Note: iOS 9 + Facebook users w/ trouble scrolling: #super sorry# we hope to fix it asap. In the meantime Chrome Mobile is a reach around
hot  /  reviews  /  videos  /  cblogs  /  qposts

Oh no, sixty dollars for eight hours? Just ... shut up

4:00 PM on 01.31.2011 // Jim Sterling
  @JimSterling

It seems that gamers are getting more and more obsessed with length. I never felt it was important, yet I am now having to make sure I include at least a rough estimate of a game's running time in every review I publish. While not a problem on its own, this fixation on length has brought with it some arbitrary guidelines that I feel are starting to endanger our perspective. 

I'm talking about the, "I'm not spending $60 for eight hours" crowd. Apparently, a game that lasts eight hours is now a failure, and not worth paying full price for, no matter how good it is. This new emphasis on length over quality smacks of middle school essay requirements, where your word count was more crucial than your writing ability.

Not only do I feel that this rising attitude does a disservice to the importance of a game's overall production, I also think it's an incredibly myopic way of looking at things. I am willing to bet that most of you reading this spend a lot more money on a lot less.

Movies, for example. Most brand new Blu-ray films retail at around $29.99, and that's for 120 minutes of entertainment with as much replay value, if not less, than your average single-player videogame. $30 for less than two hours is a far worse deal than $60 for eight. Of course, many of you would balk at paying full price for a BD, but even if we reduced it to $15 for 120 minutes, you'd need to spend $72 in order to match a game, and I know most of you have bought multiple movies at $15 a pop before. 

Even more dramatic would be spending money to see a sports game or a concert. Tickets for live events range from anywhere between $5 to $100 or more, depending on what you're watching. These may last a handful of hours, and unlike a game or a movie, you won't ever be able to experience them again. It's a one-shot deal of a few hours, and you could be spending a lot of cash to get it, excluding your travel and food expenses. 

Oh, and let us not forget prostitutes! How could we? You'll spend at least fifty bucks for what I am certain will be three minutes of entertainment and several hours of guilt, shame and buyer's remorse. Plus, Dead Space 2 won't make your balls itch for a month. 

Whichever way you slice it, videogames offer a pretty good deal at $60 for eight hours. Compared to other forms of entertainment, where you'd need to spend significantly more to match that amount of wasted time, you can't go far wrong. In fact, I'd say the only medium to offer more for less would be books. The only audio/visual medium that could come close would be a television series, which can offer several hours of entertainment at a comparable price. As you'll see in a moment, that argument actually helps me out in an further debate. 

One popular way of standing against the $60 price tag is to take two different games of wildly different length and question why they cost the same. After all, if Dead Space 2 is $60 for eight hours, why does a Final Fantasy game offer over thirty hours for exactly the same amount of money? Of course, if you only care about quantity as opposed to quality, then sure, your argument holds water. Of course, it also means you'll need to play crap like Infinite Undiscovery or Risen, which could indeed last eighty hours, but they'll be eighty hours of total shit. Also, a lot more Nintendo DS games would have to cost $60, because that library is full of long-lasting Japanese RPGs. If things are priced according to their length, we'd not only see a lot of retail games go down, we'd see a huge amount of portable titles go up.  

Then we come back to movies and television shows. If a TV show can offer six to ten hours of entertainment, why should a mere movie cost the same amount to buy? In the world of the length-conscious, all things should be priced according to how long they last, regardless of what they do for us. A pizza would need to cost significantly more than a hand-prepared meal by Gordan Ramsay. If it takes longer to eat, it has to cost more. Are you beginning to see the faulty logic at play here? 

It's not like you can pretend the world was a better place several years ago, either. This is not a new thing. One person told me that we "used" to pay for a 25-hour experiences as the standard, and that games have only gotten shorter. Unfortunately, that's total bullshit. Remember when Genesis and SNES titles cost $50? Many of those games could has about an hour or two of actual content, all told. I will grant you that a lot of them would disingenuously extend their running time through difficulty (most of it lazy kind of "difficult"), but even so, a vast majority of them could be completed in well under eight hours if you were dedicated enough.

You could claim you replayed those older games a lot more, but you have to remember -- you were a child back then. Kids thrive on repetition. If you have children of your own, you'll know that they watch the same movies over and over again, repeat words they've learned ad nauseum, and can spend days on the same videogame, sometimes restarting it halfway through because they reached a bit they don't like and happily replaying it again. It's not fair to compare how you viewed games as a child to how you view games now, as you had a completely different brain back then. Not to mention, your parents usually bought your games for you, so you can't argue you had a sense of value. 

I don't even think we had it much better in the last two generations, either. I think of some of my favorite games -- Silent Hill 2, Devil May Cry, Metal Gear Solid -- and none of them were any longer than some of the best games we have nowadays. We may have had a few more lengthier games back in the PS2 era, but not a significantly huge amount, and most of them were yet more Japanese RPGs. Not exactly variety for your money. 

Don't get me wrong. I don't agree that all games should cost $60. Especially in the case of brand new IP from less established developers, there should be far more competitive prices. There are games that I feel aren't good enough to justify a full price tag, and there are games that really are too short, without being awesome enough to back it up -- Kane & Lynch 2's pathetically insulting four-hour campaign is a fine example. 

