Hover jet. HOVER JET. JET that HOVERS. A jet that you can jump in, scream towards the middle base at full throttle, then gently settle down between the buildings to secure your base.
The majority of the BF3 playerbase probably got the DLC for free. EA is making dat moneys though.
The handful of new weapons are nice, but it's already becoming a rarity to see anything being used but the FAMAS.
...and I still don't understand the animosity for this review. I can tell some of the responses are sarcastic because were all postmodern and stuff but what the hell?
The B2K maps are CLEARLY the best in the game. They're the only ones that have really given me the "battlefield" feel. It's not just Conquest Assault, it's the proper mix of CQC and open-map combat.
Also, I preordered this game for $40 on Amazon, and got these maps for free. I would not pay $15 for them, even though I have said they're the best maps. For me, they were included in the game, and so I can't complain since that's the way it should be. Your review is still very childish, and from what I read, I find it difficult to believe you played for more than an hour.
A common gripe I have with the game is the desaturation and color filters on every map. However, you said B2K strips the maps of their color, which is hilarious, since in BF2 they were predominantly BROWN, and only brown. These are an improvement, and while Wake Island certainly doesn't "pop" with its tropical theme, you're kind of full of shit.
Basically, I disagree with most all of your points, and think Dtoid is becoming more journalistically bankrupt every day. I weep for those who still use this site to base their opinions and purchasing decisions off of.
That being said, I hate that bf always includes the dlc as massive updates then makes you pay to unlock it, I understand that the people who don't buy the packs need a way to display new weapons, etc. and when you actually buy it, as Allistair mentions, it makes that use of space actually worth having.
Having not bought the Vietnam update for BF2, I was pretty furious when I tried to jump on for a few matches and was met with a massive update that I would never and never intended on using.
Also pulling off 450 yard headshots on Gulf Of Oman is the best feeling ever
What system are you on? I know the ps3 peeps to be quite active and I only have a few on my friends list. Would like to add more speaking of which, if you got ps3 and bf3 add me. Psn is same as DTOID
Seriously, It's a map pack for a video game. If don't like it, make your peace and move along. If you do, then stop arguing your personal opinion and go play the damn game.
You didn't preorder/don't feel like paying/don't even like Battlefield? Cool story. Not worth arguing about with people who did/do.
As for the new Jet, it does play differently. I'm not an ace pilot, but as soon I jumped in one, I felt the turning circle was tighter, the speed was slower. You're right, though, that difference just isn't there with the new Tank and Buggy (sans its firing line).
The new weapons aren't great. They're pretty poor to mess around with; they're fairly inaccurate, and they don't have the stopping power.
I've enjoyed it, though. The complexity and chaos of the urban areas pretty much dominate some of the weaker and easily exploitable originals, and adding more destructibilty to unpredictable surroundings. It's a solid map pack for me, only because 3 of the 4 maps rectify a few misgivings I had about BF3's originals.
That, and well, I had the Ltd. Edition, so I guess I didn't lose out in the proceedings. £15 is far too much; 800 points should have been the max price.
http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/627/627218/battlefield-2-20050619033815514-000.jpg. If anything, bf3 is looking less like dog poo.
How can you not notice the new vehicles? How is gulf of oman a weak wake island? They are pretty mucht exact replica's of the old maps.. which were old favorites. LOL. And they remodelled the old weapons, so they ARE new. Just because they are the same make and model doesnt mean they literally just copied and pasted it from bf2.
It has become painfully obvious that you have not spent alot of time on this. Just as it was with Jim's review (his stats were just pathetic, fact).
Before anyone throws the whole OPINION argument at me, let me tell you something. Not every opinion makes sense. If you say that BF3 looks like crap, ok, that's a perfectly fine opinion to have. But if you proceed by saying "remember the days when it didnt", when it clearly looked even more brown in the past, then your opinion is based on GIBBERISH.
Lastly, reviewers are expected to look at facts. Which means that you share your opinion ONCE you have spent an adequate amount of time to explore all the content.
It is painfully obvious that you haven't spent much time with it,
I cannot wait to see if I'm right.
I'm one of those guys that likes both MW, and BF games btw.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow





















follow


