Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Ode to the Extra Life photo

Oh, extra life, how we adore thee. You're always there to pick us back up when we have fallen. You're always there to heal our every wound up good as new. You are a stalwart companion and an indispensible element in fighting the good fight even when the chips are down. Oh, extra life, how could we ever have lived (again) without you?

We couldn't. Could you imagine if the "extra life" was never realized? Everybody deserves a second (or third) chance, don'tcha think? That is one of the founding principles behind the extra life. Retrospectively, the extra life was born from a few other defining factors.

(Hit the jump to continue onward)

  

Origins of the Extra Life

For starters, the thought of giving players extra chances after failing was primarily found in pinball machines before anything else. The idea of giving three balls, instead of just one, prolonged the experience and also gave the player a sense of comfort in the beginning and a sense of urgency when their last ball was in play.

From there on, "extended play" was soon adopted by the arcade industry to entice players to spend more money and continue playing. Many arcade games of the 1980's offered rewards of an extra life for achieveing certain milestones in their point scores. For example, Namco's Galaga gave the player an extra life after reaching 20,000 points. In this way, the player's ability is being acknowledged and thus creating a feeling of worth for the actions that he/she is doing. This, in turn, creates a feeling of gratification that makes the overall experience that much more enjoyable. As we all know, people will go out of their way and spend large sums of money for any sort of gratification. Arcade games were no different.

Evolution of the Extra Life

Over the years, the extra life has taken on many forms, shapes, and sizes. The iconic "1up Mushroom" from Super Mario Bros. is surely a welcome sight to any gamer. However, the fasion in which it is obtained greatly differs from the old days of simply scoring enough points. Rather, they were hidden within the levels, waiting to be found by thorough players. As you can see, the fundamental idea of rewarding players with extra lives has not changed, but the methods in which they are awarded has. Today, this is now a fairly common practice among most games that have some sort of "lives" based system. The extra life is as much a fixture in gaming as water is a fixture in life.

Another evolution of this basic principal is found in games with "respawning." Though there are no set amount of "lives" per se, there is, however, a system in which play is continued even after a loss or failure to complete a certain task has occured. Respawning may be completely different from the classic way of continuing play, but it was certainly influenced by it.

Living the Extra Life... and taking it for granted.

You know, it sure is great to be living in a world where you're given extra chances, no matter how bad you screw up. But what if the extra life was never implemented? What if you only had a single chance to beat an entire game, and no way to increase those chances? Needless to say that games would have definitely become far too difficult for most to pick up. Perhaps the arcade craze of the 1980's would never even have happened because people would be too frustrated to pump any more money into the machine after losing so quickly and so often. It's a stretch, but if this would have happened, then our favorite past-time may not have come as far as it is now. Kinda makes you rethink about the importance of that "1up" you just scored by getting 20,000 points.

Indeed, we may have taken the extra life for granted. But rest assured, the extra life does not take us for granted. Because without the players, it holds no value. Just remember that the next time you get an extra life, a mushroom, respawn, or whatever keeps you going after you would've been long gone, that it holds a special place in the history of gaming and should be respected as such.


Continue: More Pimps of gaming stories





prev next

20 comments | showing # 1 to 20

bhive01's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/26/2007 17:04
bhive01
Do games exist without the extra life/continue/spawn system? I can think of none...
Niero's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/26/2007 17:09
Niero
1 UP GET! Yup, most casual games on the PS3 network still use this system
branflakesinmilk's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/26/2007 17:15
branflakesinmilk
Nothing brings a sense of relief into a shmuppers heart like that magic jingle that means you've earned an extra life.
Lord_Satorious's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/26/2007 17:25
Lord_Satorious
Batman for the Atari Lynx. One life, one health bar, one chance to get through the _entire_ game. And the game was ridiculously difficult to boot. The horror... the horror...

Finite lives is an outdated idea. Hell, health in terms of percentages is old, as are health packs. Regenerating health is a lot easier to work with. Streamlining the gaming experience so that it's not just an item hunt makes for better gameplay. Lives may have a purpose in some genres, but not for platformers anymore, and certainly not for shooters.
talon84's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/26/2007 17:45
talon84
King Kong did not have extra lives. The only indication that the player was about to die was the screen washes over with blood and the sound lowers a bit. Then if the player damaged again he died. Most of the time this happened when the player was getting a chunk bitten out of them by a dinosaur.
Bill_Whiskey's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/26/2007 17:46
Bill_Whiskey
Just wanted to say this was a great read.
Loque's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/26/2007 17:51
Loque
Satorious, you're talking about things like halo 2, or the call of duty series, aren't you?

I hate that system. Regenerating health made it so that you didn't have to search out that health pack, no, but you did just have to sit behind a rock and wait for your life to come back. I'd rather play a game that you have to conserve your life, and try NOT to get shot. Oh the sighs of relief when you walk into a room and see 5 health packs on the floor. You knew you were safe then, for the time being.

