern of yours and on the pc version you can customize it much more deeply, just makes me believe it's a flaw of the console versions.

Nice read though.
PySk's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:17
PySk
@Jim:
Did you also play the PS3-Version and if so, is it a solid port or is it f*cked up like other PS3-Versions of multplatform-games (Fallout 3...) ?
laika one's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:18
laika one
@threaded it's not the first... Sonic Chronicles anyone?
Jim Sterling's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:18
Jim Sterling
PySk: Unfortunately no. I've played several hours of the PC version, I've completed the 360 version, but I've not so much as seen a physical copy of the fabled PS3 version.
ChaosTeaCup's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:21
ChaosTeaCup
What's the punishment for dying? Does it give you the chance to keep chipping away until the battle is won, or do you have to start from scratch?

I desperately want this game, but I don't want to be punished too punitavely for getting spanked in battle.
PySk's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:22
PySk
@Jim: Okay, thanks. :)
Korolev's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:24
Korolev
Seems to be a fairly balanced review. I'll try it out myself, that much is for certain.
Sonvar's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:24
Sonvar
Lowest score I've seen so far and I've read other reviews for the console versions too. I also find this odd because some reviews I read were by people who didn't like RPGs and they scored this higher. Ultimately I'll make up my own mind on it as I bought it for 360 for various reasons.

I'd also like to note to others if he feels AI is bad in the 360 version I wouldn't expect much better in PC version. The only pieces missing in console are supposed to be there is no overhead view(tactical view), toned done difficulty in fights due to no tactical view, and no toolset. So if you expect better AI out of the PC I think you'll be surprised.
Smuckers's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:25
Smuckers
Out of curiosity does anybody know whether there is a difference between the ps3 and 360 versions? I'd like to get the ps3 version cause i have more space on my hard drive, but if it is technically inferior to the 360 version i will get that version instead. And yeah i know i should get the pc version, but considering that my pc can only handle starcraft that's out of the question.
Jim Sterling's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:26
Jim Sterling
"What's the punishment for dying? Does it give you the chance to keep chipping away until the battle is won, or do you have to start from scratch?"

If you die, you die. After losing twenty minutes of progress, I quickly learned to save after every single fight I ever got into.
Sonvar's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:28
Sonvar
@smuckers
From everything Bioware has put out I don't think there is a clear better version between the PS3 or 360 version. The only difference for a while was the PS3 version wasn't supposed to ship until later this month but that changed last week to match the release date of the PC and 360 versions.
Askherserenity's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:30
Askherserenity
:[ Pretty low score. Picking this game up in a few minutes. I'm way too excited for it!
Sonvar's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:31
Sonvar
@Jim
That can be said of a lot of games that allow you to save at any time. Save early and often that way a beating doesn't cause you to repeat quite so much.
Snidesworth's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:33
Snidesworth
Sounds like the battles are totally unmanageable on the console versions. If this is the spiritual successor to Baldur's Gate and its ilk then I'm not surprised you need to micromanage so much; that's what you had to do back then and a good part of what made it fun.

On loot, I read another reviewer describe it as "infrequent and meaningful." Did your own experiences match that, Jim, or was it a case of "not enough loot and loot not good enough to justify the spacing?"
Tubatic's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:37
Tubatic
Aw, I heard the 360 version had a few different configurations for group/battle management, I think. Ah well. I loves me a slightly busted game. Picking this up today!
Smuckers's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:41
Smuckers
Thanks Sonvar, looking around it seems folks are sayin that the ps3 version has better textures and color saturation but a fiddly framerate, while the 360 version doesn't look as sharp but plays a bit smoother. So, i don't know which version i'll settle on.

Oh and good review jim.
The Craze's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:42
The Craze
Damn, a shame that it had those kinds of flaws, I guess I was expecting perfection or near enough. I'll still pick it up, and I'm sure I'll still enjoy it, 7.5 ain't half bad. Damn hype machine, gets me every time for these big titles I look forward to for months.
TrueZero's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:43
TrueZero
Picking this up in a few minutes also. A little downed by the mostly negative review (but mostly positive score?) but I am an RPG+Bioware fan so I'm sure it will entertain.

Mass Effect certainly had a lot of gameplay faults (including bad AI and erratic difficulty) but it didn't stop me from playing through it several times.
Jim Sterling's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:45
Jim Sterling
"On loot, I read another reviewer describe it as "infrequent and meaningful." Did your own experiences match that, Jim, or was it a case of "not enough loot and loot not good enough to justify the spacing?""

