I need more info to make an educated comment!
It's not a step forward for desktops, obviously, but it has -a lot- of potential as a tablet OS. Seriously.
I'm excited about tablets for the first time.. period.
On a regular PC, the only way you would need it "certified" is to live in MS's app store which take precedence on the end-users start screen. There is no lock in so from a technical standpoint, the OS is fine. In fact, it even has some features like Shared Storage that would tempt me if they didn't make it so touch happy.
With it being so touch happy though, I would be tempted with one of those x86 based Surface tablets. it would be the only tablet I'd ever consider. The RT one, not so much. That ARM based one must use the MS store for apps, so it's the same walled garden that iOS suffers from.
Notch just sometimes says random, stupid stuff - happened before, will happen again. He is that rich, eccentric guy, that you can't really get, you see in movies sometimes.
And Valve lashing on W8 and their market is laughable, as they also requires certification on their platform, but on Steam you never fucking know if they feel like putting it on today, or will you be forced to reapply for it next month, "because stuff". From that perspective I prefer MS's checklist - all points checked? You are in.
@SephirothX
Indeed. It's pretty strange. 95, bad. 97, good. ME, bad. XP, good. Vista, bad. 7, good. 8, probably bad.
It's like they go out of their way to keep the tradition alive.
I need more info to make an educated comment!"
Maybe I'm wrong here, but I think maybe the reference is to this new App Store-type thing Microsoft is pushing. Essentially, MS is introducing its own Apple style locked down App store. Sounds pretty evil when taken by itself.
However, two things to keep in mind: 1. To my knowledge, true Windows 8 will still be perfectly capable of running games and programs outside of this infrastructure. If I'm wrong, could someone correct me? 2. Within the context of the store, it will be easy to develop for and release games across Windows 8, Windows RT, Windows Phone 8, and, probably, whatever Microsoft is cooking up for home consoles.
Unless I'm wrong, there will still be flexibility with Windows 8, but there are some decent upsides to going through their app store.
Its not about metro being annoying to use, its all about microsoft trying to monopolize the distribution of software/games sure you can use the classic shell but the point is that the new enforced metro shell is completely controlled by microsoft just like apple enforces ios a bit less like the more liberal way google rules android market as you can still after some changes install your own stuff and it will function in the exact same ways and besides that google doesn't screen. This however is a step back from the way people can install whatever they want, noone censoring what you can install. No requirement to pay a portion of your profits to M$. yes if you use steam you pay some to steam and so does it go with other distributers but you have the full choice in how you want to distribute, you can do so through your own site like minecraft does also so really a big bit of freedom lost. Sure you can still do this stuff on the classic desktop but not on the new interface microsoft centers windows 8 around. which essentially gives programs obtained in other ways a lesser position.
I must admit
Steam already does this, but it's an optional way for indie devs to get more exposure. Plus, I can't see Steam being profitable for Valve on the Windows 8 system, because all purchases would (as I understand it, I could be wrong) have to go through Microsoft. Valve would only get a cut of a cut of the profit.
So.. everyone is getting mad at Microsoft for.. what? Releasing a Steam/Google Play/App Store competitor for its tablet and phone market? Or is it because they have the nerve to also have this competitor compete on desktops?
Saying that - you can always create regular apps, that people will download from your website, install (they will have to click the box - just like in Win7 - that this app doesn't have a certificate, yada yada, do you want to allow it to modify files) and use.
It's awesome for non-power users - so they can keep all their apps up-to-date from one place, and it do nothing for power users, because you can still install anything you want - nothing changes here.
no it's not. it's actually to allow only complete games without massive bugs and glitches on the platform. given the fact that entire Notch's business is build around selling games that aren't half finished that are patched for years to become stable versions. in this light original version of Minecraft would never be certified and same goes to Sword of the Stars II and Elemental: War of Magic - commercial products that were released and wouldn't work for months.
Yeah, personally, I see Windows 8 as a interesting new approach to tablet design. If it works, I'd love to get one. LOVE.
However, my desktop will be running Windows 7 for quite sometime. It's clear that Windows 8 doesn't take the desktop elements seriously, even though W8 tablets will be rather more capable than the competition.
On linux you can make almost everything auto update, if its not included in the update repositories already you can just manually add them and it will auto update.
People are frightened of things they don't understand.
Notch thinks it's fine to put Minecraft through certification to get his product on Xbox Live Arcade (on the Xbox, which IS a closed platform) but the minute he is asked to do an (optional) certification for Windows 8 (which is a totally open platform, certification just means your product get a 'seal of approval') he throws a fit and says Microsoft is 'ruining the PC'?
The PC, which, even on Windows 8, will still run Steam and any non-certified app/game/installer you can find? The PC, which is basically not being changed structurally by Microsoft by the development of Windows 8? That PC?
Ok... my opinion of Notch hasn't changed then...
Because 2000, like NT before it, was meant for businesses, not consumers. Although XP is technically the successor of 2000 rather than ME, XP was developed for consumers, like ME, 98, and 95 were.
linux is not user friendly because nobody cares, make something user friendly does not need much effort, only will.
If linux became popular certainly will exist versions that please everyone.
Guess Microsoft should work a little harder on ruining the PC!
But that wasn't the point - the point was, all the tantrums are because of feature, that evolved from something, that is used in Linux systems for years and will not be dropped, regardless of its popularity - I would even argue it could be one of the biggest "selling points" for it - it is for me. Win8 is in no way less open, than Win7 and it don't "ruin the PC" - Notch just sometimes spews stupid stuff and Gabe is worried, that market will take money out of Valve's pocket.
Personally - I don't even think it would be completely his decision nowadays, whether Minecraft would be put through certification or not, as he have nothing to do, at least directly, with that project anymore.
1. I am an indie dev and MS might not certify my shitty games so I can't get a slice
2. I am a software dev/ digital distributor and Windows Store will cut into my margins
3. I am a dumbass bandwagoner that listens to Notch and Gabe Newell and never doubts they could be against anything that is not financially positive for them because I am a dumbass.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow