Quantcast


Pitchford thinks Borderlands is less dull than Fallout 3  photo

V.A.T.S, maul and repeat. Bethesda did a lot of things right with Fallout 3, but one noticeable dent in the game’s power armor was the shooting mechanic. We’d say it hovered somewhere between serviceable and poor, but Gearbox’s Randy Pitchford would place it in the more boring than Borderlands category.

In a conversation with Official Xbox Magazine, Pitchford said Borderlands was "less boring" than Fallout 3 when talking about Borderlands' action focus and, obviously, offered up a bit of criticism for Fallout 3 in the process.

"I understand why we do those games [like Fallout 3] but I don't know -- do we want that,” Pitchford asked. “I think that game could have been much better if it didn't have a single dialogue tree. Honestly. And if it was more action-orientated, and if the shooting was better,” he said.

Will Borderlands tickle those with a taste for post-apocalyptic shooters? Even if I could answer that, an embargo would prevent me from doing so. Still, the game does look pretty f’ing metal on the outside. I can’t wait until I get my hands on it. How about you?

[via OXM]








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

57 comments | showing # 1 to 50
prev
next 50 comments

Roager's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:05
Roager
I assume that actually was meant to say "more boring" than borderlands. Seeing, as that's the title and general tone.

Just sayin.
stevetothepast's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:06
stevetothepast
I liked Fallout 3, but I am more of a shooter than an rpg player, so I would love if Borderlands took more of an action approach but with a deep storyline.
Cr0ssbow's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:11
Cr0ssbow
Ok so I'm hoping Borderlands will be good, and if it is, I'll pick it up, but I'm not sure how you can argue that the shooting mechanics in Fallout are bad when at least you can one-shot headshot enemies in that game. Have you SEEN the gameplay videos of Borderlands? You're unleashing entire clips into dudes while they stand there grimacing from the pain...well that kinda sounds dull to me.

Still, I love Pitchford and I love Gearbox, I hope this game can rock my socks.
Steel Brotha's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:12
Steel Brotha
@ Roager
that's exactly what he said.... where did you misunderstand?

But on topic, finally a person other than me who isn't sucking on the Bethesda meat pole. So many reviews gave this a perfect rating rating for being exactly like Oblivion. The shooting suck, VATS was way to depended on, the games' story is boring and nonsensical at times ("I can't go in there, it's your destiny",Fawkes the Mutant immune to radiation), mass amounts of glitches,the DLC was mostly crap,and there was nowhere near as many dialogue options as there were in Oblivion.
Korinthian's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:13
Korinthian
Is this for PC? Because if it's not played with a mouse and keyboard, we know it's not really a shooter.
Jimeee's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:16
Jimeee
@ Destructoid staff: Please sort your shit out (http://imgur.com/oEXTg.png)
Steel Brotha's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:19
Steel Brotha
@ Cr0ssbow
The shooting mechanic in Fallout 3 was garbage. I shouldn't have a hard time hitting a Mole Rat with a pistol if I'm good at Killzone 2. And in what video are you seeing full clips being emptied into guys with them still standing? I just watched some gameplay footage and I'm seeing the regular amount drop a guy. Now if your talking full clips for the massive monsters I understand.
Clarke's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:21
Clarke
I hope they serve beer in hell...
Ganjookie's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:26
Ganjookie
Sheesh Jimeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Spam your complaints why don' you. maybe you will get noticed more for sucking ass.


I hope the game does well, I like FO3 for what it was, an Action RPG. I'm sure borderlands will do great as a shooter with RPG elements (i.e. leveling up)
Cr0ssbow's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:28
Cr0ssbow
@Steel Brotha

http://www.giantbomb.com/borderlands-gameplay-mad-criticals/17-1367/

Watch the 10 crits to that dude's face.
Ganjookie's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:28
Ganjookie
@ Steel Brotha

What does being good at one game have to do with being good at another?
lolipantsu's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:31
lolipantsu
Borderlands is looking like everything I wanted Fallout 3 to be. I'd take a Mad Max-esque FPS RPG over boring old Fallout 3 any day.
Insanity-Oo's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:33
Insanity-Oo
These kinds of comments are why fallout 3 should have been an rpg like it's predecessors instead of a fps. And no, adding stats to your shooter doesn't make it an rpg.
Oncomouse's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:36
Oncomouse
For some reason I first read the title as "Pitchfork thinks Borderlands is less dull than Fallout3." All I could think was, "Oh god, those assholes aren't doing games now, are they?"
Neeklus's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:37
Neeklus
The range of baddies in Fallout was it's main weakness. But to be fair, how many people WOULD survive a nuclear holocaust. Not many I'm sure. Yeah, it should have stayed a RPG. The story was weak yes, but the game environment looked the buisness and all the little touches made it something more magical than rudimentry.

