...Dungeoneering?
I'm a bit confused. Is he saying there's no sex at all on "mainstream" American TV? Not even some kissing and a few enthusiastic embraces (which is just about what qualified as a (US-only) sex "scandal" in Mass Effect)?
I'm normally a supporter of including the choice of romantic involvement in a game, especially one like Alpha Protocol. But the amount of generalizations floating around lately is getting a bit crazy. Any RPG without sex is an injustice?
However, is that really what he said? To me, it sounded more like he was trying to suggest that refusing to depict sex for what is really is is an injustice. That is, if we're supposed to be the ones in control of a situation, shouldn't we have the choice to engage in sex in whatever way we want--within the boundaries of the game, of course.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the quote or the way it was used.
@kauza: I think the point was that if a character's romantic development leads naturally to sex, it's stupid and counterintuitive to pull up short, to censor yourself. Especially in what is ostensibly the most story/character-driven genre of games.
That said, I'm sort of inclined to agree with jsutcliffe on this one. Graphics have come a long way since the PS1 days, but they still can't make it look truly "real", and so sex just looks awkward and completely devoid of emotion.
Maybe it'll be worth having in 10 years, but for now I'm good with the occasional sex mini-game in my God of War games.
Hey, they give you experience points.
But, it would really add so much more to the story if my character had to take a break from saving the world in order to take a big, stinky shit. Then just think of the great character development it would create:
Courtesy flush- add one point to dexterity
No oourtesy flush- add two points to stamina
Wipe ass- add two points to charisma
Don't wipe ass- lose two points of charisma, add one point to defense
@kohelhunter
As someone who is Christain I agree completely. There's having a religion and trying to play off as if every single word in the bible is absolute truth that should imidiately negate all science. I see that as disrepecting God, christains and the human race all in one go.
If it must happen, at least do it in good taste please.
Plus I wanna see boobies.
You're right. RPGs should never try and tackle realistic situations because they have non-realistic elements. Let's never try and make games with grounded issues!
Until developers can figure out how to do love and sex in a better way than a direct to video "National Lampoon" movie crossed with a Freddie Prinze schmaltz-fest, I don't think we should.
There are sex scenes in rated M games.
Then obviously the games are NOT for little kids. The media should, instead of blaming developers and "the industry", talk to the parents about this and maybe convince them to not buy -insert RPG with sex- for their 9 year old eh?
Oh and why make such a big deal out of something not especially even "graphic". And DryBones, if you wanna see boobies, thats what the internet is for oO
Not at all. As long as "building a plot" is explored or the mechanic exists has real meat to it.
There was a discussion here recently around morality in games and how it wasn't implemented well enough, not enough choices and ramifications. A similar argument can be leveled against sex in games. Should developers invest the time to essentially add a dating/relationship simulator into a 20-100+ hour RPG or should they allow the player navigate a few conversation trees followed by a "press A to bang this chick" to shoehorn in sex scenes? I'm intrigued by thought of the addition and exploration through a built-in simulator, but insulted by other.
C'mon people, this is marketing talk, plain and simple. "Buy my game because the characters are more deep and engaging - See! They have SEX!"
Most likely, sex will be used in games just like it's used in most TV series or movies - not as a means to build more believable characters, but as a means to keep you watching/playing despite the paper-thin relationships actually on display.
Video Game sex done poorly: God Of War.
I don't care if you get a few extra orbs, it just seems unnecessary to me.
Well... anything relevant to the story and/or gameplay is fine by me. As long as the sex thing isn't overhyped as it always is in society now a days.
However, I have a question for all of you: Why is it so important that we put sex in games? Why is it such a big deal that we have to have it in our RPGs? I enjoy my games just as much with sex as without it. In fact, I would even go so far as to say that I don't like having sex in my RPGs. Take, for example, Fable II. The game is about avenging your dead sister and saving the planet. Why would I, as the character, want to waste time getting my rocks off when I've got a planet to save?
Because all games need more of that too...
For example what type of sex does your character have? Is your character depraved or dark? Bondage is an interesting idea. If your character is tried and true hero more traditional venues open up. And what of villains? What is worse a Lich hellbent on destruction or a warlord who sold your sister into sex slavery. Or even used magic to warp her mind into twisted desires.
I'm not saying that sex should or even has to be shown but aspects of sex might expand a game. It might change one's perspective and allow people to delve into their own motivations and psyches. You don't have to make a game all about sex. Just throw some in there to have us explore our id and libido. Introduce morals and moral consequences. Let that succubus tempt us. Let us woo the barmaid and leave only to find we have a child when we return.
Love and lust are great aspects of a character's story. Let's explore them. Embrace them. Just don't necessarily put a whole lot of emphasis on it. After all... it's just sex people.
Three cheers for Chronic Logic and Wastedyears. Good arguments.
<a href="http://www.sextoyshopping.co.uk/" title="sex toys">sex toys</a>
its worth a look http://www.sex-toy-warehouse.co.uk/
Most likely, sex will be used in games just like it's used in most TV series or movies - not as a means to build more believable characters, but as a means to keep you watching/playing despite the paper-thin relationships actually on display.
We all have bodies.
What could drive the isolated masses to get familiar with the sight of asses? The stress of this might fog their glasses, but it's beautiful in a way that, to them, just passes.
If you're not comfortable with other people's bodies, you're most likely not comfortable with your own. Sleep nude, or something, don't be such a downer.
"However, I have a question for all of you: Why is it so important that we put sex in games? ... Why would I, as the character, want to waste time getting my rocks off when I've got a planet to save?"
That character would not waste their time if such pressing matters must be attended to.
But a common thug picking on traveling caravans, a homely waitress living on bread, basically 'characters' would.
Even a War Veteran would have to debrandish his armour at one point. Even if not, what of the servants bringing him wine? Or the Cook who goes home to his family? It can't just be outright ignored, and shunned as a horrific act - though can be fairly omitted in different world settings.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow