The biggest game of the year is finally here. Infinity Ward created one of the most popular, well-crafted and subsequently imitated first-person-shooter games in Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare and a sequel was inevitable. Two years on and we have Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, a game that aims to be bigger, sexier, and more full of explosions than Call of Duty 4 ever was.
A year of controversy and hype preceded it. A year of debate and rage and more marketing dollars than any reasonable human being could conceive. With the game in our hands, however, it is time to put such things aside and ask the only question that really matters: Just how good is the biggest game of 2009?
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (PC, PS3, Xbox 360 [Reviewed] Developer: Infinity Ward Publisher: Activision MSRP: $59.99
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is set five years after Call of Duty 4. Imran Zakhaev is dead, but he has left behind a terrible legacy. His death made him a martyr in the eyes of the Russian Ultranationalists, and his former lieutenant Vladimir Makarov has embarked on a campaign of terror across Europe. America fights a covert war against Makarov, but in doing so sparks a chain of events that has unspeakable consequences for the rest of the free world, not to mention Task Force 141, a unit of British soldiers who continue the pursuit of Makarov and find themselves embroiled in a conflict that's more than Good Guys vs. Bad Guys.
Infinity Ward has proven that it can create interactive setpieces like no other, and there is no denying that the single-player campaign for Modern Warfare 2 is a roller coaster ride that never lets up. Its individual plot points are intense, jawdropping, surprising and, in some cases, deeply disturbing. Its story about hard-bitten men who do awful things in the name of freedom is a resonant and supremely promising one, and not a single level goes by without something truly memorable happening. As a collection of events, Modern Warfare 2 is without compare.
As a coherent story, however, the game slips up. Infinity Ward has no equal when it comes to self-contained, interactive narrative elements, but the studio fails at pulling the drawstrings together to create a flowing plot that makes sense. The game is so focused on giving us the next big explosion that nothing is allowed to build to a crescendo. Huge plot points come and go in a matter of seconds, and things that should be consequential and important get lost in the mass of shockers and endless twists. The overall story becomes a garbled mess that makes very little sense, which is amazing considering how well crafted each individual chapter actually is.
The overall plot may be inane and poorly stitched together, but Modern Warfare 2's campaign is something that has to be played. Taking the best parts of every FPS you've ever experienced and then making them even more amazing, Modern Warfare 2 provides consistent entertainment and fantastically paced gameplay that has no rival. It's like five Hollywood action movies smashed into each other on a busy road and Modern Warfare 2 was the result of the messy collision. Despite a short length of just five hours, the single-player mode packs in more adrenaline-pumping sequences, unforgettable climaxes and truly shocking scenes than most games that run twice as long.
As far as the actual gameplay goes, Modern Warfare 2 is a vast improvement over previous titles in the Call of Duty series. The horrible design decision that saw enemies respawning until you got to specific map locations has all but been eradicated, with many levels now rewarding you for staying put and using cover, rather than running through a level and hoping for the best. Cheap grenade spam is also cut down to a minimum, and players seem to have a better chance of evading the explosives that do come their way. Death can still comes come seemingly from nowhere, helped by the fact that enemies will jump you from behind and hide on rooftops, and sometimes new game elements are quickly thrown at the player without warning, but the frustration levels are down to a bare minimum and deaths are nearly always the fault of the player, rather than the result of six grenades.
There's plenty of variety, too, and no one level ever stays the same for long. One moment you'll be slowly picking your way through a blizzard, stealthily eliminating soldiers. Seconds later you're blowing stuff up and mowing down enemies while trying to escape a military base. A few more seconds later and you're on a snowmobile, tearing down a slope and trying not to collide with fanatic pursuers. The game constantly changes on the player, and it's never short on surprises. It truly is a must-play experience, even if one has to ignore the ludicrous plot at times to get into it.
Backing up the single-player is, of course, the online multiplayer. This is where the length of the campaign is more than made up for, with Infinity Ward building upon the excellent work started in Call of Duty 4. Everything awesome about the first game (sans dedicated servers on PC, of course) is present and correct in Modern Warfare 2, but refined and built upon where appropriate to provide an experience with more feedback, more rewards and more satisfaction than before.
