Quantcast


Preview: Call of Duty: Black Ops photo

“I can objectively say that it’s the best game Treyarch’s ever made, period,” claimed Josh Olin, the studio’s community manager, referring to Call of Duty: Black Ops at a recent Activision press event in New York. This was after he showed live gameplay demos of two missions from the campaign of the upcoming Cold War-era first-person shooter, and although I really enjoyed 2004’s Spider-Man 2, I’m inclined to believe him.

In the wake of the veritable dissolution of Infinity Ward -- the developer behind the phenomenally successful Modern Warfare games -- Treyarch is in a unique position, poised to usurp the throne of ‘marquee Call of Duty developer.’ From what I’ve seen of Black Ops, they’re well on their way.

1

Call of Duty: Black Ops (PlayStation 3, Xbox 360 [previewed], PC, Wii, DS)
Developer: Treyarch (PS3, 360, PC, Wii) / n-Space (DS)
Publisher: Activision
To be released: November 9, 2010


The demo started with a mission called “Victor Charlie,” in which you’re part of an elite group of soldiers investigating potential Soviet involvement in the area of Vietnam’s Huong River. Not wanting to give away too much about the story, he wouldn’t specify a time frame. The mission opened with muffled cries of alarm, and the player’s blurred vision slowly focused on the cockpit of a downed helicopter inside which the water level was rapidly rising. As if that weren’t bad enough, gunfire shattered the windshield, and within moments, the vehicle plunged into the river.

Playing as a character named Mason, Olin wrenched open a door and swam out while more bullets pierced the surface of the water. He made his way to a boat, where he surprised a Vietnamese soldier from behind, taking control of his gun and drawing fire to his newly acquired human shield. Then he took careful aim at the head of the last standing enemy and fired, and the first-person camera switched to a cinematic angle that followed the bullet in slow motion as it entered Victor Charlie’s forehead. The moment stood out to me, and not necessarily in a good way -- it certainly looked cool, but it was a stark contrast to the tone of the rest of what I saw.

2

Modern Warfare 2 was certainly a serious game, but it entertained players with bombastic spectacle. Black Ops generally doesn’t celebrate war; instead, since you play as the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam - Studies and Observations Group -- a US special operations unit -- it presents a more brutal, improvisational, accomplish-your-objectives-by-the-seat-of-your-pants picture of the Vietnam conflict. Don’t get me wrong -- this is a Call of Duty game, and when Olin rained down rockets from a helicopter, the blistering explosions reminded me of Apocalypse Now and its gung-ho Lt. Col. Kilgore. But the significant stealth aspect of Black Ops means that much of the combat is more up close and personal, and there’s simply nothing pretty or glorious about the vicious, anything-goes guerrilla tactics that you and your enemies use against each other.

After the cinematic kill, Olin skipped ahead to avoid spoiling the story, and came to a sequence where his AI leader handed him some Semtex -- a brand-new plastic explosive in 1964 -- to plant on the foundations of a hut, so the group would have a distraction before an assault on a village. Mason set the explosive and then climbed into a hut, where he stabbed a sleeping Vietnamese soldier and slit the throat of another guard. Next, he rejoined his teammates outside the village. They detonated the Semtex, and then engaged the Vietcong in the area. Upon clearing the village, they headed toward a dock where an anti-air gun sat in a reinforced setup. Using a grenade launcher, Mason made quick work of the gun and everything around it.

The next segment of the mission exemplified the gritty, brutish nature of the Vietnam War. Mason’s squad came upon a tunnel whose entrance was covered by some forest undergrowth. Once they tossed in a grenade to clear out the Vietcong inside, Mason and a teammate climbed down into the tunnel. (Treyarch showed this part of the mission at Microsoft’s E3 press conference.) They crawled past the maimed corpses of the men they had just blown up, while rats scurried past them. Water seeped in from the sides and dripped from the ceiling of the dank tunnel, as Mason shined a flashlight for his buddy ahead of him. Just as the soldier turned a corner, a Vietcong soldier stabbed him before Mason could do a thing; after killing the enemy, Mason had to simply forge ahead past the lifeless body of his squadmate.