For the most part, however, I think judging a game purely on its length is an absolutely pathetic way to determine your purchases. Yeah, Dead Space 2 can be beaten in around eight hours, and yes, the multiplayer isn't good enough to extend the running time beyond that. You know what though? It does more in that eight hours than most 80-hour JRPGs do. The amount of action and terror contained in that game is more than worth the asking price. The game is paced enough that, you'll be more than ready for the game to end when it does. A lengthy game full of padding and fluff to meet your arbitrary time demands is far worse than a game that knows not to outstay its welcome, and works on making its eight hours compelling and rewarding. 

Looking purely at how many hours a videogame lasts is to ignore everything else it might possibly accomplish, and I think it makes you a very sad gamer. Do you not play games to be entertained and amused? To have rich and varied experiences, to enjoy interesting stories and get into awesome situations? Or are you just playing them to waste twenty hours of your life? Are they just things to keep your occupied so that you don't spend all your time masturbating instead? Judging a game based solely on its hour count is just ... depressing. 

Just remember, it's not the size that counts, it's how you use it. 



Jim Sterling, Former Reviews Editor
 Follow Blog + disclosure JimSterling Tips
Destructoid reviews editor, responsible for running and maintaining the cutting edge videogame critique that people ignore because all they want to see are the scores at the end. Also a regular f... more   |   staff directory



 Setup email comments

Unsavory comments? Please report harassment, spam, and hate speech to our community fisters, and flag the user (we will ban users dishing bad karma). Can't see comments? Apps like Avast or browser extensions can cause it. You can fix it by adding *.disqus.com to your whitelists.

 Quickposts
Status updates from C-bloggers

StriderHoang avatarStriderHoang
The first person I block is the person who talks shit about Platinum
Torchman avatarTorchman
Even though your waifus are shit
Darth Wachen avatarDarth Wachen
Finally, a blog that I can call my own, I feel accomplished somehow.
Nekrosys avatarNekrosys
Gonna be honest; this really made my day.
Rico the Penguin avatarRico the Penguin
I doubt I'll use it much but I'm totally fine with a block/ignore feature. Everyone has a right to speak, but I don't think anyone has a right to be heard. If this place played country music I'd want a mute button, basically :p.
Sir Shenanigans avatarSir Shenanigans
Mall haul today (plus I split a BEAUTIFUL Star Wars Slave I with my brother). Any thoughts on Haze? Wanted to play it back when it came out and I had no PS3. For a dollar you can't go wrong!
Dreamweaver avatarDreamweaver
I'm not gonna lie, I don't feel "good" about the upcoming "ignore" feature. Maybe it's just me, but I don't like the idea that people can mute other people because they don't agree with them. Spammers and trolls, sure, but not regular community members.
Gundy avatarGundy
Oh man. Those Next Gen transformations in Megadimension Neptunia are legit as fuck!
TysonOfTime avatarTysonOfTime
The first thing I do when I see clickbait is click on it and complain about clickbait.
LinkSlayer64 avatarLinkSlayer64
Wow, uh, after having a lovely time with Kirby Air Ride, I decided to try playing some melee, for old times sake... I pretty much disliked my whole time with it. More details in a comment if I get around to it.
Jiraya avatarJiraya
Help me gather games for a new blog series - "Worst Sequels Ever"
Niero Desu avatarNiero Desu
The backend code on the site so fun to read. Going through some of Julio's old stuff: if($vars["fappers"]){ $fappoids = 0; $_xt_loop_name = "fappers"; $vars["fappers_cnt"] = count($vars["fappers"]); reset($vars["fappers"]);
BaronVonSnakPak avatarBaronVonSnakPak
Watching the second Guyver Movie: Dark Hero, starring David -Solid Snake- Hayter. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Roie47-Cuk
The Dyslexic Laywer avatarThe Dyslexic Laywer
You didn't think I forgot what day it is did you?
Nathan D avatarNathan D
Gonna retire the MOARgasmic avatar for awhile.
OrochiLeona avatarOrochiLeona
Will you be mine?
Pixie The Fairy avatarPixie The Fairy
Got out of Deadpool. It definitely was a movie with Deadpool in it. Some parents were shocked to learn it was also rated R for a reason.
Sarah Jane farron avatarSarah Jane farron
So... gender and biology. All I'll say here is please respect people and their identities and don't try to push assumptions as fact. It doesn't need to be said to most here but denying people their identities is pretty harmful and very unpleasant.
Niwannabe avatarNiwannabe
Any PS4 recommendations for a guy who can't afford PS+, since all I've got is Battlefront and there's next to nothing to do in that game?
Niero Desu avatarNiero Desu
if you were experiencing lag with the dev site today, can you please try again? I moved some js around and am loading smaller avatars for people. some quickpost photos are scaled from gigantic raw uploads so we are optimizing those next to zip things up
more quickposts


Contest!


Seriously

Invert site colors

  Dark Theme
  Light Theme


Destructoid means family.
Living the dream, since 2006

Pssst. konami code + enter

modernmethod logo



Back to Top


We follow moms on   Facebook  and   Twitter
  Light Theme      Dark Theme
Pssst. Konami Code + Enter!
You may remix stuff our site under creative commons w/@
- Destructoid means family. Living the dream, since 2006 -