The Perks system returns with a whole mass of new abilities to help give dedicated players an edge in battle. Old favorites like "Stopping Power" and "Sleight of Hand" return, but are backed up by new "Pro" variants. Continued use of Perks allows them to become "Pro," providing even more abilities. The revitalized Perk system helps cut down on grenade spam by including fresh equipment abilities. These equipment items swap the grenades for potentially more useful items, like a tactical insertion flare that allows the player to choose where they'd like to respawn. Not only are these items unique and fun, but the choice between using them and using grenades is a brilliant idea that cuts down on potential frustration and forces grenade spammers to sacrifice a potentially superior inventory.
A new quasi-Perk known as the Death Streak has also been added. Death Streaks kick in when a player is consistently killed by enemies, and provide temporary health boosts, the ability to copy the enemy's character class, Martyrdom, and more.
Kill Streaks are back, and bigger than ever. They can now be customized, so if a player doesn't want a helpful care package to drop when they've killed four players in a single spawn, they can spend points to unlock a UAV Jammer and swap it out. Some of the new Kill Streaks are incredible, but run a risk of being a tad overpowering. The Predator, for example, is a deadly area-of-effect missile that can be manually controlled to land on a group of players. Unlocked after only five kills, it's an incredibly powerful and annoying weapon, perhaps best saved for higher streaks.
The Perks and Streaks are terrific fun, but the game definitely seems more reliant on them than Call of Duty 4 was. Newcomers can expect to be overwhelmed by players with superior weapons and abilities, since they're no longer small helpful add-ons but truly game-changing items. A few hours of play will see most players finding the right weaponry and perk set to help them survive, but it's rough early going.
One of the best parts of the multiplayer is the amount of feedback one receives during a match. Players are informed whenever they pull of particularly cool feats like double kills or headshots, and are told when they've gotten "payback" kills on the person who beat them last. Players also receive post-match Accolades for such accomplishments as gaining the most knife kills, or successfully firing from the hip more than anybody else. These awards and messages constantly encourage the player through positive reinforcement, while the simple cosmetic aspect of them makes the game feel more exciting and action packed than last time.
Add to that the huge amount of maps, which range from small to huge, the ability to unlock and use various callsigns and emblems for the in-game lobby, and the most welcome addition of all -- blessed host migration, and you have a fantastic online package full of things to unlock, missions to accomplish and people to kill. It takes everything about Call of Duty 4's multiplayer and dips it in sugar. For first-person-shooter fans, it's a treat that's hard to find fault with, and will last for a ludicrously long time.
A few new multiplayer modes have been thrown in, the most radical being a third-person mode that makes Modern Warfare 2 look more like Gears of War or Uncharted. Unfortunately, using controls designed for an FPS perspective in a third-person mode is absolutely horrible. It looks terrific, but plays terribly, and is worth little more than a curious one-play peek. It's a cute novelty, in any case.
The content overload continues with the new Spec Op mode, a series of challenges that can be tackled solo or with a friend. These range from obstacle courses, to sniper sieges, to simple "Kill everything that moves as quickly as possible." There's plenty of variety and should keep co-op fans happy, but I personally found the challenges overshadowed by the single-player and multiplayer, and have found it difficult to get into them.
All this content is made to look pretty by some really stunning graphics. Modern Warfare 2 looks vastly superior to its predecessor, mostly thanks to a more vibrant color palette and some beautifully well-lit environments. There is great shadow and contrast, with the airport multiplayer map particularly standing out for its brightness and complete lack of the color brown. Sound-wise, you know what to expect. Endless machine gun noise punctuated by gruff men shouting "Alpha, Bravo" and "Stay frosty," at one another. If you hate military speak, you might want to turn the volume down, but you'd miss out on a very rousing soundtrack.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is a game that truly lives up to the title of "Game of the year." It carries itself with the style and swagger of a blockbuster action movie, it remains fully committed to making the player feel exhilarated and satisfied every step of the way, and not once, not ever, does it ever slow down. It's one of the most superbly paced games ever developed, and is packed so full of content and awe-inspiring gameplay that only somebody with standards higher than human comprehension could feel cheated.