It was sure as hell infrequent, but meaningful? Not if you like holding onto armor you won't be able to use for another ten hours.
pascuz46's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:46
pascuz46
Hmmm Im not an RPG fan, so this game really wants on my Radar. It more less caught some of my interest however. Its not like I couldn't avoid hearing about it. Either way its a shame it could of been better if they made the combat less frustrating. I really do hate that about videogames in general, some games are so awesome but have a frustrating combat system that just ruins it completely. Im looking at you Assassins Creed and Prince Of Persia!
funran's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:50
funran
Good write up Jim, I think I'll pick it up on PC. Maybe those loading times will be better.
Murumasa123's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:53
Murumasa123
Mabye rent it to see how it is. Are you sure the graphics are OK? I mean the third image looks like a PSP game. Seriously the animation in cutscenes and certain parts looked worse than Sacred 2. Then there's that last image that looks fucking wicked!
PenKaizen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:54
PenKaizen
An interesting and enjoyable read, thanks Jim.
Snidesworth's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:55
Snidesworth
"It was sure as hell infrequent, but meaningful? Not if you like holding onto armor you won't be able to use for another ten hours."

Level restricted loot? Bollocks.
Uziwood's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:55
Uziwood
Acording to various review sites, the PS3 version is superior to the xbox one. I say ps3 owners put your party hats on and do the hoola dance, since this is a premiere!
Bioautographical's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 08:59
Bioautographical
@Snidesworth

It's not level-restricted, but lots of it requires strength stats so high that it might as well be.
Pic0o's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:01
Pic0o
Good Info in this article. Makes me feel a little better about not putting this on my Day 1 radar.

Especially after playing Borderlands all weekend... holy shit that game is great, especially Co-Op.
Maxxthepenguin's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:07
Maxxthepenguin
I appreciate you giving your honest opinion and not giving excuses for a high-profile game, but still, I'm not sure that this review is that useful to the masses of people who know this is a PC game anyways.

You might want to review the PC version too
Velt's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:07
Velt
im picking this one up for the PC, seems to be the way its meant to be played. But who knows, if I get it tomorrow maybe I will be able to talk about it on Monday.
Snidesworth's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:12
Snidesworth
@Bioautographical

Ah, that's different then. Still a little annoying, but not as bad as hard level restrictions. Are the strength restrictions higher for more powerful armour, though, or are all instances of the same armour type (say, plate) given the same strength requirement?
Harkonnen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:13
Harkonnen
"It's worth noting that PC gamers get a more tactical perspective of battle, have access to hotkeys, and can pause the game to issue commands."

What, do you mean you can't pause the game in 360/PS3? You surely got it wrong, or I'm cancelling my preorder.
Magnalon's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:13
Magnalon
Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww. After all the hype, I appreciate an honest review, Jim!

Get this on PC people. The old school zoom out mechanic is worth it alone.
thornier-gravy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:14
thornier-gravy
After reading this and Brutal Legend's review I'm wondering if I should be keeping expectations low for all games seeing every game that I been looking forward to this year really haven't panned out the way I would've hoped.
thornier-gravy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:15
thornier-gravy
Also great review.
PenKaizen's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:21
PenKaizen
@thornier-gravy 7.5 is still pretty good.
Hammersmith's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:21
Hammersmith
I'm still really on the fence about this game.
SirDregan's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:22
SirDregan
oh... no ...
please tell me you're joking and they did make an uber-awesome game and you just want us to be surprised... please?
Brett OConnor's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:24
Brett OConnor
Other reviews state you can pause and issue commands in the console versions.
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:28
Xzyliac
Sooo...should I be happy I didn't buy this today?

I almost did but I got cold feet because I'm not into the setting too much.
scrap's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:30
scrap
You know what really sucks about this game? Paying extra money on release day for content that should have been on the disc. No thanks, Bioware. I do not want your DLC or your sliced-up game.
Shulamm's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:32
Shulamm
Ouch, Jim, that's bad news :(
Itri12's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:35
Itri12
You gave Killzone 2 a 9.5. Enough said. :P
barren_sky's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/03/2009 09:36
barren_sky
The only thing about this review that turns me off is the difficulty spikes. I'm hoping there's an option to play on Easy the first time through.
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 

   Got news?   tips@destructoid.com   |   Dtoid Twitter

New Videos

more videos


Reviews & Previews
BioShock 2 review
Dante's Inferno review
Chime review
Hustle Kings review
iPhone Review Round-up: January review
more reviews
Dawn of War II Chaos Rising
Metro 2033
A trip to the racetracks Days of Thunder Arcade
Double the pleasure, double the fun with Darwinia+
Wizarding world in plastic Lego Harry Potter Years 1-4
more previews


- The Dtoid Army is 56754 strong -

Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

Call for entries: the Areas of my Expertise

New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide


 Originals
Jim Sterling: How Aliens are blatantly better than Predators





















More Destructoid Originals




We are Destructoid   tips@destructoid.com
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Niero
Founder, Big Boss
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Dale North
News Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Destructoid Video EIC
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Brad Nicholson
Managing Editor
Tom Fronczak Colette Bennett
Ashley Davis Ben Perlee
Conrad
Zimmerman
Chad Concelmo
Jonathan Holmes Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Will Maddock Matthew Razak
Josh Tolentino
Joseph Leray
Topher Cantler Samit Sarkar
     
  Adam Dork
Daniel Lingen
Hollie Bennett
Joe Burling
Mikey Turvey






 
 
  get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
contribute a news tip
suggest a feature
be a guest editor
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meetup+play online
seriously

about Destructoid
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator
Despingation?




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006