I wonder:
"If you're playing Blacklist on Xbox 360, you can use Kinect voice commands to attract enemies."
Does this mean it's going multiplatform this time around?
Conviction however, I rented, played the shit out of, and loved the entire time. One of my prouder 100% Achievement (including the DLC) games.
So naturally I'm totally looking forward to this next game. Especially after reading this.
agree, the controls were not that intuitive, and the mechanics are too clunky IMO.
then again after wasting money on the HD Collection, i guess im not a fan of games trying to be realistic.
there just not that fun.
It is multiplatform.
I think most fans didn't dislike the new approach, it seems the minority are the ones angry about it. I love all the Splinter Cell games (Except Double Agent 360) and as someone who're currently replaying the old ones... They're fun, but they've aged terribly. Streamlining was a good choice to make the game more fun in general, you can only do the slow and clunky gameplay of Splinter Cell 1-4 so many times before it just becomes a chore.
This is why I loved Conviction, because you can still choose to go stealth if you want to, it's just not forced upon you as often as the early ones. Choice is not bad. I'm gonna play Blacklist and continue my trend of trying to not be seen during missions and do it non-lethal. Non-lethal takedowns was the only thing Conviction was missing btw.
Pure stealth or Ghosting - this is where you go in and get out without anybody knowing you where there.
Aggro-Stealth or panther- You kill without tripping an alarm. You are silent, but deadly.
Action or Aggressive- Just as the name implies. Run and gun.
You can upgrade everything to accommodate your playing style. Even if it was action heavy, Conviction was still a solid game. Knowing what I know now makes me more excited about Blacklist than Conviction.
Non-lethal wasn't even an option in Conviction, there was always a point were you had to go out guns blazing. (think Cobin's mansion) at some point the levels just forced it upon you because video games.
I think if you have to call in an airstrike in Splinter Cell you're doing it wrong. :-|, I just really hope they bring back non-lethal route in blacklist.
Thus the atmosphere is what made the games what they were, and the levels always felt organic, like they existed whether you played the games or not. The level in the first game where corporate offices suffer a terrorist attack while Sam is in there, and you have to accomplish your objectives with the added stress of not getting seen, sneaking around as the bad guys destroy computers and start fires - that was always what SC meant to me.
This new direction has lost that feeling. SC was never about killing people. The overheard conversations between guards. The hacked emails that fill the story with personal info on the NPCs. Above all, Sam's gruff outlook and relationship with Lambert. That was the heart and soul of the game.
Now it just seems like another 3rd person action shooter where the bad guys only exist to be killed and the good guy will smash someone's face in without even a hit of remorse.
Fun that may be. Memorable? Hardly ever.
Worried for this game though, sounds like another dumb third person shooter.
No stealth, no Ironsides....how is this still called Splinter Cell?
I'm saying a Splinter Cell game that is ACTUALLY a Splinter Cell game, and an entirely new Splinter Cell. One that's different than Fisher, but still just as interesting to play. We'd need a new support staff as well, because Grim and Lambert were intrinsically connected to Fisher.
A mission where the objective is to assassinate a rogue Sam Fisher would be a fitting end to the character that Ubisoft singlehandedly destroyed.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow


























follow






