Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Official statement issued on Modern Warfare 2 video leak photo

It took an entire day for Activision to get around to it, but the the publisher has issued an official statement on the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 footage that made the rounds yesterday. Yes, it's legit; but according to Activision, that's not indicative of the full game experience.

Their full statement:

The leaked footage was taken from a copy of game that was obtained illegally and is not representative of the overall gameplay experience in Modern Warfare 2

Infinity Ward’s Modern Warfare 2 features a deep and gripping storyline in which players face off against a terrorist threat dedicated to bringing the world to the brink of collapse.  The game includes a plot involving a mission carried out by a Russian villain who wants to trigger a global war.  In order to defeat him, the player infiltrates his inner circle.  The scene is designed to evoke the atrocities of terrorism. 

At the beginning of the game, players encounter a mandatory “checkpoint” in which they are warned that an upcoming segment may contain disturbing elements and they can choose not to engage in the gameplay that involves this scene.  Consistent with its content, the game has been given an “M” for Mature by the Entertainment Software Ratings Board.  The rating is prominently displayed on the front and back of the packaging, as well as in all advertising.

This echoes, in part, the statements issued earlier by Infinity Ward. But now that everyone has spoken up, what's your take?


Continue: More Xbox 360 stories





prev
next 50 comments

74 comments | showing # 1 to 50

thenooby1's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:29
thenooby1
Regardless of who is and isn't a double agent, I don't like the idea of gunning down civilians in a airport.
Tarvu's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:34
Tarvu
Tomorrow I'll be playing GTA4 once more.

I'm going to kill a merry fuckload of civilian NPCs, it's inevitable.

Blah Artistic plot licence games fick silth.

I'm bored of this news.
Elsa's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:34
Elsa
I'll wait to play the actual game... but no, I don't think that this needed to be included. I'm glad the segment is skippable and am still unsure as to what I will do. I will likely play through that section and see if it's possible to not kill anyone and still proceed.
Jon B's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:35
Jon B
"they are warned that an upcoming segment may contain disturbing elements and they can choose not to engage in the gameplay that involves this scene."

And thus, shitstorm partially avoided. And I congratulate IW on their bold move.

Plus, it's not going to be hard to find the dude with a stolen copy, he shows his mug in the TV's reflection multiple times.
Kamikaze Slowey's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:37
Kamikaze Slowey
"..can choose not to engage in the gameplay" Why? This is apart of the world they have created. It is apart of the story they want to express and tell. I see that as if you skipped a chapter in a book. I doubt the characters will not mention it, they are not going to just not bring it up every if you choose to skip it. So why act like it never happen? What if you choose to skip the nuke of MW1.
Cacophony's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:37
Cacophony
I'm glad to hear they decided not to panic and abandon the level, though I imagine it'd be a little late for that.

I find the level idea interesting and refreshing. I for one look forward to playing it.
testmunky's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:41
testmunky
@thenooby1
You shouldn't like the idea of gunning down civilians, I imagine thats the purpose of the level to elicit a visceral and uncomfortable response from the player.
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:42
Xzyliac
I think I'm with Elsa. Again I don't think the scene shouln't exist, it has every right, just not sure if I dig it or not.

Ironically wasn't there a post about pointless sex earlier today? Does this not fall under the same category?
Jonathan Melancon's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:43
Jonathan Melancon
@Kamikaze because irl, there would be a shitstorm of bullets, and they wouldn't be able to tell if you actually killed anyone. So you don't have to. But I will.
JACK of No Trades's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:46
JACK of No Trades
Im glad it can be skipped. I don't want MW2 to turn me into a killer. My mind can't handle violence being depicted on 3D polygons. Those NPC's are real and feel pain. If this game was a movie or a book I would have been able to handle the violence. Games are evil and they turn you into the guy the hosts Wheel of Furtune.
Cartman's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:47
Cartman
In before shitstorm: Part 2
JACK of No Trades's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:49
JACK of No Trades
@Elsa & Xzyliac