3

At a fork, someone jumped into the tunnel; a shocked Mason almost fired on instinct before realizing it was Reznov, a comrade whom you will recognize from the studio’s previous Call of Duty game, 2008’s World at War. “Reznov! You nearly took a bullet,” exclaimed Mason -- yes, the playable characters actually speak in this game. A few moments later, Reznov wrestled savagely with an enemy in a puddle before stabbing him; I thought to myself, “This Reznov guy is a bad dude.” He then told Mason to go forward, saying that he would flank the enemy. Further ahead, the tunnel opened into a pitch-black room; as soon as Mason and his flashlight beam turned the corner, bullets streamed toward him from the darkness. He returned fire, downing a few, before Reznov took out the others from a side tunnel.

Treyarch is promising an “incredible narrative” in Black Ops. Olin acknowledged that the tale told by World at War was rather simple -- “good guys, bad guys, try to beat the [...] Imperial Japanese Army” -- but asserted that this game has a “much more complicated and deep story.” He explained the setting by pointing out that the covert group you play as in Black Ops isn’t fighting the war itself; that’s a job for the common soldiers. “You’re actually on a specific mission [...] that furthers our fictional plot,” said Olin, saying that Treyarch is “weaving [the narrative] through reference points in time.”

One of the ways in which they’re improving their storytelling is through full performance capture, a technique in which a motion-capture actor’s face is tracked along with his body. It allows Treyarch to bring much more emotion into the game by providing more realistic facial expressions. The second mission that Olin showed me, “Payback,” featured an escape from imprisonment. Mason was joined this time by a soldier named Woods, and in the section I saw, the two came upon a camp with a Hind helicopter. Woods turned to Mason and declared, “You see that Hind? I’m gonna take it!” What struck me wasn’t his daring boast. Instead, I noticed that his eyes were narrowed, his brow was furrowed, and he kept looking around nervously; I’d describe his temperament as “crazed.” Perhaps his time in captivity made him that way.

4

Black Ops looks to be another high-octane blockbuster entry in the Call of Duty franchise, but its dark undertones suggest to me a somber gravity that I didn’t find in the Modern Warfare games. If Treyarch keeps up that tone throughout the whole story, this might be the most mature Call of Duty game yet.








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Samit Sarkar is a founding Destructoid editor and go-to Sports guy. Samit was the son of the Duke of Knees, rescued from a burning village in the afghan desert by a golden condor. He is an ace Backgammon player and lost both legs in a whaling tour. He lives for free in a nursery in Scotland where he teaches monks how to capture butterflies without hurting them. Likes Confuse Ray, Feel My Blade A Mabari War Hound, Snot, Spiral Arrow, Argo, Dan Smith's critical hit bark, Rolling things up into my life Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

52 comments | showing # 1 to 50
prev
next 50 comments

RoverTHX's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2010 19:02
RoverTHX
Awesome sauce
I Use Valtrex's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2010 19:26
I Use Valtrex
So when does a developer say: "this is probably the second best game we've ever made"?
Telephis's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2010 19:27
Telephis
im waiting on news of subscription based mp
CoruptAI125's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2010 19:31
CoruptAI125
Can't wait. I hated MW2 and always thought of World at War as the best CoD. Treyarch>Infinity ward
Gorescream's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2010 19:33
Gorescream
Me too Telephis



....























IN BEFORE ACTI SUX NOT BUYING THIS GAME
Koouunn's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2010 19:35
Koouunn
@ Telephis that probably wont happen, and i dont want it to happen but who know whats gonna happen with kotick running things
arbsnotdead's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2010 19:50
arbsnotdead
In b4 treyarch sux, they never made a decent game ever.