I liked Fallout 3. But I'm thinking it shouldn't be used as the "template" to judge Borderlands.
DarkMagic56's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:39
DarkMagic56
“I think that game could have been much better if it didn't have a single dialogue tree. Honestly. And if it was more action-orientated, and if the shooting was better,” So he rather have the game with less choices, dialogue & possibly less story and More about shooting & killing things... seriously its a damn RPG not a FPS like the CoD series
Ganjookie's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:43
Ganjookie
@Neeklus

I agree with your last statement. Judging a game based on another game because it had a post-apocalyptic backdrop is just silly.

The game should be judged on its own strengths and weaknesses. If it was a direct sequel to FO3 I could maybe understand using the comparison.
PantsCommander's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:45
PantsCommander
Borderlands is rapidly approaching Apple status in the sense that while I want the product, I am completely turned off of it by the smug and stupid PR.

Seriously, his complaint boils down to "This sandwich would be awesome if it was pizza."
akathatoneguy's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:48
akathatoneguy
Some of these comments are hilarious. To say Fallout 3 is "the same" as Oblivion is laughable and only shows that either a) you didn't play those games much or b) you don't know what "the same" means. I know exaggeration is a cool way to criticize and all, but come on. Also, those who say Fallout 3 wasn't an RPG need to be aware that games can be a part of more than one genre. A game doesn't have to be a Final Fantasy clone to be an RPG..ie action RPGs, Western RPGs, strategy RPGs, etc.
MUSADTyf's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:49
MUSADTyf
this looks fun but i want to see the new elder scrolls before i buy anything but gears 3 or ODST maybe just maybe ill get DMMM:elements before i see it
ChaosTeaCup's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 08:58
ChaosTeaCup
I loved Fallout 3. Even its faults. I haven't spent that much time in a single-player game for a long, long time. But then the original fallout is one of my all time favourites, and so I thoroughly enjoyed the references, and plus I waited 10 fucking years to get back into that universe, and so maybe I glossed over its errors for sheer love of the material.

I really like the look of Borderlands, and its definitely been on my radar, but I have to say the in-game footage I've seen did slightly disappoint me on account of it looking so damned 'Arcadey' - which is fine if you're not me, but unfortunately I am. *cuts self*
moominsean's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 09:13
moominsean
i tried to make it through fallout 3, couldn't do it. the controls were were shoddy it was almost a joke. plus, i just found it kind of boring. i can understand why people like it, but i hated the shooting aspect.
Cr0ssbow's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 09:18
Cr0ssbow
Boy, all you guys hating on the shooting...too bad that game didn't have weapons and skills for unarmed/melee combat, huh? Oh wait...
Deny Everything's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 09:27
Deny Everything
You guys are focusing so much on the shooting, whereas I'm jumping for joy about his comment on the lack of dialogue trees. He's not really saying anything unobvious either. Just that action oriented games are less dull then turn oriented games, even if you look at JRPGs you see them moving away from the select-what-you-do style into a more execution style.

And shut up with the metal shit. You sound like a retarded 12 year old.
mOnion's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 09:27
mOnion
why would you want to use melee combat? is that really your argument?
Caster Tr0y 357's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 09:30
Caster Tr0y 357
Am I one of the only people who didn't use VATS at all in Fallout 3? The game took waaay to long with it, so i just abandoned it for the traditional style shooting. I played like 99% of the game that way, and i thoroughly enjoyed every moment of it.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 09:30
Chris Carter
" Bethesda did a lot of things right with Fallout 3, but one noticeable dent in the game’s power armor was the shooting mechanic."

I had no idea Bethesda wanted it to be an action RPG.

Oh wait, it wasn't: it was a turn based RPG with optional action, if you turn off VATs.