If the campaign's story was shaped better and made more sensible, and if the online Perks were just a tiny bit more balanced, this would be a near-perfect game, no shadow of a doubt. As it stands, however, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is an utterly stellar achievement that knows exactly what its audience wants, and delivers in abundance. Truly, this is the biggest game of 2009.
Score: 9.5-- Superb (9s are a hallmark of excellence. There may be flaws, but they are negligible and won't cause massive damage to what is a supreme title.)
Jim Sterling serves as reviews editor for Destructoid.com, head of the Podtoid podcast, and produces a number of news stories, original features, one-of-a-kind videos. With his passionate argumentative style, controversial opinions, harsh delivery, and dedication to brutal honesty Sterling is a name that you can't help but recognize.
Likes
PS2, iPod Touch, Silent Hill 2, Metal Gear Solid, Dynasty Warriors 3
Meet the rest of the team
NOT A 10/10!! I CALL BIA... oh wait, this multiplatform, lol. I was expecting a review like this, a high score. But I have to ask: what happened to multiple editor's reviews. I like your review Jim, and it was very thorough, but I'd like to see what the rest of Destructoid has to say about it. In any case, I wish I had a current gen console to get this game. Oh well...
I'm nearing the end of the first Act in the PC version and while I'm having fun the removal of leaning is such a stupid move on Infinity Ward's part that I can't fully wrap my head around the stupidity. There are so many points through the game already where I could've survived if I could just use lean to peak my head over to snipe somebody. I hope to God some unofficial SP mod is made that includes leaning, 'cause it's so annoying not having it. The fact that enemies don't endlessly respawn anymore is certainly a plus. Multiplayer is a joke and a sham though.
Well at least I know all the people hounding me at work for it are getting a good product. Personally I'll save my pennies for stuff like Space Invaders Extreme 2.
Fuck you, I'm poor and the first game was a masterpiece.
Great review, love the Dark Knight soundtrack to augment it (love Hans Zimmer)
I agree wholeheartedly, although - just personal opinion - 9.5 is a tad high due to the single player campaign being a bit too short as well as the story being subpar.
But then again, scores mean very little to me, the review itself is what matters and again I couldn't of said it better.
As someone who doesn't care at all about online multiplayer, Modern Warfare 1 and 2 are textbook definitions of must rent titles for me. I borrowed the first one from a friend and really enjoyed the excellent but short single player campaign. I'll burn through this in one or two sittings, probably enjoy the hell out of it, and never touch it again.
Awesome double team on the review Ray & Jim - I agree 100% with it.
I'm glad you pointed out how every level has at least one sequence with a mind-blowing cinematic quality to it, not enough reviews have given credit to IW for that.
Highlight so far: Storming the Gulag by helicopter with a fighter escort. A completely inconsequential, non-interactive sequence - but something about it stirred my stomach good and proper.
I'm still unsure whether to get this or skip it. Now without a console, it's gotta be on PC if I get it, and there's been plenty of shit thrown around about that version.
Great review. Its a game I would like to try some day. Unfortunately I don't have the funds, or a 360/ps3. I did enter the contest to try to win the xbox360/MW2, but I am pretty sure I lost:(. I wish you would announce the winners.
Quick question: Do you need to play COD 4 first, or will I be fine without playing COD 4 first?
I also second loogibot's call for multiple editor reviews. If there's a general consensus amongst the editors, maybe there could be one primary reviewer and two or three supporting blurbs along with a personal score?
If that's you also doing the video review, Jim, I'm surprised no one has commended you on doing a pretty well American accent (or lack thereof, - accent I mean.)
If not, disregard that. Whoever it is sounds sort of like alternative universe Sterling.
Anyhow, COD:MW2 looks pretty cool, but I think I'll wait a little while.
RE: Multi-writer reviews. It was decided a while ago that we were moving away from those, due to time issues, making sure everyone can get a copy, and general taste preferences. Neither myself nor Niero particularly like them, and we've had problems with them running stupidly long and people not reading them.
I appreciate some people like them, but it's something we've stepped away from to provide more timely and more readable reviews.
