Heh, way to get aborto in trouble Jim. ^_^

I always thought the games are made specifically to make people feel naughty, but still feel good. Like getting a blowjob by your wife's sister in the park behind a tree in the middle of the day while her children are twenty feet away playing, and her dog is watching you with curious interest.

...

Or maybe that's just me.

That's not NSFW. Nipples or GTFO, that's my stance. Brian Ashcraft will back me up on this.

Game of the Year

Eh, it's not that bad. She has huge tits -- there's no way she's only 10. Besides, she was asking for it, laying around like that.

That's is so disgusting seriously, how can nintendo allow that?

@Justice

Maybe ... by looking the other way? Seriously, I dunno.

How hypocritical gaming sites are becoming.

Posting pics and videos of scandalous Japanese dating-sims/ero games and simultaneously adopting a superior moral stance.

May as well go watch Fox News.

Doki Doki Majo Shimpan for the grown up set?

Hay let's be outraged by a game made in another country that we'll never see and act all "holier than thou" and shit.

+1

The game got a Cero (Teen equivalent) rating in Japan.

sooo is this like on the black market or does it have a nintendo seal?

I'll buy 2. No! 3. NO! 10!

Also, Foxtoid News

Can someone tell me how to pronounce the name of developer upinus? I would like it to be "you-peenis" or "up-in-us" if possible. Thanks.

Ha, yeah, how dare me find parts of Japanese culture perverse. How DARE me not approve of the underlying pedo-friendly shit that goes on there. Some people might like how young looking and sounding girls in anime are, but I find it a little disturbing.

It's not a Fox News scenario where I want it banned. I just find it pretty fucking iffy. But like I said, go have fun. I'm sure the grown men playing this also think it's "funny."

No, how dare you do so and simultaneously post pictures and videos catering to the perversions you oppose.

If you don't approve of such images REMOVE THEM FROM YOUR ARTICLE.

Uh, they're there so people can SEE them. Unlike some people, immediate posting of anime images does = FAP FAP FAP. They're obviously examples meant for people to look through.

Yes, if I hold up a Coke can and say, "THIS SHIT IS DISGUSTING", then I'm TOTALLY promoting Coca-Cola. That makes a lot of sense.

Correction: does NOT = FAP FAP FAP

Comparing Coca-Cola to (vritual) child porn doesn't make a lot of sense, either.

In an effort to reduce accusations of Nazi hypocrisy and promote innocence, I have adapted the header image. Should show in a few moments.

@UnexplainedDemonArm

And I didn't compare the two. My comparison was of what constitutes "promoting" something. You expect a games site, of all places, to make a criticism of a certain game or product without showing examples? Most people can look at them and say, "Yep, that's pretty grotesque". Does the evening news show photos of a murder or crime scene because they actually "approve" of it? No.

Putting an example up of something for people to judge it for themselves does not = approval.

Does the evening news show photos of a murder or crime scene because they actually "approve" of it? No.

Often done in a sensationalist manner.

You expect a games site, of all places, to make a criticism of a certain game or product without showing examples?

With respect to this subject matter, yes, I do indeed.

MaxVest: What about breast implants in virtual children who are made of shit?

Weeabos rallying to Japan's defense ready, set, GO!

And is that a toddler?!?!?

Well, first and foremost, Dtoid writers aren't "journalists". So the typical criticism of "sensationalism" honestly don't apply. Writers are allowed to give forthright opinions, rather than just straight and unbiased fact. Not to mention, I think the term itself is entirely overused. There's nothing wrong with being controversial, or attention-grabbing (two of the primary aspects of sensationalism), as long as there's a point. If you're just posting tits to announce a tractor pull, that's sensationalism. Publishing pictures of the Holocaust victims when making the point that it was horrendous and vile? Not so much.

I'm not saying I'd ever support someone writing about how blatant child pornography is wrong and then posting videos of it, no. (Especially since that's illegal, and with good reason). But there is a highly discernible difference between just posting images for attention and posting images to support and illustrate your point.

Not to mention, once you're already at Dtoid, pictures are visible and the hits have been generated. Someone clicking a link from Gametab aren't going to see the picture until they're already there. So saying someone posted the images "just so people would click on the story" is dumb. Dtoid is one entity, the writers aren't in competition with each other over who reads any one story.