Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


PSN plans premium subscriptions, online play remains free photo

Earlier today, we reported on news that Sony was planning to generate revenue from a new subscription model on the PlayStation Network. The bad news is, it looks like the PSN is indeed going the "Xbox Live" route some time in the future. The good news, however, is that it won't affect online play. Phew!

"SCE will further increase sales by offering users new entertainment through the combination of hardware, software, peripheral and PlayStation Network," states Sony overlord Kaz Hirai. "Especially in the online area, we are studying the possibility of introducing a subscription model, offering premium content and services, in addition to the current free services."

So, the meat of it is that online play will remain free, but that it will be added to with this new subscription that Sony's hoping to conjure, whatever that may entail. Hopefully it will be like Qore -- inherently useless, meaning people who just want to play online won't feel they're missing something.

It will be interesting finding out exactly how Sony expects to swindle some cash for itself with this new venture.


Continue: More Sony stories





prev
next 50 comments

68 comments | showing # 1 to 50

Everyday Legend's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:22
Everyday Legend
Fanboy rainstorm in 5...4...3...2...
Strandli's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:26
Strandli
I think a PSN subscription would be fine if that meant free access to their video store, qore and such.
Sexualchocolate's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:26
Sexualchocolate
Phew, thanks Sony. If this "extra" content is worth it I may pay. But keeping the free stuff as is (like the all important online gaming) and ADDING premium content is fine by me.

It's when free content becomes premium content that we have a problem.

Chances are it will never make it all the way out here to the UK anyway and we'll stick to the current free content that we get anyway.
GameGuyPeter's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:27
GameGuyPeter
I'd say it'll be an extension of the Qore program. Early access to demos and betas, some bonus themes, etc.
Chronic Logic's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:27
Chronic Logic
inb4 fanboys, trolls, etc...
bulleteddy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:29
bulleteddy
Whew. Perfect picture for this story. If Sony started charging in the same manner that Microsoft does, it would make me feel completely cheated as a consumer since I just let my XBL subscription lapse since I believe that gaming online should be free. The only thing that I would pay a subscription for would be a program that allows me access to EVERY beta, on day 1. Not Qore junk, I mean, I turn on my PS3 and it tells me I can participate in several betas. If they finally add cross game chat...but they CHARGE for it? Count me out.
Cyber Altair's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:29
Cyber Altair
Meh, it'll probably be something that allows you to download premium and dynamic themes for free among other things. Early access to stuff?
Your Moms Hot Lover's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:30
Your Moms Hot Lover
this just makes sense, fanboy storm or not.
Ganjookie's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:31
Ganjookie
<insert rant 10254.23.14>

I feel I must assert my freedom to comment on an important public issue that SONY has thrust into the vortex of public comment. Here's my side of the story: There is one crucial fact that we must not overlook if we are to perceive our current situation as it is, rather than in the anamorphosis of some "ideology" such as separatism or fogyism. Specifically, there's something I've observed about SONY. Namely, it may not know how to spell "microclimatological", but it unmistakably knows how to bring widespread death and degradation to millions of human beings across the face of the Earth. I've further observed that SONY's eccentricity is surpassed only by its vanity and its vanity is surpassed only by its empty theorizing. (Remember its theory that we should avoid personal responsibility?) Just look at the bill of fare served up in recent movies and television programs and you will hardly be able to deny that some of the facts I'm about to present may seem shocking. This they certainly are. However, SONY's legatees consider its nostrums a breath of fresh air. I, however, find them more like the fetid odor of gnosticism. That's all I have to say about SONY so I guess I'll stop writing now. Oh, and SONY: Before you start formulating a smart reply, don't bother because I'm just not interested.
KINGof210's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:33
KINGof210
Hey, I'm down with it if it doesn't effect online gaming.

