im buying this shit, i fucking hate games where you got to shoot like 20 fucking bullets to kill a player, like the conduit,killzone 2, thats why i play hardcore mode on call of duty. and even that mode is shit at times.
I hope people who are even somewhat curious about this game to give the demo a shot, the mechanics are enough to be different than other FPS games, yet still familiar enough to easily pick up. I'm only defending it because I had a good time with the demo, so take that at face value. I'll be getting the full game soon. Who knows, maybe the full price game removes fun somehow. >_> If anyone else gets it, hit me up on XBLA: Ramstein(add Dtoid in the message so I don't ignore it).
I still love you Jim!
Good Fair Review.
The matchmaking is a bit rough around the edges, sometimes I'll have to wait a minute or two before I even connect to the game and it certainly could use a party system (however I guess using the same clan tags works essentially the same).
If this were a full retail game this would be pretty terrible, but for a $15 XBLA game I have to say it is worth it for any FPS who is looking for a fix until their game of choice (Halo/MoH/etc) arrives in the fall.
Translation: Look for a review that you want to agree with, and then make your purchasing decisions based off that.
@epic-koryuken: Do I see a Friday Night Fights happening?! OH SNAP!
After playing for an hour, I was definitely sold on it and I imagine most people will make up their own minds after that time, honestly I wouldn't read any review for this game just for the fact you get a taste of the full experience at no charge.
COD and Gears are also shooters... Anyways, what's the highest score Jim gave to a game? And has he ever given a game 10 out of 10 score?
I was really interested in this game when it was first announced but after seeing it in action, and seeing how quickly you die, I'm glad I didn't buy it.
Having said that, however, I feel this review was a little harsh. While, yes, there are some glaring flaws (Black Ops terrible, Spawn camping), the gameplay itself is pretty fun! The visor mode really helps rat out campers, and once you upgrade some of the digi-grenade stuff/guns, the game starts to feel better and more refined. The only thing I really wish it had was a Lobby system and some options for your HUD, like removing the stupid border that's supposed to be your helmet or whatever. Just cuts off the PoV and makes it harder to play.
Though I will agree; Tango Down did not live up to expectations. I thought it would be much better than it is, but for fifteen bucks? I might just download it for when I get bored of Halo 3 and Left 4 Dead.
Seriously, just download the demo. It's limited to an hour but 30 minutes in I was sold. I'm sure by that same time you will, or won't be, as well. Now where did I put those 1200MSPoints...
I wouldn't call making a joke my "trolling" anyone. I'd love a cataloged list of all these instances where I "trolled" anybody who ever mentioned another review though. If you can back the claim up, I'm all ears!
I hadn't even heard of this game before now and it already has a rabid fanbase.
It's not so much that there's a rabid fanbase for this game as much as there is a rabid fanbase against Jim.
Hence why comments like "Oh, Jim's reviewing the game? I advise you guys to read a few more reviews before passing judgement. It might not be the next CoD, but its not a 3," are made completely void of any real substance to the game at hand and instead focus squarely on the fact that Jim wrote the review.
It's kind of sad really. Jim you suck. And you know why? Because you don't dish out 10's. I mean have you ever given anything a 10? If you didn't then clearly your suckage has been proven. And if you did well you still suck. Because I, random whiny person on the internet #475986, said you do.
And everyone knows that little number is what can make or break the universe. So hopefully if I keep up my childish antics you'll change your scores which will in turn validate the opinion I already hold and keep the globe spinning. Completely ignoring the fact that a review is written not to validate any preconceived notion or approve of any opinion already held by the reader but is instead an analysis of anothers opinion that may or may not reflect the readers but is in no way meant to disapprove of the readers opinion. Instead it's an insight into another view completely void of any efforts to harm the view already set by the audience or to sway them. Rather it's a statement to be taken with as much face value as the reader puts into it but not a command.
No, see, that makes too much sense. Instead I'll keep bitching until I get my way like a 5 year old.
At least people are identifying themselves accordingly.
I was never one to give much weight to a review(done by *anyone* since way back when I was a wee boy 'reading' Nintendo Power) nor to govern my game purchases based on reviews(the last time I did that was Jim's glowing review of Demon Souls, which in turn, I didn't much care for. $60 less in my pocket and a valuable lesson learned) so I an not the type to /RAGE whenever someone agrees/disagrees with a game I liked/disliked.
I think people see a Dtoid Review as a Destructoid(the entire site/community) Review (even though it's just a single person's opinion) and think 'Well shit, everyone on Dtoid hates the game I liked/loved! So they might get a little angry. Jim could give my favorite franchise of all time(Half-Life) a zero out of ten and I would still not rage. But that's because I am a reasonable person. That and Jim Sterling is my favorite DToid Staff. He gets paid to troll noobs, my ideal job! <3
TL;DR: I am saddened that Jim didn't like the game. I did, so I will enjoy it and hope others at the very least, try the demo. Can't we all just get along? Etc,.
The game is really enjoyable. This review should be redone. Instead of being the bias piece of shit that it is.
So if people disagree with a review they aren't supposed to comment? The reason there are comments for every story/review/etc is to create discussion for the topic of choice, whether it be positive or negative. It's not supposed to be all comments praising how great of a job he/she did reviewing the game.
He had a few relevant points but was incredibly off base on the presentation and gameplay. There's a very noticeable notification on screen when you unlock new content, and the menus are very simple and straightforward; I had absolutely no trouble managing my loadouts and equipment.
Also as for the instant deaths that is the furthest from an every-time occurrence, yeah if you turn a corner and there's someone blasting shots at you from point-blank range, you are supposed to be killed. The range on the weapons is suspicious at times, but both MW2 and BC2 have these same suspicions. He completely failed to mention that your armor has an effect on your starting health and can either boost/lower depending on your equipment.
The review in general seems like it came after only a really short time of play and was quite rushed.
saying something is okay for the price is never good to say
this game is bad then again no one cares what i say
"what's the highest score Jim gave to a game? And has he ever given a game 10 out of 10 score?"
Yep: Deadly Premonition.
I played it at a friend's house, nothing amazing but it seemed alright and the customization was pretty cool. It's not a BAD game by any means, just wholly generic FPS action. I had more fun playing it than MW2, anyway
As it has the exact same controls as MW2, which are standard across most FPS' nowadays.
My gloves are back on and I'm happy we could discuss it properly like gents.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow




















follow