Way to easy. It doesn't streamline the gaming experience, it makes it easier.
PITT sauce's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/26/2007 18:01
PITT sauce
Jaws for NES. nuff said.
Resarf's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/26/2007 18:03
Resarf
@ Loque

Regenerating health doesn't make a game easer. You dick around in a game like Gears of War and you'll be dead in seconds.
Loque's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/26/2007 18:18
Loque
@Resarf Not true. I was a chainsaw master in Gears of War. I "dicked around" quite a bit, and usually survived.
Necros's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/26/2007 21:29
Necros
@ bhive01

Off the top of my head: Katamari has no lives, continues, or spawns. Also, the Wario Land series before Wario Land 4. I'm sure they're more.

Also, if you enjoyed this article, there's a related article about death in video games in the Feb. 13 issue of The Escapist.
Eleo's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/26/2007 21:34
Eleo
@Logue I'm sure that won't work in insane mode.

There should be a game where not only do you not get any extra lives but you can't even start the game over. When you lose, the game would eject itself from the console and self destruct.

Hardest game ever.
Teh Ted's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/26/2007 22:09
Teh Ted
Great read...good work.

@Eleo - I bet it's for the PS3 too. When the game ejects it burns down your house and then sells itself on Ebay. That would kick major ass.

The sequel would videotape you getting your ass kicked and post it on youtube. And the microtransactions would add funny little sound effects and slo-mos of you getting your shit ruined.

I expect EA to pick it up tomorrow.
Loque's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/26/2007 23:52
Loque
@eleo yes, because the difficulty of the game has anything to do with the way life is done.

I'm sure if in Gears you had a life bar, and died just as (or nearly as) easily, it'd be just as hard, or even harder, no?
Pangloss's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/27/2007 00:15
Pangloss
Remember Steel Battalion? You die, that's it. You should have ejected.

@Loque: If Gears had a life bar (a bad way of putting it, in any game the bar's there whether you see it or not), the game would be broken. In Insane, you just wouldn't be able to play it, because it'd be way to hard. And Multiplayer? Forget it. If there were health pickups, and they were behind any sort of cover, it would devolve into a camp-fest, i.e. multiplayer is actually dumbed down. Gears only works with regenerating health.

Regen vs. non-regen really comes down to the game it's in. A system may work well for some games, but not for others.
Mxyzptlk's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/27/2007 01:29
Mxyzptlk
@ Pangloss:

I was thinking the same thing about Steel Battalion.

And isn't it creepy that Mega Man's 1up was his head? If came across a big replica of my own severed head, I'd probably just stay the hell away from it.
Firesky's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/27/2007 07:17
Firesky
Nethack, along with most roguelikes, give the player only one life, requiring you to restart the entire game if you die. Dying is usually very easy in roguelike games. Nethack is often considered one of the hardest games in existence.
bhive01's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/27/2007 11:16
bhive01
@necros

Thanks for the escapist link. Good story there on Dying in games.

@Satorius

I forgot about Batman on the Lynx. My friend had a lynx and that Batman game was pretty cool for it's time, and I think I remember it having only one life as well.
JuanClaudius's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/27/2007 12:12
JuanClaudius
@branflakesinmilk:
HOLY CRAP ARE YOU ONE OF THE REAL BRAN FLAKES?! if so, who? I know a fellow who's worked with you.
christpunchermpls's Avatar - Comment posted on 02/28/2007 13:56
christpunchermpls
Damn fine article, damn fine!
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 

   Got news?   tips@destructoid.com   |   Dtoid Twitter

New Videos

more videos


Reviews & Previews
BioShock 2 review
Dante's Inferno review
Chime review
Hustle Kings review
iPhone Review Round-up: January review
more reviews
Dawn of War II Chaos Rising
Metro 2033
A trip to the racetracks Days of Thunder Arcade
Double the pleasure, double the fun with Darwinia+
Wizarding world in plastic Lego Harry Potter Years 1-4
more previews


- The Dtoid Army is 56723 strong -

Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

Call for entries: the Areas of my Expertise

New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide


 Originals
Jim Sterling: How Aliens are blatantly better than Predators





















More Destructoid Originals




We are Destructoid   tips@destructoid.com
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Niero
Founder, Big Boss
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Dale North
News Editor
Rey Gutierrez
Destructoid Video EIC
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Brad Nicholson
Managing Editor
Tom Fronczak Colette Bennett
Ashley Davis Ben Perlee
Conrad
Zimmerman
Chad Concelmo
Jonathan Holmes Jonathan Ross
Brad Rice Jordan Devore
Will Maddock Matthew Razak
Josh Tolentino
Joseph Leray
Topher Cantler Samit Sarkar
     
  Adam Dork
Daniel Lingen
Hollie Bennett
Joe Burling
Mikey Turvey






 
 
  get involved

register or login
post a blog
post a forum
enter a contest
contribute a news tip
suggest a feature
be a guest editor
support

new member's guide
login assistance
tech support
report abuse
email our editors
read our dev blog
nuclear crisis?
keep in touch

RSS feed
Twitter
Facebook
Myspace
Flickr
Game nights
Meetup+play online
seriously

about Destructoid
advertising
terms of use
privacy policy
jobs at MM
buy our crap
our network

Tomopop
Japanator
Despingation?




Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
living the dream since March 16, 2006