That, and keeping free content the way it is while just adding the premium content (I guess Qore qualifies as that) is cool too; basically, what "Sexualchocolate" said.
Nic128's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:34
Nic128
Whatever prenium stuff there is, Canada always gets half of it, try to justify the same price as the US one.
grassr00ts's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:35
grassr00ts
Love the ton of users without avatars popping up for this story. Think this might have to do with having cross game chat? I can see sony adding a premium to that feature.
deadline's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:35
deadline
If they make me pay for Netflix I'm going to be pissed.
TheCleaningGuy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:36
TheCleaningGuy
DON'T charge for demos.
natetehgreat's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:37
natetehgreat
As long as they leave the current free model as is (and by that I mean, that they don't take away features and add them to the premium subscription), I think that's fine.
Sexualchocolate's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:37
Sexualchocolate
@nic128 hehehehe perenium.
Neonie's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:41
Neonie
Does it really matter? Knowing how long it takes Sony to do things, by the time this comes out we'll be on Playstation 5 in 2030
TOEmastro's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:42
TOEmastro
I would imagine cross game chat would involve Sony spending money (Read: extra) and don't want to flip the bill
ZetaOmega's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:47
ZetaOmega
Well, if they just leave the tv shows and gaming DLC purchasing alone then I'm fine with that.

But for Qore, you'd definitely want to pay for a subscription as it's a virtual magazine afterall. Perhaps they'll also add online versions of EGM, Game Informer etc...
ThaJinx's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:53
ThaJinx
I'm with @natethegreat; I have a suspicion that some small and seemingly innocuous features are going to magically become premium, and I'm not going to even know that those features were useful until I have to pay to use them. This is alright as long as everything that currently is free stays free.
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:55
Xzyliac
Part of me really hopes they charge for some real important stuff just so the whiners can get boned.

Yes I am an ass.
jawshoeuh's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 09:55
jawshoeuh
I'm all fine and good if they just ADD premium content for a subscription plan, but if that in any way means they are actually taking away anything that is currently free I will.. I will.. I will punch myself in the balls. Eat that, Sony.
Trev's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:00
Trev
They're doing it right, as far as I'm concerned. I will buy collector's editions of games. I subscribed to Qore for extra stuff. I can play online for free but anything I subscribe to will just be icing? I'm good with this, and that's what "premium content, in addition to current free services" sounds like. It's kind of weird, I know, but I'll pay $100 for God of War 3 with a bunch of other fluff crap that doesn't really improve the game while Capcom asking for $5 for the multiplayer portion of RE5 pissed me off.

Optional purchase: Here's my money.
Required purchase: Fuck you.
Sexualchocolate's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:03
Sexualchocolate
Optional purchase: Here's my money.
Required purchase: Fuck you.

This.

In before deluded 360 fanboys start trying to say that the online portion of games is an "extra" or "optional".
Fiat Mediocrity's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:03
Fiat Mediocrity
I like how the story says that online play will still be free, but everyone is worried about it not being free anymore.

I'll pay for a PSN subscription if I get faster downloads and the ability to "rent" movies and the like from the Playstation Store.
Sexualchocolate's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:13
Sexualchocolate
BRING THE VIDEO STORE TO EUROPE ALREADY!

I'LL FUCKING PAY!
makesfive's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:20
makesfive
Eh I seriously doubt they'll keep their word regarding free online play. PS2 backwards compatibility anyone?

Taking off my cynical hat, really just hoping this is because they're going to add crossgame chat and don't wanna pay for it.
Nic128's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:20
Nic128
@SexualChocolate
Oh right, Prenium with a capital p, my bad. :P
sqlrob's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:26
sqlrob
@SexualChocolate:

I play only single player games. Please explain how multiplayer is not optional.
CelicaCrazed's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:26
CelicaCrazed
Goddammit those msg spammers on PSN were right o_O

It better be worth it at least.
Tha Meat's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:26
Tha Meat
My theory...