But seriously, world at war, altho buggy, was a decent game. And i certainly finished it 3 times.
Blue Odeyssey's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2010 19:53
Blue Odeyssey
World At War was the best cod and I can't wait for this one, not looking forward to it as much as DR2 but on the hype list i'd have to give it a solid 8.
Avalon's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2010 20:15
Avalon
BRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWNNNNNTOOOOOOOOWWWWWNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thane Vickers's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2010 21:34
Thane Vickers
I feel bad. This sounds like Treyarch finally getting their shit together to make a Infinity Ward-esque experience... Sadly ( I don't know if it's only me) I've lost almost all interest in realistic shooters. They just don't do it for me, anymore.
Happy Chainsaw Man's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2010 21:39
Happy Chainsaw Man
I feel pretty safe in saying that I've got a few years of COD-playing left in me. They may not all be day one purchases, but I'll keep playing them.
Kytherno's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2010 21:49
Kytherno
I'm just not liking the idea of basing a war game over a real war. Which is why I loved MW 2 single player so much.
Bill Mueller's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2010 22:11
Bill Mueller
for my money, the single player campaign in world at war, was way better then MW and MW2. I like the seeing the "darker" side of war, it's more realistic. With MW you get the sense that war is all about killing, and explosions with no remorse at all. With WaW it felt more human to me. I appreciate that. looking forward to this game!
flea friend's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/20/2010 23:23
flea friend
“'I can objectively say that it’s the best game Treyarch’s ever made, period,' claimed Josh Olin, the studio’s community manager"

Someone should tell him what "objectively" means.
Volomon's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 02:54
Volomon
@Kytherno If they had to create their own creative scenario half the people from Treyarch would be dead from brain hemorrhaging.
Klarden's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 03:22
Klarden
i'm surprised, to see so many instaces of "treyarch" and "realistic" in the same sentence. IW did "cinematic realism" and more or less historicaly accurate games. Treyarch did not pay attention to either realism or accuracy in WaW and, judging from the screens and videos, Black Ops will be the same. It doesn't make either games bad. Just stop caling them "realistic"
Infernoman's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 06:29
Infernoman
@Klarden games have to take some liberties with what they can have a real. Black Ops as was said is weaved through the cold war so a lot of what you will see isn't standard stuff because they're special ops...many times they'll gain weapons that were prototypes years before they became official.

What wasn't realistic about WaW over CoD4 or CoD6 (MW2)?...besides MP. for BO you won't know until you play how the single player goes.
Rogue257's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 07:40
Rogue257
@Kytherno What else are they gonna base it on? The war in the Alien vs Predator films? It's better when it's a real war because then you sit through the action! Yes, it wasn't action for the ones involved in it, but this game isn't aimed at them, is it? (the ones who are still alive, anyway) It sucks to be us, eh? We couldn't have seen what all the horrors in that war were... well, that's not our problem! If anything, it's Activision's gain cause we sick people have killed BARE Nazis in many WW2 games, now it's time to move on the slaughtering people in the Cold War... VIETNAM STYLE!!!! :P

Now, if someone could just make a game based on the war in Iraq, or Afghanistan, or WHEREVER the hell that "war thing" going on at the moment is set. Because let's face it, whether it's now or in 60 bloody years or something, one WILL be made...
emoslayerbty's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 09:01
emoslayerbty
@rouge257, medal of honor is set in the iraq war I believe. Fightin the taliban and playing as them as well. As for black ops, this is the first time I've been excited for a treyarch game. Wasn't a fan of waw. WW games are played out. It was nice to see a change with mw and mw2 but the glitches and hacks made it suck. Hopefully treyarch smack this one out of the park. Can't wait to see
Klarden's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 10:25
Klarden
The difference is simple. Let's compare CoD 2 and WaW in this way. Let's say, the game based on 9/11 is made by CoD 2 team and WaW team.

IW way of 9/11 will have one protagonist dying while trying to save other survivors in a cinematic and tragic way. The other protagonist, a firefighter, will save the same survivors the first one tried to save and the game will end with a sad yet hopeful tone.

Treyarch game will have one protagonist doing the same while tying heroically fighting countless terrorists who SOMEHOW survived a plane crash. He'll still die while trying t save the others, but captured on camera saying some "wise words" and singing national anthem. And the second protagonist might even save the second building, just because it would be cool.

