Quantcast

Review: Crackdown 2

8:00 AM on 07.05.2010   |   Jim Sterling

Review: Crackdown 2 photo

Gamers have been begging for a sequel to Crackdown for years. The original game, developed by Realtime Worlds, became a cult hit due to its surprising and empowering gameplay, not to mention the fact that it came packed with a beta code for Halo 3. Whether it was the former or the latter that led to Crackdown's success is up for debate, but whatever the reason, people loved Crackdown and the announcement of the sequel was cause for celebration. 

Now, after an eternity of waiting, we have Crackdown 2. Now developed by Ruffian Games, this game aims to reproduce the exact same experience as its predecessor, only with more of everything. However, has it "ain't broke, don't fix" approach been a boon or a curse? Just how far can a game provide "more of the same" before it feels like an unnecessary title? What's the difference between a similar experience and a straight up carbon copy?

Crackdown 2, to its discredit, answers all these questions, while leaving one completely unanswered -- exactly what has Ruffian been doing with itself for the past twelve months?

Crackdown 2 (Xbox 360)
Developer: Ruffian Games
Publisher: Microsoft Game Studios
Released: July 6, 2010 
MSRP: $59.99

Crackdown 2 is incredible fun, providing all the thrills, spills and chills of the original Crackdown. It looks gorgeous, it feels empowering, and the collection of Agility Orbs is as addictive as ever. All of this is true... for about ten minutes. After playing the game for several hours (you can beat it in a handful), however, Crackdown 2 essentially is the original Crackdown, only with bad pacing, increased repetition, and far less content overall. 

The game takes place in Pacific City -- the exact same city as the last game -- which has fallen apart since The Agency cleared out the gangs and took control. A new terrorist organization called The Cell has risen to destroy The Agency, while a breed of mutated zombie-like citizens called The Freaks rise from the ground every night to terrorize the people of Pacific City. Obviously, the Agency has to deal with these problems, and as a newly created Agent, the job falls on your shoulders. 

Crackdown 2 puts players in the middle of a three-way war between the Agency's Peacekeepers, the Cell's soldiers, and the Freaks. During the day, players will have to tackle Cell operatives, taking over tactical locations by clearing out a stronghold until Agency air support can arrive. By night, players deal with Freaks, closing up their escape holes by, again, killing everything until Agency helicopters arrive to close block their escape routes. These objectives are optional and only serve to support the game's one main mission thread -- activating "Absorption Units" dotted around the city. 

Absorption Units are part of the Agency's "Project Sunbeam" scheme, which involves sending light beacons underground to destroy the UV-sensitive Freaks. Players have to activate three Absorption Units, then travel to the designated underground location where they have to fight waves and waves of Freaks until the beacon is fully charges. 

That, in a nutshell, explains everything that the player has to do in order to reach the end credits. Whereas Crackdown at least had an illusion of progress and variety with the different gangs and key assassination targets, Crackdown 2's mission structure does away with pretense and just makes players perform the exact same tasks over and over again.

Clearing tactical locations, closing Freak holes, and lighting beacons represent the entire action section of the game, and even though they sound different, they are basically all exactly the same -- kill everything in a certain location in order to win. From the very start of the game to the very end, this never changes. You won't even have any idea how much of the game you've completed without looking at your stats, due to the fact that the game is so repetitive, bland and pointless, any sense of progression just doesn't exist. 

Of course, there are Agility Orbs, Hidden Orbs and Driving Orbs dotted around Pacific City to collect, and stats to increase, but we had those in Crackdown and absolutely nothing has changed. If you are one of the insane people who caught all 500 Agility Orbs in Crackdown, then guess what -- you get to do it all over again! Ruffian has attempted to shake things up with "Renegade" Orbs, although a better name could be "Asshole" Orbs. These are essentially Orbs that run away from you, and require a lot of patience and dexterity to capture. It's a cool idea, but it's one of only a handful of original ones in this entire game. 

As always, teaming up with friends is a crucial element of the Crackdown experience, and they will be essential if the game is to remain enjoyable. For one thing, many areas are so overrun with enemies -- many of which pack rocket or grenade launchers that rapid-fire and home in on you -- that you'll need the backup of at least one other Agent before expecting to get out of a fight unscathed. The game is totally balanced towards co-op and single players will likely have an even worse time than those playing online. For example, one area saw me dying three times before I could beat it. I replayed the same area with two other Agents and it was almost insultingly easy.