Unlocked it on Steam PC last night (I know, I know, hate on my because i bought it for PC) and I have to say that i'm a little over halfway through the campaign and I've had more "HOLY SHIT" moments in single missions than in entire games. Jim's right though about the plot, it serves little more than to kind of link the missions together. I haven't got around to multiplayer yet but I'll be doing that tonight. I like playing epic games like this on PC since crouched over a mouse and keyboard with headphones for some reason makes everything more intense for me. I played CoD4 on Xbox before PC and still found PC to be much more intense despite the fact that I had already played through the game.
Great review Jim, and I totally agree with the score thus far. It's nearly flawless. The plot, while interesting if you really want to follow it, doesn't really do anything but provide nice cutscenes during loading screens.
If you're willing to play a console version, you wouldn't have a problem with the PC version. PC guys are complaining that it's too much like a console game.
Already checked, all I can find are people whining that "GAMESPOT GAVE IT A 9 OMG". The poster then says that all would be better had it been given a 9.5. Yeah, getting angry over half a point. I wonder if he could explain the EXACT qualites of MW2 that make it deserving of another half a point. Probably not.
i find it funny when ppl call bias on a review that is NOT a perfect game and therefore doesn't deserve a perfect score. but all flaws aside, MW2 is an excellent, must-buy game... on consoles
What?! It deserves at least a 9.7! Giant Bomb gave it 5/5, I think this review's score system is broken, so it's just not accurate.
I also think that you're just not good at playing games, and the writing is obviously bad (I of course didn't read more than the bottom line and score).
So that you Jim, the most biased person on the whole internet, should review this game, is absolutely stupid! But reviews doesn't matter anyway, I know trolls like Jim writes these types of bad reviews just to get hits.
I think I agree with you. But, I also agree with Jim's 7.5/"this thing's got issues" review.
One could then ponder if refining a well trod genre (shooters) is more valuable than revisiting and modernizing a niche genre (high fantasy tactical RPGs)...
Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?
Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!
I can see how it's well made, I guess with the campaign and the multiplayer, I just haven't been able to get into it. I STILL HAS PERKS TO UNLOCK!
Fuck you, I'm poor and the first game was a masterpiece.
Well, if you say its a must play, I guess I can pencil it in for December...
I agree wholeheartedly, although - just personal opinion - 9.5 is a tad high due to the single player campaign being a bit too short as well as the story being subpar.
But then again, scores mean very little to me, the review itself is what matters and again I couldn't of said it better.
this rubbish you call journalism
I'm glad you pointed out how every level has at least one sequence with a mind-blowing cinematic quality to it, not enough reviews have given credit to IW for that.
Highlight so far: Storming the Gulag by helicopter with a fighter escort. A completely inconsequential, non-interactive sequence - but something about it stirred my stomach good and proper.
Quick question: Do you need to play COD 4 first, or will I be fine without playing COD 4 first?
If not, disregard that. Whoever it is sounds sort of like alternative universe Sterling.
Anyhow, COD:MW2 looks pretty cool, but I think I'll wait a little while.
I appreciate some people like them, but it's something we've stepped away from to provide more timely and more readable reviews.
Great review Jim, and I totally agree with the score thus far. It's nearly flawless. The plot, while interesting if you really want to follow it, doesn't really do anything but provide nice cutscenes during loading screens.
If you're willing to play a console version, you wouldn't have a problem with the PC version. PC guys are complaining that it's too much like a console game.
Dragon Age is undisputed GOTY.
Already checked, all I can find are people whining that "GAMESPOT GAVE IT A 9 OMG". The poster then says that all would be better had it been given a 9.5. Yeah, getting angry over half a point. I wonder if he could explain the EXACT qualites of MW2 that make it deserving of another half a point. Probably not.
And here I thought Sterling was the only jerk on the site. Well played.
I also think that you're just not good at playing games, and the writing is obviously bad (I of course didn't read more than the bottom line and score).
So that you Jim, the most biased person on the whole internet, should review this game, is absolutely stupid! But reviews doesn't matter anyway, I know trolls like Jim writes these types of bad reviews just to get hits.
Have a good day!
Bias.
Why did we get to hear your lovely British voice on the video? I'm upset now.
I think I agree with you. But, I also agree with Jim's 7.5/"this thing's got issues" review.
One could then ponder if refining a well trod genre (shooters) is more valuable than revisiting and modernizing a niche genre (high fantasy tactical RPGs)...