That's the difference between "cinematic realism" and simly "cinematic" game. I did like WaW, but in a "play a WW2 game where you kill the Hitler" way.
TheDreadHawk's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 11:13
TheDreadHawk
@Klarden

You forgot the bit where IW shoehorns a betrayal plot for no reason, like Bush did it or something and everyone then I has to go on a hunt for him. Then they completely lose sight of the real objective, and everyone gets confused, and you find your old mentor who was presumed dead, for absolutely no reason. Then around the halfway point (when tower two falls) you find out that it was actually another guy who was planning it all along. You get into a high octane chase scene through the streets of New York City (Unnamed in game) to find this guy, and when you finally do, he shoots you. But you somehow pull the bullet out of you The Mask style and shoot it into the guy's eye.

Then a cliff hanger ending.

Just clarifying for you.
Samit Sarkar's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 11:51
Samit Sarkar
*high-fives TheDreadHawk*
Klarden's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 12:30
Klarden
heh, nice one. But it still goes in the way that doesn't actually get in the way of known history facts, right?:)
TheDreadHawk's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 12:58
TheDreadHawk
*returns high five to Samit*

I was originally dismissing this game as being awful, but when I read this my interest slightly piqued. I believe Treyarch deals with darkness and emotion better than Infinity Ward. While Call of Duty 4 was a fantastic game with an interesting storyline, Modern Warfare 2 was just... so bad. It was like Michael Bay got to make a game, and the worst writers from every B-Movie were tasked with writing it.

While Treyarch's writing isn't the best, it certainly isn't bad. I didn't enjoy World at War, but only because it was another World War 2 shooter. What I did like were some of the thematic elements involved, and if Treyarch can deliver that with Black Ops, I might eventually pick it up when it's cheap.