Aside from a few token new vehicles and weapons, Crackdown 2 is, by all counts, an expansion pack. It feels like a cliche criticism, and people who often invoke the "expansion" word are wrong, but this game is one of those that definitely qualifies. It's the exact same game, albeit more boring, more repetitive and more frustrating. The redesigned Pacific City, which has taken away the great aesthetic of the first game and replaced it with a look and feel that seems to simply be copying inFAMOUS' Empire City, feels more drab, dull and barren. That was partially what Ruffian was going for, but it only works to the game's detriment, providing a sterile and brown post-apocalyptic look that can be found in dozens of games. 

So basically, Crackdown 2 is a stolen game in a stolen setting. 

What's worse, Crackdown 2 has done such a "great" job of importing the original game that it hasn't fixed a single problem. Sequels usually address and fix known issues, but each irritating flaw of the original Crackdown has been lovingly reproduced in this one. Climbing is still frustrating due to the Agent's random inability to grasp certain surfaces. There are still loads of ledges jutting out from buildings above climbable areas that require players to jump away from a building and then try to "swim" back to a higher ledge, or else otherwise repeatedly bash their head. It's still impossible to tell what can be climbed and what can't, and it's still far too easy to fall from buildings due to the Agent's slippery controls. 

If anything, the climbing issues are worse in Crackdown 2, thanks to the aesthetic redesigns of Ruffian (redesigns meaning they just made everything look worse). Buildings seem even harder to climb, and it's even easier to fall through cracks and holes. 

The targeting system is also completely broken, with the Agent locking onto cars and other non-threatening objects, often multiple times, rather than focus on the Cell operative a foot away from him that's filling his balls with bullets. Some of the missions are broken, too. One tactical location is actually impossible to complete in single-player, because leaving the location's radius causes the mission to be lost. Unfortunately, all the Cell soldiers that need killing at at the top of a building that requires players to leave the radius in order to climb. Without a second player, this mission simply cannot be completed. It's oversights like that are simply inexcusable in a game where the developer did very little of their own original work. 

That's the real crux of the problem with Crackdown 2. With Ruffian Games needing to do very little of its own original development, there is absolutely no excuse for known issues going unfixed, and brand new problems being completely ignored. We're brought back to our original unanswered question -- what the Hell has Ruffian been doing with itself? It used the assets, engine, and gameplay of the original title, giving itself much more time to work on better missions, more varied tasks, and technical fixes. But none of that is present in this sloppy piece of work. At its best, Crackdown 2 is uninspired. At its worst, Crackdown 2 is straight up lazy.

The one thing Ruffian can claim as its own is the PVP competitive multiplayer arenas. Basically, it's Crackdown with players shooting each other, and in all fairness, it's not that bad. It lacks staying power, however, and while my time with it was admittedly limited, what I did play got a bit dreary after a while. With three modes to choose from -- Rocket Tag, Deathmatch and Team Deathmatch -- some players may find plenty to get into, but the announcer's limited stock of phrases and the fact that battles feel rather lifeless, do little to keep the multiplayer aspect something many would want to keep returning to. If anything, all Crackdown 2 should have been was this mode added to the original game as DLC. It's simply not worth buying the full game for this addition.

Ultimately, this game is a very sub-par offering that has no real reason to exist. Everything that is good about Crackdown 2 is already in the original Crackdown, and many of the problems in Crackdown 2 are unique entirely to this installment. In essence, all Crackdown 2 does is take the original game and make it worse. More issues, a duller Pacific City, and mundane gameplay all mount to create one of the most pointless, unnecessary, and insulting "sequels" ever created. Without the wow factor of the original Crackdown, the charm of Crackdown 2 wears off within minutes. 

Just play the demo over and over and over again, because that's pretty much all the full game amounts to. 

Score: 4.5 -- Below Average (4s have some high points, but they soon give way to glaring faults. Not the worst games, but are difficult to recommend.)










More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize. Likes PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3 Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

194 comments | showing # 1 to 50
prev
next 50 comments

AzNheadbanger's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:08
AzNheadbanger
Not surprised considering the original devs made APB instead of Crackdown 2.
AlphaJC's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:08
AlphaJC
The demo felt....empty it really wasn't that great. Well, all 360 has this year is Fable 3 and Halo:reach. I honestly think those will be the only 2 good 1st party exclusive games this year. O well there gears next year.
waypoetic's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:09
waypoetic
Ha!
Leo Loikkanen's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:11
Leo Loikkanen
Not suprised becauce Jim Sterling is an uppity teen without a journalistic degreeeeeeeee.





Weeeeezzzzzzsssstleeeeyyyyyyy.
BrandonUndead's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:11
BrandonUndead
I played the demo for about 45 seconds before deciding the targeting system was hopelessly broken. That's a dealbreakah!
covah's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:12
covah
RUH OH!