I'll agree that VATs was boring, but look at KOTOR, or Dragon Age. That's the same type of combat: Bethesda just tried to trick you by giving you the option to shoot freely. That's something I think that should be commended.

Also, Washington DC area + all the history Fallout 3 entails>>>>>>>>>>anything Borderlands has shown me so far.
Br0th3rGr1mm's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 09:31
Br0th3rGr1mm
Fallout 3 used stats to determine your accuracy even in RT fire mode (non-VATS) situations. It basicly let you aim freely, yet determine if you HIT the target like an RPG (percentage based chance based on skills). This could certainly lead to FPS shooter fan being upset that they were unable to hit something they were obviously aiming at (properly). It was Bethesda's choice at a hybrid FPS/RPG weapon system and some didn't like it.

Borderlands appears to be the opposite approach...they took a pure shooter and have added some RPG elements too it. I tend to agree that it will be "less boring" than Fallout 3 during battle, but fall way short (no pun intended) in terms of RPG story (or lack of story choices).

Looks to be a great game, IMO.
matrixdude171's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 09:34
matrixdude171
Meh, they're all broken down to the same thing. It's post-apocalypse, you have to survive, go explore, there's somewhat a story, there's other people too........ go. BORING
DarkMagic56's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 09:44
DarkMagic56
"Borderlands appears to be the opposite approach...they took a pure shooter and have added some RPG elements too it. I tend to agree that it will be "less boring" than Fallout 3 during battle, but fall way short (no pun intended) in terms of RPG story (or lack of story choices)." I agree with this completely. I don't see Borderlands having a great story IMO but I bet the combat will make up for that sorta like Crackdown in a sense.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 09:47
Chris Carter
Br0th3rGr1mm did just an excellent job of explaining the difference between a story driven RPG (Fallout 3), and a full on action FPS with RPG elements (Borderlands).

Not everyone likes RPGs. But if you don't like FPS games, you're a "douche", so we all know how popular Borderlands will be. Or, similarly, Mass Effect's action popularity in comparison to Dragon Age's Baldur old-school turn based approach. SHOOTERS WIN THIS GENERATION, FELLAS!
Sexualchocolate's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 09:58
Sexualchocolate
Fallout 3 was pure nostalgia for me, the old FO games were my favourite games back in the day so despite it being a little rough around the edges, a bit too oblivion-y, and a bit linear, i enjoyed it.

Boring? No way, seems to me anyone who thinks FO3 was boring is not the turn based strategy person, stick to COD and HALO.

The old fallut games were better in my opinion, despite the clear graphical, perspective and gameplay "improvements" / modernisation the older one's had more.... character.

i'll never forget becomming a porn star in Fallout 2, caled, Arnold swollen-member.

Classic.

I might have to dig out the old Fallout's as they'll blatantly run on the laptop.
DarkMagic56's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 10:10
DarkMagic56
"Not everyone likes RPGs. But if you don't like FPS games, you're a "douche", so we all know how popular Borderlands will be. Or, similarly, Mass Effect's action popularity in comparison to Dragon Age's Baldur old-school turn based approach. SHOOTERS WIN THIS GENERATION, FELLAS!" Thats very "opinionated". Not everyone likes every genre, insulting people for what they like ain't right.
JPVerrier's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 10:20
JPVerrier
Is it really necessary to compare it to another game and bash it just to prop up your own product? This type of PR bullshit is so annoying. If you can't let your game speak for itself, then at least contain your hype for it within itself.

