(Jim I am sorry you go through all of this, you deserve that Skyrim review.)
What kind of reviewer does that?
Loads of them. And your not taking me seriously is your business.
@Jim
32BitSin has a valid point. What, because you're honest about not finishing your fucking games it makes you look better, or something? You saying that "loads" of other people review their games without finishing them doesn't make it right.
Pokemon Rumble was kinda rubbish, and this game is also rubbish. It should have stayed digital.
The Pokemon Company (who controls Pokemon now, not Nintendo themselves) are a bunch of idiots. Ruining Pokemons good name with this half assed drivel, every game they've made outside of the main series is failure.
New Pokemon Snap or GTFO. I remember back with Pokemon spinoffs were amazing.
If I do enjoy a game, it's my personal policy to finish it before reviewing, but every reviewer is different. If you don't like it, there will be 30 other reviews on Metacritic in a few days.
I'm sorry, but have you seen the number of fucking video games that comes out in a month, let alone the fall season? If you're volunteering to play to completion every single one of those games and write a detailed review about them, then by all means do so. Then you can earn the right to call everyone else lazy.
You can take him seriously because well hell, look at the game. Obvious shovelware. People of all ages play pokemon games, but only little kids would bother with this and most other spin offs (Only an inconsiderable percentage of uber fans with lots of time and money would otherwise bother).
Seriously, how can I take a person seriously that doesn't understand that playing that game for however long he did was enough. Not like Pikachu dies at the end and says rosebud or something.
Many reviewers don't finish the games they review not because of irresponsible apathy, but because they either don't have enough time or have enough information on the game that it would a waste of time to finish the game. Plus even if the game had an incredible ending, another thing I keep hearing people bitch about are opinions being strewn into reviews so..Do you really think the score would be any different?
I've been watching you comment on multiple Jim posts lately and all I have to say is bravo at consistently calling Jim out on his bull shit!
They should've thought of putting more time and money into a real main series installment instead.
Anyways, good review.
And what magical mystery GOTY mechanic do you think is hidden in the last 10 minutes of the game? If I spend 10 hours playing a meh game, and the last hour is good, that doesn't magically make it a good game. If anything, that further proves how bad the game is by having inconsistent mechanics and a terrible plot/game flow. Yes, it would be lovely to live in a world where people had enough time to play every single game to full completion before weighing judgement, but you wont find that world here. If you spend half the game having a terrible time and not enjoying it at all, the chances of you seeing the game through to the end are incredibly slim, and the same can be said of many consumers who are looking to buy games.
What fantasy world do you live in? Maybe I should make an interactive game where you use the stylus to scrape a nail on a chalkboard for 5 1/2 hours. I can expect you to play it fully because doing otherwise would be lazy and not courteous, right? You never know, in a later level you might be able to use a hammer to bang on it instead.
This industry is an industry of business. We as consumers are trying to buy products for our entertainment, and (most) developers and publishers are looking to create something to entertain us, thus making us provide them with profit in return. It is no different from someone passing on a game based on a released demo of the game: if you aren't going to be interested in the mechanics for the first part of the game, why should you expect them to magically get better the next half?
A stick of shit doesn't taste any sweeter on the last bite, mate.
By that logic a reviewer would have to 100% complete every game they ever played. You could say a review of Crackdown 2 wasn't valid due to the fact that the reviewer decided against collecting all Billion hidden orbs and whatnot. If the game was not even interesting enough for Jim to finish it that really does say a lot about the game, especially considering Jim's love of Pokemon.
This does seem like a horrible spin-off to Pokemon though, I'll just throw in on the tip with Pokepark and Dask and Trozei.
Unfortunately quite a few hardcore 'Pokeies' have taken a liking to this sub series.
Good luck reviewing any MMO, I guess every review of WoW and FFXIV is invalid. Hey that means FFXIV wasn't a humongous turd on release! LOGIC
Yes, in fact, I have seen the amount of games that come out in the Fall season! It's ridiculous! Last time I checked, though, Jim isn't the only one playing and reviewing games around here. I'd just like reviewers to actually FINISH THE GAMES THEY'RE REVIEWING. If you don't finish it, why bother posting a fucking score? I've seen a few sites, including this one, refraining from scoring a game they didn't finish.
You saying that there's "too many games" coming out to play to completion is a ridiculous excuse. THIS IS WHAT THEY DO FOR A LIVING. I'm sorry, did I miss the part where professional reviewers stopped completing games?
Dale - Demon's Souls.
But that's because Demon's Souls was one of the biggest action games ever made. Dale didn't make it very far in a game that literally offers around 80+ hours of unique content. This is more akin to a mini-game: Jim got the gist.
Also, Dale isn't Jim: it's up to the reviewer to make that call.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow





















follow