Monthly subscriptions for all the videos that you can download in the videostore. Kinda like a netflix, streaming media kinda thing. Instead of buying each episode by itself you pay for a service to be able to watch all you want.
Insanity-Oo's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:29
Insanity-Oo
@sqlrob:

Optional for you is not optional for everyone.
Elsa's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:40
Elsa
they heavily advertise free online play... I don't think they could remove it at this point - not without a ton of lawsuits anyway...
akathatoneguy's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:40
akathatoneguy
This news comes just in time for Fanboy Friday!
GiftofGab's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:41
GiftofGab
I agree with everyone else but...

They couldn't possibly charge for cross game chat...right? right?

Here's hoping the use the money to improve PSN, anyway. I'd like things to be as quick as they are on XBL. I'd probably be willing to opt in depending on what they're giving us. I'm actually one of the few who likes Qore, so this would probably be for me as well.
ikiryou's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:42
ikiryou
@Xzyliac

HM. You might just get your wish. Sony IS managed by idiots, after all.
TheStripe's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:49
TheStripe
@Gift - PSN is currently a money pit. Sony has been charging Content providers a per data donwloaded amount to put free and premium content on PSN. XBL generates money for it's own upkeep.

How is it so hard to see why PSN os an inferior service to Sony, cp's, and consumers? Hopefully a paid model
for shit like netflix, demos, and Home will at least lighten the load on the Sony servers as well as provide funds for expansion so PSN stops sucking hind tit.
Sexualchocolate's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:51
Sexualchocolate
@sqlrob:

Optional for you is not optional for everyone.

This.

Also, just because you are stuck in the 90's playing against the AI, doesn't mean the rest of the gaming world isn't bored of that already.

I treat games like a digital sport. PvP, competitive. Not like a story book that guides you through with the odd challenge of your button pressing skills here and there.

I am the opposite gamer to you, I rarely bother with single player, I'm bored of AI, I want real enemies, real opponents and a real challenge.

So yeah, to MOST of us it's not optional. In fact it's the best bit of most games IMO, you sir are missing out bigtime.
whormongr's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 10:56
whormongr
it could be worth it if the fee is small and you get free access to the video catalog- also maybe ps2 titles? remember that leak a while back?
Black Nexus's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 11:03
Black Nexus
As long as online stays free I couldn't care less about the rest.
sprldr's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 11:09
sprldr
What exactly will this "Premium" service be? I don't see anything significant missing from PSN.
mrandydixon's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 11:11
mrandydixon
Of course they are. I just got a PS3 on Saturday.

Oh well. I'm sure whatever those "premium" services are, I won't be using them. Just like I don't use them on my 360.
RenagadePanda's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 11:15
RenagadePanda
What could they possibly offer that I would want to pay for?
sqlrob's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 11:18
sqlrob
@SexualChocolate:

I'm missing out on the cheaters, the racists, the homophobes, scheduling around other people's schedules. Yeah, huge loss there, I'm heartbroken.
Ninja Cameraman's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 11:22
Ninja Cameraman
FUCK YEAH. Now sony'll HAVE to do shit like Cross Game Chat if they are actually competing with XBL instead of using the lame "We're free so we'll take our time" excuse. I cannot wait to pay for a PSN the reaches the bar XBL set if they trot out universal music and CGC.

It's pathetic the console with the computing power of a can of Tab can has Parties and universal music and the console helping cure cancer pulls of Facebook and photo albums
Carlton Banks's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 11:24
Carlton Banks
It's a subscription based service named simply, Sony Online Service. Got an Ericson phone? It connects. PSP? Same. PS3? Yup. Ebook readers, Viaos, etc, will as well. Seeing all the jumping of the gun, is fucking hilarious.
Sexualchocolate's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 11:42
Sexualchocolate
@sqlrob - You clearly don't play online much my friend, or at least haven't since the early 90's.

cheaters - PC is where that's at. Save a few old COD map issues, (and they were seriously irritating) it's not a problem. At all.