And I don't really care... I got rid of the first game awhile ago and just want some more Crackdown action now. So if its just the first game plus zombies, cool, whatever.
covah's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:12
covah
RUH OH!

And I don't really care... I got rid of the first game awhile ago and just want some more Crackdown action now. So if its just the first game plus zombies, cool, whatever.
SoxFan13's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:12
SoxFan13
Jim, I don't envy you and the reaction that will probably show up here. Loved the review, though. A-hole orbs! Don't they sell those at Lover's Lane?
Totally Tubular Thomas's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:13
Totally Tubular Thomas
More like Crackdown Poo
Kylius's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:16
Kylius
Lazy gameplay decisions ruin games; the original Crackdown, Assassin's Creed are two key examples.

If there's no carrot at the end of that boring gameplay stick (involving storyline, empowerment with increased stats) then it just won't cut it in today's market.

Unfortunately Jim's review is exactly what I feared would come from the sequel.

Great write-up as usual Mr Sterling - I can tell from the tone of your writing that this one has genuinely disappointed you, there's none of the flippancy and spooge jokes that usually crop up - so you must be pretty bummed!
Jonathan Holmes's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:17
Jonathan Holmes
I didn't have a good time with the multiplayer demo at PAX East, but I was hoping that the campaign mode would be better.

HOPE IS STUPID.

Guess I'll stick to Sin and Punishment 2 for my "be a superhero who's constantly blowing stuff up with a machine gun" needs.
Alfarin's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:17
Alfarin
...Ouch.

Did not see that coming, must say.
Hammersmith's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:19
Hammersmith
I saw this coming. One thing I'm surprised about is the mention of good visuals. While playing the demo I thought it was a muddy brown mess. It looks like an Xbox 1 title. The original looked better.
Bacchus's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:19
Bacchus
4.5 is the new 7.
dangeRUSS04's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:20
dangeRUSS04
well if its not the saboteur, (Which was terrible by the way) jim doesn't like it
manasteel88's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:23
manasteel88
from what I got out of the demo I heartily agree.
Themightylebeau2009's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:25
Themightylebeau2009
IF THIS ONE ON 360 IT WOULD GET A HIG....oh wait.

I couldnt get the demo, but heard enough mediocre things to put me off the full game. Might give it a rent though.
Caspulex's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:26
Caspulex
@Leo

I do believe Mr. Butlertron calls everyone "Wesley", not "Westly."

Also, bleh. I played the demo for the whole half hour and realized it was exactly what Jim said it was. And I still have Crackdown 1, and it's just as fun to Keys to the City into insanely-overpowered mode and just pistol whip people across the city.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:29
Chris Carter
@Jim
Not only can you play the demo over and over again, but you can glitch it, and play indefinitely.
Ross's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:31
Ross
@Magnalon
It's been patched.
Cynical Gamer's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:34
Cynical Gamer
I was just about to pre-order this from Amazon. Thanks Jim for saving me 60 bucks!
stomm's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:37
stomm
Shame, was really looking forward to this. The original game was good but suffered from glitches which obviously look to be back.

I don't really play co-op either so there's no point getting this game now.
watermanx's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:38
watermanx
played the demo and it was alright but hoped for it to be better in the full game, time to cancel my preorder.
Wintersocks's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:39
Wintersocks
@Magnalon

Woah, we rocking the newb avatar now? What happened to your old one?
Gilthalas's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:39
Gilthalas
Demo didn't really impress me so I'm not surprised by this review.
Sexualchocolate's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:39
Sexualchocolate
Game I expected to be pretty shit is pretty shit.

Wowzers.

Entertaining review Jimbo, have my babies.
Peekachu99's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:40
Peekachu99
Yes, Jim is controversial - but at times he's also right. The demo did nothing to sell me on the game, nothing at all. And I'm sorry, call me a graphics whore, but I didn't spend 3 grand on a television just to play upscaled Xbox games, and that's what it looked like. Perhaps, it was simply more forgivable with the original CD, but in 2010? C'mon.

I think Jim missed the boat on this element of the review, but the rest sounds spot on.
30sec's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:41
30sec
Did anyone really think this game was going to be worth a shit after playing that demo? Come the fuck on...
El Edito's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:42
El Edito
Im still buying it, 4.5 or not.

Eurogamer give it an 8 so who are you supposed to believe?

I'd be interested to see you review Singularity, imo one of the best FPS i've played in a long time.
garethxxgod's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:44
garethxxgod
This is one 360 exclusive that kinda sucks balls. Since I recently got a 360 I played both the first and second games demos and I was pretty unimpressed.

Atleast games like Prototype which is pretty repetative itself actually offers the player control of a guy with incredible powers. Crackdown to me seems uninspired.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:48
Chris Carter
@Winter
I can't get my old one back due to a glitch! It just deleted itself randomly.

