Quantcast


Pay-to-use computing patent smacked down by the Patent Office photo

Remember that pay-per-use computing patent we talked about a couple days ago? There was a fair amount of discussion in the comments over what exactly the tech was going to be used for and who the main audience was intended to be, as the patent itself was extremely vague and kind of all over the place.

That vagueness has cost Microsoft, as the patent has been officially rejected for "fuzzy terminology", and for trying to patent systems that have already been patented. Tough luck Microsoft! Whether they appeal or not remains to be seen, but if they reapply they'll have some pretty major rewriting to do.

If Microsoft redesigns the patent to specifically target corporate and institutional use, then I don't really have an issue with it. The way the patent was previously written though made it seem like they were just aiming to gouge the average consumer; if that's still what they want to do, then I hope this patent stays dead. 

[Via Slashgear]








More gaming stories around the web. Got news? Submit yours to tips@destructoid.com

Jonathan Ross is an Associate Editor in Los Angeles who is obsessed with capybaras. Like, seriously, obsessed. If he's not playing Team Fortress 2 or getting into arguments about why PC gaming is superior, he's either off having a fancy dinner with lots of expensive wine, or sitting on the Destructoid IRC complaining that's he's not off having a fancy dinner. Likes: Chrono Trigger, Street Fighter, Steam, everything Blizzard and Valve have ever made, playing Angry Birds on the toilet. Meet the rest of the team



Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

16 comments | showing # 1 to 16
prev next

Daxelman's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/02/2009 18:41
Daxelman
Someone just yelled "denied" in an obscene manner.
mix's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/02/2009 18:42
mix
Someone just layed the smack down on this biotch, in an obscene matter.
garison's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/02/2009 18:49
garison
Microsoft got turned down, in an obscure manner.
Holyetheline's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/02/2009 18:51
Holyetheline
These comments are popping up in an obscene manner.
Clarke's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/02/2009 19:12
Clarke
I don't see why they have to patent it. That's like owning the copyright to the Virtual Boy.
JiR INC's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/02/2009 19:18
JiR INC
Objection
akathatoneguy's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/02/2009 19:21
akathatoneguy
Yet Worlds can essentially copyright the ability to interact with other players in a virtual environment?
RonBurgandy2010's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/02/2009 19:26
RonBurgandy2010
Thank God.
faultymoose's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/02/2009 19:40
faultymoose
Someone broke the combo like an obscene tumor.
Aaron Mxy Yost's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/02/2009 20:15
Aaron Mxy Yost
Considering some of the ridiculously vague descriptions used by patent trolls over the years, this one must have been pretty bad to get shot down. Or maybe they're being more strict because it's Microsoft.
Loogibot's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/02/2009 20:31
Loogibot
Windows can't nickel and dime you now, for obscene reasons.
ghettobelmontes's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/02/2009 20:44
ghettobelmontes
hey faultymoose:

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Technophile's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/03/2009 05:16
Technophile
I bet it's specifically to gouge the consumer. Pay per view baby.
Wedge's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/03/2009 05:16
Wedge
This post is boring but Aerox told me to comment on it.

So there.
mistic's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/03/2009 05:19
mistic
I bet it's specifically to gouge the consumer. Pay per view baby.

luckily there's enough other alternatives to not have to be forced to use m$-software :-) I really hope they try this, it'll be the final shot in their own foot :-)
moominsean's Avatar - Comment posted on 01/03/2009 10:14
moominsean
i'm sure at this very instant, some no-name comapny is frantically submitting varations on this patent, hoping one will stick so they can sue microsoft in 10 years.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!