That's ok, Arma III using a whole new game engine is on the horizon. Day Z will be using said new engine if the rumours are true.
I seriously doubt it but I wonder if the consoles will ever see DayZ?
Arma 2 is a fantastic shooter in its own right, don't be so ignorant.
And I don't really trust this dude, he comes off as kind of an asshole, the game is still tremendously buggy and sometimes he bans people onsight for no real reason. Let's hope he acts a little different now.
It'll have raised the profile of Arma III too, which is on the horizon.
Either way, Bohemia wins.
Oh. Fucking. Dear.
The engine is one of the most advanced around, it's been built for mil-sim type games.
There's really nothing wrong with it at all, that you don't like the gameplay is just indicative of your tastes and not the game's pedigree.
Stick to Left 4 Dead if you want a more arcade experience?
Also, it's not mentioned here, but it's being developed by Bohemia with the mod creator leading it, so they'll still win even after it comes out.
Oh yea, twitching like J. Fox and getting stuck inside buildings sure does show off how advanced it is. That advanced AI that runs at the speed of light in all direction also shows how it's one of the most advanced engines around.
Great assumption you have there too. Just because I think the underlying gameplay of ARMA2 is flawed and quite frankly broken in many respects doesn't mean I like games like Left 4 Dead.
Military Sim games aren't exactly a huge market, so saying it's one of the best isn't saying much at all.
Please make it on a new engine, one that's actually optimized, and doesn't make the zombie melees look so...weird.
For me personally, DayZ is still just a buggy mod that has frustrated more than not, despite the limited amount of fun I've had with it. It has a long way to go me thinks to suddenly become a standalone game and I'm not really up for the whole Minecraft development model.
@Kyosuke, yes, this as well.
P.S: Call me a carebear, but I never bought Arma 2 to play DayZ(before DayZ was real), and also, if I wanted to spend 7 hours playing a slow FPS game with realistic zombie fallout and a life system, I would play Fallout or S.T.A.L.K.E.R. [Just giving love to all of you DayZ trolls who will definitely pop up]
Glad you've seen the error of your ways.
@EAPidgeon, yeah man. I loved the massively multiplayer aspects of Fallout and STALKER so much! They're like totally alike! OMG!
Feel even worse for them knowing they bought a shit game for a shit mod.
I can see what they had hoped to accomplish with Daisy though, and if the standalone game functions more reliably than it does using the ARMA 2 engine, I'll give it a look for sure.
I love the concept for this, but the amount of people who have grouped up in small militias, gotten all the equipment they could need, and just go around killing everyone they see effectively guarantees I'll never play it. Ever. The game design has effectively killed growth in long run. Not sure how you fix that.
If you're going to make an opinion, do your fucking research. There's tons of communities out there for Arma II that get more out of the game than you could on whatever military shooter/sim you indulge yourself in. I play with a group of people that participate in 100+ player battles, utilizing the squad system as well as the huge terrain that the engine can offer. No other game can duplicate the experience found in these massive battles, and its a shame that you, as well as a few other people here, don't have the patience to experience it as well.

surf dtoid with 






Rising (10+)
People you follow




































follow