@Br1ghtside
Don't patch :p
smang's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:50
smang
odd, most of the problems highlighted here i thought were abundantly present in the first game.

if i recall, that game, while fun, was just the same, "shoot 100 bad guys and a boss" over and over. no variation in mission structure at all, and no incentives to use the vehicles in the game either.
Jack8274's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:52
Jack8274
@El Edito

Play the demo and decide for yourself. As most of the people in the comments stated, you can see most of the faults from the demo.
Ross's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:53
Ross
@Magnalon
You have to be connected to live to do the glitch. So there! :P
Nortonantivirus's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:54
Nortonantivirus
@Peekachu99
All console games are upscaled, even PS3 games. Look it up. There isn't a true 1080p console game on the market. If you want true 1080p, go PC.

As for Crackdown 2, those orbs sound like a bitch.
ScottyG's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 08:59
ScottyG
This makes me sad. Although I guess I shouldn't be surprised... I really wanted to like the original Crackdown, but it's just so shallow. :(
MyBlasterRunsHot's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 09:01
MyBlasterRunsHot
You did a great job of justifying your review score. Awesome read as well. =D
Globox82's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 09:02
Globox82
great review Jim
Kuwanjahbee's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 09:03
Kuwanjahbee
loved the review jim. Sad to see a game not live up to its potential

@El Edito: You can believe who you want. I'm going to believe jim because he's normally only off by a point max in my opinion

and as far as singularity goes. It's a solid shooter, that feels and plays like the original bioshock. so decent game? yeah. but it's a 7 max.
Peekachu99's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 09:03
Peekachu99
@ Norton, that's untrue. There are a variety of games on both the 360 and PS3 (think the PS3 has a few more) that are native 1080p - check the forums on beyond 3D if you want to verify this.

And the "upscaling" bit wasn't in reference to the screen rez anyhow - the game looks like shit (to me). That's what I was saying.

I have a nice rig anyhow, but I use that for MMOs. Tera can't come soon enough! :)
CormactheMac87's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 09:05
CormactheMac87
I never played crackdown 1 but I actually really liked the demo. I know it has it problems but I thought the game was fun, especially in co-op. This is a definite buy for me. Good review Jim.
Mikebot 3000's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 09:08
Mikebot 3000
This is what I was expecting after playing the demo. Solid review. Thanks for saving me $60.
Kuwanjahbee's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 09:09
Kuwanjahbee
@cormac

I advise a rent first seeing as how it's short and has no replay value really. Spending 10$ is a whole lot better than 65
CormactheMac87's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 09:14
CormactheMac87
@ Kuwanjahbee

Thanks for the heads up. Either il rent or wait for the inevitable price drop in a couple of weeks. Im actually really surprised you cant play on after you complete the game, thats kinda crazy
Scroll's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 09:14
Scroll
I might still get it eventually whether or not it got a 4.5..

But right now UFC warrants my money more than this.
Ramalho's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 09:21
Ramalho
"Crackdown 2: More of Crackdown" is actually fine with me...Am I weird?
Nyktharas's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 09:22
Nyktharas
I still stand by my opinion that the only reason the first Crackdown sold so much was the Halo 3 beta that was included in it, it wasn't all that great of a game.

The second one sounds like it's more of the same, except this time it doesn't have something to make the Halo fans buy it in droves. I'll give it a go though, I know my buddy will buy it. I don't expect much from it so maybe I won't be as disappointed.
KIDA26's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 09:23
KIDA26
I didn't like the demo... it felt like an empty shell of its former self. I'd be angry if I was Realtime Worlds.
gnosisispower's Avatar - Comment posted on 07/05/2010 09:23
gnosisispower
Gutted, I am. Not just Jim's review, mind...I absolutely love Crackdown 1 (LOVE IT) but felt somewhat letdown by the sequel's demo. So, I popped in the original and had FAR more fun. Completely agree with the change in art direction being of detriment. Crackdown was a multicoloured joy-fest and the dark aesthetic deployed in 2 just isn't as visually appealing.

Still, absolutely gutted that the demo for this sequel is a true reflection of the full game - was kinda hoping they'd held something something back...but no :(

Nay, mind.,..I can always just replay the first game (over and over). But I will still be waiting for a true sequel to emerge (so maybe I should buy 2 just to support Ruffian...maybe). That said, the demo had a few cool things going for it - the zombies were fun to run over, and the car that could climb walls was pretty sweet.

BTW, apparently, Ruffian only had an 8 month turnaround on this title, not a three year dev cycle...so, that's that.

Peace out, y'all
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!