Racists and Homophobes - This is about PSN, not LIVE. You'll find a higher caliber of people on PSN, possibly down to the kiddies and uneducated scumbags not being able to afford the console. Plus, there is that ever useful MUTE button.

Scheduling? - uh, what? There are always people online, always people to play with, millions in fact. Now and then it pop's up that one of your friends are online and in MW2 at least, you can drop straight into their game.

I've never had to schedule to play online. Any time of the day there are plenty enough people to play with. You get invites, and the OPTION to join / ignore them.

You seem scared of playing online? It doesn't bite! Some mean words can be removed in the blink of an eye with the mute button and you can even get your own back by capping the racist / homophobe and knowing that they're on the other end, going "Oh for fuck's sake!" - Causing real people the annoyance of killing them is what it's all about. Everytime you die, it makes the sweetness of that next kill grow.

Try it, you might like it. It certainly beats the living shit out of going through a developers story, not interacting with anyone real, listening to scripted events and that little bit of satisfaction from doing what they intended you to do all along.

I'd prefer to be given a set of rules and boundaries and to do it MY way, and to know that everyone I shoot is thinking "fuck! He shot me!"
Midgetsnowman's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 12:06
Midgetsnowman
@sexualchocolate: Its people like you who convince companies DLC is a great thing to make.
Sexualchocolate's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 12:29
Sexualchocolate
@ midget - dlc? Since when does this have anything to do with dlc?

I prefer online gaming, how does that have anything to do with dlc?

I'm not a big dlc er i play games till i'm bored of them and tend to trade them in by the time dlc arrives.

I don't see your point....
Shadowiii's Avatar - Comment posted on 11/19/2009 13:18
Shadowiii
So the PS3 fans troll the Xbox Facebook threads with "LOL UR PAYING FOR FACEBOOK HA HA," when now the PS is clearly doing the same with all its new features for online?
You can claim all you want, but you KNOW that is what is going to happen. Everything new (watch, cross game chat) is going to be part of the "premium" feature. It's going to turn into what Live Gold is: Everybody is going to get it because it's practically required. Yeah, I could use Silver, but the benefits of having Gold outweigh the price.
Watching PS3 Fanboys flip flop like crazy, with their one reply after another in these threads, is completely hilarious. Sony is doing the exact same thing MS is doing, don't keep kidding yourself.
But hey, it's paying $50 a year to SONY but not MICROSOFT for the exact same online gaming experience, so it must be A-OK.
Seriously, start listening to yourselves. This is ridiculous. Actually, keep going, I haven't had a laugh this good in months.
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 

   Got news?   tips@destructoid.com   |   Dtoid Twitter

New Videos

more videos


Reviews & Previews
BioShock 2 review
Dante's Inferno review
Chime review
Hustle Kings review
iPhone Review Round-up: January review
more reviews
Dawn of War II Chaos Rising
Metro 2033
A trip to the racetracks Days of Thunder Arcade
Double the pleasure, double the fun with Darwinia+
Wizarding world in plastic Lego Harry Potter Years 1-4
more previews


- The Dtoid Army is 56752 strong -

Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

Call for entries: the Areas of my Expertise

New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide


 Originals
Jim Sterling: How Aliens are blatantly better than Predators





















More Destructoid Originals




We are Destructoid   tips@destructoid.com
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Niero
Founder, Big Boss
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Dale North
News Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Destructoid Video EIC
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Brad Nicholson
Managing Editor
Tom Fronczak Colette Bennett
Ashley Davis Ben Perlee
Conrad
Zimmerman
Chad Concelmo
Jonathan Holmes Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Will Maddock Matthew Razak
Josh Tolentino
Joseph Leray
Topher Cantler Samit Sarkar
     
  Adam Dork
Daniel Lingen
Hollie Bennett
Joe Burling
Mikey Turvey






 
 
  get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
contribute a news tip
suggest a feature
be a guest editor
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meetup+play online
seriously

about Destructoid
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator
Despingation?




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006