It's also refreshing to see that the team involved is actually, y'know, excited about making their game.
OLD SCHOOL's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 13:42
OLD SCHOOL
"This might be the most mature Call of Duty yet" Really? That's why Treyarch uses a R /C car as a 3 kill streak reward. What a fucking JOKE Treyarch and Black Ops is. The real talent is in the former IW studio now called RESPAWN entertainment. Don't waste your time or money on this crap, buy a REAL COD game such as COD 2, COD4MW OR CODMW2.
Chaz69's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 14:49
Chaz69
^coff fanboy coff
joshers898's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 15:22
joshers898
@Telephis are you stupid lol do u not watch interviews an shit..there not making it subscription based for mp, they've said it mulitple times there not an also said NOR WILL THEY EVER
joshers898's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 15:23
joshers898
@Telephis are you stupid lol do u not watch interviews an shit..there not making it subscription based for mp, they've said it mulitple times there not an also said NOR WILL THEY EVER
Infernoman's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 19:29
Infernoman
OLD SCHOOL - you do know Multiplayer was never canon in any of the games Treyarch or IW made. MP is irrelevant to the SP campaign.
OLD SCHOOL's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 22:46
OLD SCHOOL
@ Infernoman ~All the way back to COD2 (360 game of the year) 4 years ago, MP was the driving force that was, and is, the definitive online experience for 1st person shooters. (Consoles) An overwhelming number of people still play COD franchise online over the long term on MP NOT doing the CAMPAIGN mode over and over again.
Karlen Vardanyan's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/21/2010 23:39
Karlen Vardanyan
look at the first picture on his hand there is 115 element 115 anyone maybe werewolfs instead of dogs
PrivateParts's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/22/2010 07:08
PrivateParts
The only reason I play CoD is for the multiplayer; I find the storylines of ALL mainstream games to be absolutely terrible (although that may be because I read so much.) MW2 has the best multiplayer IMO since MW1 and before that CoD2; Treyarch have never given me anything 'new' on the multiplayer front and have never interested me. Zombies just seemed gimmicky.
OLD SCHOOL's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/22/2010 16:50
OLD SCHOOL
^@Aprivate parts You are 100% correct on all of the points in your comment and are obviously well educated.
wutang4ever's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/23/2010 03:50
wutang4ever
Campaign wise, I think world at war was better than the modern warfare 2 one. The one thing I didn't like was the split screen mode. The screens were cropped too much! Otherwise it was a great game. Sad to hear that the campaign for this game isn't co-op but if theres a separate co-op mode with split screen play, I'll definitely get this game.
Kian Payette's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/23/2010 12:41
Kian Payette
story ect commednt
Jordan Dillon's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/23/2010 13:41
Jordan Dillon
@OLD SCHOOL
You're trolling about a video game, putting it down because of an optional kill streak reward that involves an RC car? I don't think you can judge any form of maturity. And before you question me, I'm just correcting ignorant fanboys like yourself.
OLD SCHOOL's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/24/2010 01:09
OLD SCHOOL
@Jordan dillon you are not actually correcting anything since I am right regarding the crap that TRYHARD puts out. It's not trolling if it's true. You don't know me, call yourself ignorant.
Agent 47's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/24/2010 02:00
Agent 47
i fear for this game waw tried coppying the first mw if black ops tries mw2 i will be sad :( i already see rediculous kill streaks and fuck rediculous camping spots which is why mw2 sucked if this has tons of glitches it has a big mw2 stamped on it for me
Agent 47's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/24/2010 04:12
Agent 47
i dont really know how to do this so i will do it like everyone else if this is how u reply but @Old School all of those games you listed are fantastic except MW2 that was a glitchfilled campinfested rip off of cod 4. Sequals are usually supposed to be better MW2 had nothing except story going good for it
Eric Pie's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/24/2010 13:41
Eric Pie
nice
Monkey News's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/24/2010 18:19
Monkey News
@oldschool
Wow.....tryhard......REAL CLEVER GOBACKTOSCHOOL!!! See what i did there? Anyway your opinion, is exactly that. Stop trying to force your opinions down everyones neck. For me, i always play the single player campaign before the multiplayer. I dont pay £50 for a game just to play online, especially cod games. The multiplayer really hasnt changed radically since the first modern warfare, so im not paying that for a reskinned with ZOMG A NUKKKKEEEEEEE!!!!! multiplayer experience. The really time goes into the story of the single player. Give it some respect and play it.
Wayne T23's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/25/2010 06:29
Wayne T23
looks faboo, You know you another way they could also do to improve the story, Have it last longer than the time it takes to boil a kettle, for the price that these games cost it would be nice to have a FPS that has a bit of single player longevity, Not all of us like to play online with annoying 12 year old kids. There are players out there who still buy games for their offline content as well.
Monkey News's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/25/2010 07:06
Monkey News
What wayne said.
hornetjockey's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/25/2010 11:38
hornetjockey
I'm not going to like Treyarch because Treyarch isn't Infinity Ward and I like Infinity Ward not Treyarch because they suck.
blackop's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/26/2010 14:58
blackop
I think Treyarch is doing a much better job than IW regarding COD.
xAciDxKittiEx's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/28/2010 21:45
xAciDxKittiEx
This is going to be badass!

www.tekknologic.com
rexB's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/29/2010 08:24
rexB
@OLD SHCOOL you idiot! Do you actually even know your COD? and LOL MW2 is the biggest piece of shit since you were born.
GoodlyMike's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/29/2010 13:59
GoodlyMike
I'm glad the Call of Duty series is going back to the older days, sure Modern Warfare was really great but there is something about past wars that make it even better. Great preview Samit.
HOLY TACO's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/29/2010 21:24
HOLY TACO
This looks pretty sweet I've been playing a lot of Modern Warfare again recently, never planeed on getting MW2 but I will get black ops for sure. Most people I know that play MW2 like the look of Black Ops and are probably going to switch over. I won't be buying day 1 though. Will wait to gauge forumites/bloggers reactions. From what I've seen of the multiplayer it looks great.
Anim's Avatar - Comment posted on 08/31/2010 10:43
Anim
meh.........DO WANT!!!!
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!