If I'm playing a medieval game I'll never play as the English, cause when I think of medieval England I think of them invading Scotland and that makes me uncomfortable. Even though that was hundreds of years ago and my ancestors weren't even IN Scotland. So I can understand where you're coming from.
Good show for sticking with your morals. Bravo.
I stopped playing bioshock because I didn't want to be there.
I don't think it's ay all unreasonable for Hamaza to not want to play MoH because of what it makes him feel.
Don't be dicks. Appreciate the man's experience, different from yours or not.
Seems kind of insane.
I'm just a white guy who has literally no connection to terrorism and the war, but I understand what you mean when it's too close to home. And it's a shame that they're doing that. I mean, what, are they going to force you to kill Americans or innocents?
Is it campaign or multiplayer? If it's just multiplayer, well, I don't care really, because that's just bullshit either way. But if they are for some crazy reason trying to make me empathize with their war/whatever in campaign, they can fuck off.
In a related subject, I'm just waiting for the game where one side is called the "Hatfields" and the other side is called the "McCoys." To me it stopped mattering who I was and who I was shooting at in multiplayer games a long time ago.
Replace Al-Qeada with the flying monkey's from the Wizard of OZ if it'll keep you blowhards from breaking out the tissues.
Games aren't art, they aren't a statement on the human condition... They're rarely even interesting narrative wise. They're just toys... A hobby. Have fun, and shut the hell up, please.
I think it should be allowed and hopefully EA will taken it somewhat seriously.
In my FPS history, I have killed many a skin color with many a nationality so it is only realistic that we eventually get around to these guys.
If this was set years ago and it was defunct organization we would have no problem with it. But since We since Al-Qaeda is still relevant in the news and modern world today it is a problem.
Then again, we only have ourselves to blame for the rise of these men.
you play as enemy bawww I can't play this garbage... your a two faced hypocrite
Everyone should just pretend that they are the 80's Al Qaeda who were funded by America to fight the Soviets.
It's a game.
The nazis are the nazis, thing of the past. Al-Qaeda is fucked up actual shit. I know that there are neo-nazis but they are not really much of a treat.
Plus, it's not exactly attempting to be socially sensitive. It's meant first and foremost to make millions upon millions of dollars. The whole "games as art" argument kind of goes out the door here. The whole"this is a story that needs to be told" thing is cynical window dressing.
Blah.
EA seems to try and copy everything Modern Warfare 2 did, including the controversy that surrounded the game.
That said, I'll pick up the game... when its used and cheap.
Im Chilean, yes, from that country at the end of Sud-America, spaniards killed most of my ancestors, but I still play Age of Empires as the country Spain. Plus, I think America has done a lot of good things for the world, but also a lot of bad shit to them. I really enjoy seeing the other side of the face, playing as Al-Qaeda, cause most of people think theyre bad dudes whit beards that kill people and they rape women and stuff, but they steorotipe them. On the other side, we got the Marines. We think theyre all good dudes trying to make the world better and theyre cool and this and that. But they also have bad men that kill inocent people just because theyre superior to them. I think my point of vue isnt bad cause since im from a country that doesnt take part in one side or in the other.
Look this game is no different than the other FPS you have played, just pretend you are something else when you play Al'quaeducts.
In the end its teh same 3D models just changed clothes and giving it a different name. So Hamza if we change the name of Al'qadics to something more... idk Russian enemies or German enemies, then it is ok to play?
I think it’s a bit fucked up that you can play as the real terrorists but then I always thought it was a bit fucked up that you could play as the U.S army in dozens of games set in Afghanistan or Iraq, even if they don’t explicitly state that’s what’s going on, we still always know that’s what it’s supposed to be.
You say that the single-player is American forces, so are the terrorists multiplayer characters?
But here's the thing: whatever the name of the terrorist organization is, be it fantasy or real, it's still a terrorist organization, and those are very real. MODERN WARFARE 1 and 2 let you play as a terrorist on multiplayer (and on one controversial mission in single-player, albeit as an undercover agent). It doesn't matter if the terrorists are Al-Qaeda -- they can easily be interpreted as a fictional version of them. In the end of the day, on MODERN WARFARE multiplayer, you can play as a terrorist and kill American soldiers. Not because you hate them or America (well, not in most cases, I imagine), but because it will give you experience points.
As I said, the single-player campaign might have a very good reason to have Al-Qaeda as the enemy, or it might just be an attempt at causing controversy. After all, MEDAL OF HONOR is not a series known for its deep meaningful story, or lately, for its overall quality.
Is this necessary, you ask? No idea. I haven't played the game yet. I think it's too early to declare your support or lack of. Give the single-player a try first, and if it gets too uncomfortable, stop. If in doubt, just don't play the game.
I don't care how many correlations people here want to draw to Nazis or any real war that has been depicted in a video game; this is how I feel about this game. Like Hamza, I don't think anyone who doesn't like this is asking for anyone else to boycott or feel the way we do. I don't think someone withholding a purchase of Medal of Honor for these reasons is offending anyone.
But it's just a game. A game that has content that is too soon, like Medal of Honor, is pushing the boundaries. Using the war in the Middle East as a basis for a video game (especially an FPS) is basically war propaganda, and it's giving their respective companies oodles of money, as it lets gamers who don't want to get into the service (like myself) experience war, and give them the satisfaction of putting a few bullets into the faces of the enemy. It's bad mojo, and EA should backtrack just a smidge (like, rename "Al-Qaeda" to something humorous, like "Shmal-Shaeda"; something that's not obvious).
Shame on destructoid for promoting this article. This is a bias opinion.
I really hope you're kidding, but if you're not....did you even read the article? There's a HUGE difference between something that hits as close to home as this does for him, and something you read or see in history books.
I played the BETA and it simply doesn't bother me. I take a lot of things serious. Hell, I was one of those people who wasn't going to buy inFamous 2 unless Cole was changed back. But this, well, this doesn't even seem like something that anyone should take notice of at all.
Reading your comment physically harmed me.
On the topic at hand, I'm an American and I've been killing Americans as a middle eastern terrorist in Counter Strike for 10 years, I don't think this is really all that different. I don't hate my country or any of that silliness, it's just how it is, I can understand if it offends certain people, just like Brad with MW2, but really this is nothing new.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow






















follow