I'm looking forward to Borderlands, but when you come across marketing such as this, it makes me think twice about supporting the company.
falinter's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 10:38
falinter
I kind of got the vibe that it was like Fallout3 except without the "turnbased"-ish shooting element and with more stylish graphics.
Memox's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 10:38
Memox
Fallout 3 was good on its own right. Sure the combat might have been repetitive, but the game was overall fun and had a very entertaining story. Borderlands to me seems like a totally different beast, I'm almost sure its story won't be as interesting but I can also bet it will be really f'ing fun. There is no real point in comparing these two very different games; as a wise man once said: STFUAJPG!!!!!!!
HiddenAHB's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 10:55
HiddenAHB
When will people understand that Fallout is a RPG and not a FPS?
DarkMagic56's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 10:58
DarkMagic56
"When will people understand that Fallout is a RPG and not a FPS?"
When people start caring about story more than combat...
peachboy's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 11:03
peachboy
i'll never understand how fallout 3 got so big. regardless of how much better the originals were, i found it to be one big boring mess.
dwolfwood's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 11:11
dwolfwood
The V.A.T.S. combat system was brilliant. period.
Holyetheline's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 11:15
Holyetheline
I loved Fallout 3. No doubt Borderlands will be better in every way, but still...
Grawly's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 11:18
Grawly
I thought Fallout 3 was amazing maybe the best game this generation and the shooting didn't bother me too much, if Borderlands can get it better though and also have a world as compelling to explore then that will be amazing. It still doesn't look half as interesting though.
nic_disassembly's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 11:38
nic_disassembly
Will Borderlands be linear, that's the real question. I love (and continue to love) Fallout 3 because there is so much RANDOMNESS going on and it's NOT linear at all. It's a cheap sales ploy nonetheless ("hey Fallout 3 fans, buy our game, it's better than Fallout 3, but probably not as good as Modern Warfare 2").
lastdual's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 11:43
lastdual
I'm looking forward to Borderlands, but Randy is totally talking out of his ass here. Fallout 3 enjoyed huge sales numbers, so yes, I'd say customers do want things like dialogue trees...

This is my main beef with Borderlands. It's Far Cry 2 with experience points and AI-generated guns. There are probably going to be all of 10 NPCs in the game who do not shoot you on sight. It will be very light on dialogue, towns, and meaningful NPC interactions.

Will I buy Borderlands? Sure, it's a day one purchase for me. Will I enjoy it as much as Fallout 3. Of course not. It's not in the same league.
Yehat's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 11:46
Yehat
Wait wait wait wait. He's arguing that a FALLOUT game would be better WITHOUT a dialogue tree system?

I like the looks of Borderlands, okay but holy crap you do not need to compare it to DIFFERENT games that have DIFFERENT aims.

I mean that's like someone from Bungie going on to say "Deus Ex was a good game but if it was more like Halo 3 with less RPG elements it would've been better." Or a guy from Blizzard going "World in Conflict was okay but if it had base building it would've been better like StarCraft 2!"

I mean really what the hell?!
Mushman's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 11:46
Mushman
I looked over the shooting mechanics in F3 to experience on of the best exapmles of waht a WRPG( or action RPG, if you prefer) can be. The immersion, exploration and sheer enormity of the world was something else. Yes, the shooting in F3 was much to be desired, but it was bearable with V.A.T.S and was a minor issue in a game that offered, so, so, so much in content. If you are a cynical, jaded gamer who criticizes a single, minor issue in a game more than appreciates everything it did right, even if said game won so many GOTY awards amd is loved my millions, you need to sort your gaming life out.


I am looking forward to borderlands,yet this is the wrong way to market it. Never compare your shooting mechanics to a game that sold 4.7 million copies and can only be compared in the loosest of senses, even if it is better. It's just bad PR considering the fact so many people overlook the admittedly bad shooting elements in F3 and enjoy/love it for everything else. If you put the focus on shooting, then it sends out the message to the consumer that there is nothing much else in the game. Obviously other PR will come out, and may very well focus on the RPG elements, but if a dev talks about the shooting more then the game itself, it's not a very good sign.

Either way, I hope Borderlands will be interesting, seeing as I might buy it further down the line.
Mushman's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 11:49
Mushman
@dolfwood

Yeah, it was brilliant, the gore was seriously OTT and felt amazing on my good guy playthrough blasting a evil enemy to pieces.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 11:52
Chris Carter
@DarkMagic56
It was a joke...

I was showing that shooter fans are very close minded, and tend to be mono-gamers (only Halo, COD, etc).
Yehat's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 12:03
Yehat
@Magnalon

The funny thing is much of the previews of Mass Effect 2 stress about improvements to combat and the shooting mechanics but barely much at all to the RPG mechanics other than new party members.

Not that the first Mass Effect didn't heavily focus on combat while segregating it from the RPG parts but still it's something to observe.
Chris Carter's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/07/2009 12:09
Chris Carter
@Yehat
Exactly. Cater to the masses = more monies!!!!
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!