If a game is too hard on your conscious then real life must make you fearful medicated recluses.
Cartman's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:49
Cartman
Also, this dude whos leaking all this shit has Activision by the balls.
Necro BABS's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:51
Necro BABS
I'm glad they are sticking to their guns about this.
TeeHee's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:51
TeeHee
Why the fuss about gunning down the civilians? those revolutionaries have wives and children too!
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:55
Xzyliac
@JACK of No Trades
Uhh, sorry if going around in an airport shooting civilians isn't my idea of a typical Thursday night about town.

Seriously what kind of logic is that?

"You don't like killing people? Pfft, you're weird."
testmunky's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:58
testmunky
@Xzyliac
Whether or not the level is merely a gratuitous slaughterfest will hinge largely on how it fits into the rest of the story and what dramatic impact it has. If the level is able to impact the player and makes them more emotionally invested in the story/game then I think it will have accomplished what IW was aiming for. If, on the other hand, it is simply a disposable shooting gallery that has no real tie to the rest of the story then it will be shocking exercise done for its own sake.
JACK of No Trades's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 17:58
JACK of No Trades
@Xzyliac

Please tell me you have never played GTA then. If you have you are a big hypocrite.
Vectrex's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 18:01
Vectrex
I'll switch off my night vision goggles when that part of the game comes up.
Infinite Combo's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 18:01
Infinite Combo
I just saw the video after searching for several minutes. Activision's really active about taken it down. I just hope that something like that in real life doesn't happen or else the game may be delayed or edited. After watching the video I am a bit more excited to play the game. Infinity Ward defnitely took a risk by including it, but it will pay off by giving you a story/experience that no other game has. You can already do much worse than this in GTA 4, so if you own that game and boycott this game because of one part you are hypocrite.

Link to where I found the video
Xzyliac's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 18:03
Xzyliac
@JACK
Contrary to everyone else I played GTA IV without slaughtering everyone. And before that no I didn't play GTA because it was boring.

@testmunky
That's how I feel. What is the context? What is the point? Am I just supposed to feel bad? If so then I'll probably play it because it's an important draw into the game and I enjoy that. If it's just a free for all that would bug me.

Again it has the right to exist and I'm not sided either way. I just a lot of people are quick to jump on the bandwagon without even trying to objectively look at the other side of the argument. And there's plenty of reasons to be bothered by it.

I'm surprise no military gamers have chimed in.
mhall23's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 18:04
mhall23
why the fuss, Iv killed thousounds of innocent people in games over the years, Nuked the poor people in Megaton in Fallout 3, god knows how many people in GTA. don't really see how this is any different really.
HEL105's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 18:14
HEL105
Some of you are angry that the people who don't want to participate in this part of the game, won't have to. That's absolutely hilarious to me.
TheDreadHawk's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 18:22
TheDreadHawk
@Xzyliac

"Uhh, sorry if going around in an airport shooting civilians isn't my idea of a typical Thursday night about town. "

But your typical Thursday night consists of going into fantasy worlds and saving princesses? Or being a criminal mastermind? Or fighting the Government in a post-apocalypse Washington D.C.?

Damn, that's exciting, bro.
SephirothX's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 18:30
SephirothX
As I said before, from that video it looks like you can get through that whole level without having to kill a civilian
stalydan's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 18:47
stalydan
@ thenooby1

Oh who gives a crap, you're given the choice to skip the level if you don't want to play it.
grasslunatic's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 18:50
grasslunatic
I think we should wait before the game comes out before we decide if it's tasteless or not.
StingingVelvet's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 18:51
StingingVelvet
They are not real people, they are polygons. FYI.

I find it amusing this creates a stir when we have movies and books that exist for no other reason that to joyfully show the gruesome and torurous deaths of innocent people. People love that crap.

