http://sirtobbii.deviantart.com/favourites/48941164#/d4vwifx
http://www.destructoid.com/blogs/Sir+Tobbii/the-posters-of-podtoid-225638.phtml
Shame on you Internet for your figuratively puppy kicking.
Congrats on another great episode chaps. Jim, you were saying last week and you've said before how you don't get why people care and look forward to Podtoid so much. You and Jonathan are either too modest or don't know how great you are! This really is my highlight of the week, and you may be surprised to know that that's coming from a sane man with a busy life.
You get me through some tough gym sessions and its way too hard sometimes not to burst out laughing with many people around.
I'm very much looking forward to Podtoid 200, regardless of whether any plans fall through or not.
@ Brendan Wallach- I think I went over that in the podcast, and now that Penny Arcade and I are no longer on hostile terms, I'd hate to dig that up again.
I'll just say that I totally understand where the PA guys are coming from, and they run their show in a way that expresses their vision of what a videogame convention/celebration should be. If I were in their shoes, I would do things differently, but not because I think their way is "wrong". I just have different vision than they do, because I am a different person.
Hope that makes sense.
So Duke Nukem's stealth booth babes didn't really amuse people, but things Suda is responsible for still do. So Suda's babes are more accepted by the current gaming community. Of course what's popular is always changing.
It's the same thing with Keith Apicary disrupting panels with the naked dancing. If that routine was funny to the majority of people, rather than annoying, I think he'd be getting away with it. It's like how stand up comics can talk about socially offensive stuff and not lose their job, but politicians can't.
Of course for the organizers of these big social events, they can't just base everything they do on what people like. They have to think about setting standards at some level above complete anarchy, and below E3. Because if there is a more serious social incident at the convention, and they are seen as irresponsible, that is their $$$ and reputation on the line, right? I think they made the right call on both of these, they're not responsible for rewriting arbitrary human modesty standards. Sounds like they got a bit fight or flight mode about the mild criticism, though, which is too bad.
Each year PAX seemingly becomes less about the fans and more about the PA core being total fucking hypocrites.
^ THIS
The point is that Jessica clearly didn't have a problem with appearing as she did, objectifying though it may be. If she was fine with it, what right does ANYONE else, male or female, have to complain?
All of this gender controversy is garbage as far as I'm concerned. We're all people, we're individuals, and we should all just behave how we want and not get offended by every little thing that doesn't mesh with our ideology. If we keep acting like men and women need to maintain some sort of forced etiquette between them, we're just perpetuating the "othering" each feels in the other's presence.
Anyways, good ep. The PAX stuff seemed to drag on a tad, but I do feel it was still an interesting discussion. And Jim's scheme was fucking hilarious as always.
It's distracting. I don't like it at all, and I do my best to avoid women that dress like that. Does that make me a monster?
And if women should be allowed to show off whatever softcore bodyparts that they want because otherwise it would be intruding upon women's rights, then why can't a man wear assless chaps in public? The right to nudity isn't a basic human right, it's a matter of respect for the general public.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow

















follow