This sounds amazing and I am glad to hear the bugs have been worked out! They REALLY need a demo because the beta left a lot of people confused and butthurt.
Also, abysmal.
I certainly hope they pay more attention this time around than they did with BC2. There are still so many glitches in that game it isn't even funny. (And for the record, it's one of my favorite games of all time. So I'm allowed to bitch :D)
The gameplay of the beta was glitchy, but overall it was fine. What was far more disconcerting was that the overall infrastructure of the game was awful. People couldn't group up with friends and launch into a game... the 4 person group broke up and people were assigned to different teams and squads. Voice chat on the PS3 was badly broken... sometimes working, sometimes not. There is still only the ability to group up with 3 other friends, so clans and gaming groups are concerned with how the server browser will work. Dice hasn't released ANY information on this (last I checked). Will there be the abiliity to set up larger games so clan members can all play on the same team (or at least in the same game)?
This is all well and fine for a preview... but I'll wait on a review and hope that unlike past reviews (homefront) there will be some mention as to how the basic infrastucture is working.
A game can be fantastic... but if I can't play with friends or use voice chat reliably (or if the game has terrible matchmaking creating 30 minute wait times)... then all the fantastic graphics or gameplay will simply go to waste - because a lot of people simply won't play the game.
I think these guys live for the butthurtings. I just hope the beta left them so jaded they never return to my game.
Also, abysmal
Pertaining to, or resembling an abyss; bottomless; unending; profound; fathomless; immeasurable.
As far as I know, the squad limit is still four. Which means that's probably the most you can expect to party up with at any given time :(
Can't wait for the full game still. If the multiplayer is on the same level as BC2 I'll be more than pleased.
Unfortunately they won't give further information on their server browser which could end up being a gimped version that simply lists games already created in the matchmaking system... or some other such silly use of a server browser.
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/10/06/246-dfj-246-dfj.aspx
@ Elsa: You might want to take a look at this.
http://www.reddit.com/r/battlefield3/comments/l9h7c/i_have_a_mission_just_for_you_rbf3_diceea_wants/
I'm really excited for this though, got it pre-ordered on Amazon for $41.99. Yeeeee!
people on the internet oh you make me laugh
I also already saw their list of fixes and it concerns me that squad splitting for team balance will still happen. Surely they could keep squads together and simply wait on a game that allows the squad to stay together?
It just seems that the infrastructure and basics of getting into a game with friends should have been done long, long ago. It should have been rock solid and for a team based game, this should have been included in the beta.
It seems that a lot of this very basic stuff is being worked on at the last minute.
I'm still interested in the game... but I'll wait till after launch to ensure it's not a buggy mess as so many recent game launches have been. :(
Please, please please tell me you are joking. PLEASE! IT'S A BETA!!! The definition of a Beta is "it's not finished". How is this hard for people to understand?
"One of the longstanding complaints of the series has been the limitation on 4 person squads..."
Actually, that's only been a complaint of the console games, which aren't true-Battlefield games, which have now heavily influenced the true-BF game. Much like how there was no such thing as a story in the first two Battlefield games and we liked it that way, now, thanks to the 'Bad Company' audience, there is a tacked-on campaign in Battlefield 3. This really is Homefront all over again.
I for one am ecstatic at the idea of finally getting my hands on BF3. The beta was in poor shape, but the brilliance shone through and any complaints I had about it were already addressed in the current version. Blame Sony for the version you got to play, Elsa, not DICE.
Basically, imagine what Homefront was aiming(and failed) to become(stellar multiplayer experience, tacked-on singleplayer for the people who don't know that competitive FPS' are not story-focused) and BF3 will deliver more than that. I guarantee it.
It was hard to tell, as we switched maps and modes so much that I couldn't cohesively get a peg on whether the network infrastructure is improved. I totally know what you mean though - I spent an hour in the beta with my twin brother trying to figure out how the f**k we were supposed to #1. Get in the same actual squad during gameplay and #2. Communicate with each other while in the same squad (on the oft chance we managed to actually squad up.)
During the preview event, I was able to communicate with the guy I had earlier played co-op with, he was connected to my network for the whole time - even when he was on the opposing team. That connection was pretty clear, though we were sitting pretty near each other anyhow. The voice communication seemed okay as far as that goes - at one point someone on my actual squad was talking and we could hear each other fine.
I too hope that this has been totally fixed, and this inability to just squad up and join a game as your squad (with full communication) like in BC 2 is not some arbitrary thing they're imposing to mix up gameplay or something. It was irritating especially when I could hear other players without being able to mute them and some jackass thought it would be cool to blast shitty music that everyone else had to hear. Made me have flashbacks from another FPS game that I won't mention to stoke any fires...
However, the beta is really nothing to go by for any of what it was trying to sell or how it played...after playing a more final build I'm left wondering why they thought it was a good idea to release an incredibly buggy beta map that was very limited in scope, especially considering most gamers don't seem to understand the idea of a beta. Yes, we all have been duped into being the playtesters for a particularly painful build of the game.
I'm wet for this game, so fucking wet.
Recently cancelled my eggsbawks pre-order and re-pre-ordered on PS3, off of the back of the beta - just felt better on PS3 I reckon, and my PS3 is downstairs, my eggsbawks is upstairs.
Screw PC version - I hate KB/M and it looked and ran like shit on my £1000+ PC.
Big, open battlefields are what they do best, so why try and crib COD's linear single player instead of including a campaign that actually plays to their strengths?
The multiplayer will no doubt be awesome, but the knowledge that the campaign will be a forgetable snorefest is a bit of a downer.
"I hate stupid people saying that mixing assault and medic is something new: do u ever saw"
I dont think anything more need be said about that comment.
*Logic fails*
hurp derp PS3 VERSION REVIEWED
The review will most likely be a PC review and possibly have a separate console review as well. I chose to preview the console versions because that's what I've historically played, since I haven't been a PC gamer since the 90's.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow




































follow