If we admit games are different, we invite endless censorship and control over them by our nanny-state government. That would do us all so much good, to be more like Germany or Australia in this regard... I would just LOVE it, by which I mean, I would hate all of you for causing it.

And yes, in Grand Theft Auto I go on merry killing sprees for the sheer absurd fun of it, and I kill tons of cops and grandmas and I run people over, then backup and run them over again, and it's all a freaking BLAST, because it is fantasy, it is not real. Repeat: IT IS NOT REAL.
Dan CiTi's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 18:59
Dan CiTi
Man, the more I look at this screenshots and similar ones, I can't help to think about how improved and informative the HUD is.
Davedude's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 19:02
Davedude
I want to see the video :[
Ninja In Distress's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 19:03
Ninja In Distress
What Dan CiTi said. Its so streamlined and informative!
Holyetheline's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 19:08
Holyetheline
It still doesn't bother me at all... I dunno, I'm just not that kind of guy.
Moonwalker1982's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 19:20
Moonwalker1982
See? You infiltrate their inner circle, you ain't even the terrorist himself.
It's just a game and nothing but a game, i've always seen them as fun and anything
can happen. I don't know why this would disturb me.
ace of knaves's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 19:33
ace of knaves
Oh, this is going to be fantastic. Seriously, I'm really excited to see how this is going to be handled, and how the game lets you play through it.
Isaac Bertrand's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 19:38
Isaac Bertrand
News story number one

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33520338/ns/technology_and_science-games/
Static Jak's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 19:50
Static Jak
I'll play it without a problem. Might play it a few times too for the laugh. Those poor little polygons all helpless and whatnot.
Who gives a crap. Holywood has been doing this for decades and games have been doing it for around a decade.
It's meant to set the mood (and give you an idea of how crazy your enemy is) in the same way the execution scene and nuke in COD4 did. And now to slaughter a few hundred innocent polygons for no apparent reason in Saints Row 2.
Velt's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 20:26
Velt
So, still no dedicated servers?
Zero_'s Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 20:34
Zero_
So, originally there were people who were pissed off that this even existed... understandable. But now there are a subset of people that are pissed off that it's only an optional scene? LOL
Sir Scottrick's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 20:35
Sir Scottrick
Like some have already said, it seems like you could go through the entire scene without being forced to actually shoot at civilians--maybe shoot past them at a wall or something so as not to blow your cover.

In any case, it seems to me brilliant. Not often do games force you to think more deeply about reality--about morality, choice, and consequence, about the difficulty in knowing right and wrong in a war-torn world. I enjoy games that are more "mindless," to be sure. But it is a game like this (as it seems) that really moves a person, and creates an unforgettable memory. I'll never forget the first time I played through Metal Gear Solid on PSone for this reason. It moved me. It made me think about the world--about advancing technology, about evil and good.

I might also add that, a game that engages with the sort of themes MW2 seems to, will only help games finally to be taken more seriously as works of "art"--things which display incredible human creativity, and engage audience's mind like other forms of art and literature. Maybe my hopes are too high in that regard, but still--I think this game will go on my shelf forever as a "classic."
andycadaver's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 20:37
andycadaver
Do not care.
Funksy's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 20:39
Funksy
While I'm not AGAINST them allowing people to skip it, I think I AM against the trend or perception this may create.

StingingVelvet really hit the nail on the head. By doing this, it almost seems like we're ADMITTING that games ARE different in the emotions and effects they can have on us. And like he also said, being different in this case is a bad thing.

I think I'd rather they had not put this option in there, but at the same time I can't be mad at it because more player control is almost always a good thing. Now if we could only convince them that dedicated servers are a good thing... Bastards
OFPSniper's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 21:48
OFPSniper
Dude i can't wait to play this game...i'm gonna shoot all the terrorists in that mission and then enjoy my stroll through the airport as i personally gun down each and every civilian! it's a game you bunch of retards lol. it doesnt influence people to do stupid things. Stupid people do stupid things because there just that...Stupid or ignorant. get over it your shooting Pixels man.
Grandmas Boy's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 21:50
Grandmas Boy
IT'S A GAME. Fucking get over it.
Qraze's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 22:03
Qraze
i applaud them for doing this.
still won't get it, evil activision.

if you live in britain, and american troops comes in shooting everything and proclaiming its right to do so, who would the video game make you play as?

if you live in america and british troops come in shooting everything and proclaiming its right to do so, who would the video game make you play as?

there is only one answer. see how one sided games are now? the american government and esrb lap dogs have set standards and policies no one sees.
Woocifer's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 22:19
Woocifer
Let the whinging begin...my god..it's a video game, just the same as Red Dawn is a movie, and Kermit the Frog is a puppet.

If this bugs you, you are weak. And not only that, an insecure pussy.
Roryzilla's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 22:22
Roryzilla
I'm dissapointed that they include the option to skip the mission. That's fucking retarded, Infinty Ward. If you are going to make a strong statement, then make it, don't bitch out or cater to people who won't get the message. Just doing that limits your future creativity and sets you and the entire industry for more bans and censorship.
Shadowiii's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 22:24
Shadowiii
I've had my two cents in the other thread, but I just wanted to add one final piece.
The official statement is to "evoke the atrocities of terrorism."
Why on earth do they then have the PLAYER DO these atrocities of terrorism? Yes, everybody is going to throw the "video games are just pixels" (completely ignoring arguments they've violently made in the past that their medium of choice should be taken seriously because of the emotions and ideas it can project), but how the hell is this in any sense good taste?
It seems like a cash-in on getting news propaganda (which it will) so people will buy the game, and by using jumping on the tragedy that was 9/11 to just sell more copies of their game seems downright sick to me.
I do not promote video game censorship, nor do I think playing video games directly links to violent behavior, etc. But saying it doesn't influence you whatsoever is downright incorrect. Activision/Infinity Ward is cashing in on our enraged or excited emotions, and using a recent tragedy to do it. Even if it should be a part of the story, it is still distasteful.
Just my two cents. I'm interested to see how this plays out come November.
TheJesusNinja26's Avatar - Comment posted on 10/28/2009 22:32
TheJesusNinja26
I will be skipping that portion of the game, no need to subject myself to that travashamockery. It bothers me because I'm strong in my love for other human beings, if that bothers you I feel for your family.
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 

   Got news?   tips@destructoid.com   |   Dtoid Twitter

New Videos

more videos


Reviews & Previews
BioShock 2 review
Dante's Inferno review
Chime review
Hustle Kings review
iPhone Review Round-up: January review
more reviews
Dawn of War II Chaos Rising
Metro 2033
A trip to the racetracks Days of Thunder Arcade
Double the pleasure, double the fun with Darwinia+
Wizarding world in plastic Lego Harry Potter Years 1-4
more previews


- The Dtoid Army is 56735 strong -

Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

Call for entries: the Areas of my Expertise

New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide


 Originals
Jim Sterling: How Aliens are blatantly better than Predators





















More Destructoid Originals




We are Destructoid   tips@destructoid.com
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Niero
Founder, Big Boss
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Dale North
News Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Destructoid Video EIC
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Brad Nicholson
Managing Editor
Tom Fronczak Colette Bennett
Ashley Davis Ben Perlee
Conrad
Zimmerman
Chad Concelmo
Jonathan Holmes Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Will Maddock Matthew Razak
Josh Tolentino
Joseph Leray
Topher Cantler Samit Sarkar
     
  Adam Dork
Daniel Lingen
Hollie Bennett
Joe Burling
Mikey Turvey






 
 
  get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
contribute a news tip
suggest a feature
be a guest editor
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meetup+play online
seriously

about Destructoid
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator
Despingation?




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006