games  anime  |  toys
Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


No LAN for you: StarCraft II won't have local support photo

StarCraft II will not have LAN support.

Speaking with IncGamers, Blizzard’s vice president of game design Rob Pardo made it spectacularly clear that players won’t be able to play against each other the old way -- without the Internet. Instead, players will have to use the revolutionary Battle dot Net service to host, create and join matches.

“We don’t have plans to support LAN,” Pardo said shortly before putting the statement in stone with, “we will not support it.”

This, of course, comes with a caveat: IncGamers was speaking with a panel, and the other two guys, producer Chris Sigaty and lead designer Dustin Browder, weren’t so sure. They said Blizzard was still discussing it before Pardo answered.

Despite the disagreement within the panel, we’re sure StarCraft II won’t support LAN for a couple of reasons. First, Pardo knows. Second, this is the year 2009. This thing called the Internet lets people do all sorts of wild things like look at porn and play RTS games over it. Pretty hip, really.


Continue: More PC stories





prev
next 50 comments

72 comments | showing # 1 to 50

Midgetsnowman's Avatar
Midgetsnowman at 06/29/2009 12:02
Yeah..lack of Lan is sorta dealbreaker for someone like me who honestly couldnt give a shit about any sort of multiplayer except with my irl buddies.
Jawmuncher's Avatar
Jawmuncher at 06/29/2009 12:03
Well than looks like it will be up to the fans to find a way for lan to work.
And considering how many starcraft fanms they are they should figure something out.

Since dont you have to pay for battle.net now?
Chronic Logic's Avatar
Chronic Logic at 06/29/2009 12:05
It's a conspiracy to curb piracy I tell you! I'm not crazy!
darknil's Avatar
darknil at 06/29/2009 12:06
LAN support is good tough, most tournaments work on LAN..
Timdabrat's Avatar
Timdabrat at 06/29/2009 12:08
This is absolutely ridiculous. Do they not pay attention to anything anymore? LAN parties ALWAYS have a starcraft section. This game is going to the dogs.
Arch649's Avatar
Arch649 at 06/29/2009 12:09
Starcraft was a huge LAN staple. Fuck Blizzard.
RAB's Avatar
RAB at 06/29/2009 12:10
What the fuck. Then LAN cafes are just shit outta luck?
What about the huge LAN tournaments they have in Korea and shit?

This is a fucking stupid-ass call. They better have some good fucking reasons for this shit.
ROMaster2's Avatar
ROMaster2 at 06/29/2009 12:12
Fucking christ, even today some people don't have internet, and even still no one wants no god damn lag. Thanks Blizzard.
Lally Monkey's Avatar
Lally Monkey at 06/29/2009 12:13
I give it a month before a LAN program is out.
tsunamikitsune's Avatar
tsunamikitsune at 06/29/2009 12:16
Super lame. I just recently started to enjoy playing PC games over LAN now that I have enough friends with laptops (or the drive to bring their towers over). It's awesome because I can just install my copy of Starcraft on everybody else's computer so not everyone has to own it.

LAN also helps when the internet is down or you have a slow connection. I'd rather not have eight players on my crappy DSL connection when I could just play over LAN.
Zantetsuken's Avatar
Zantetsuken at 06/29/2009 12:19
I called it, not only are they making you pay three times for the full game Blizzard wont even include LAN.
Doomsday Forte's Avatar
Doomsday Forte at 06/29/2009 12:27
Wow, that's pretty bad as far as decisions go, especially considering how absolutely rampant the original game is. Sure, people got to play without buying the game, but they're really putting the knife to the customer's throat now.

@Jawmuncher: You never had to pay for battle.net as far as I know. Please don't tell me I'm gonna have to add "UNTIL NOW!!!" to the end of that. D:
Camui's Avatar
Camui at 06/29/2009 12:32
wtf? I think this is their way of trying to discourage people pirating the game to be honest. Since if you want to play multiplayer you can't just get hamchi or whatever that was called and go play on lan instead of B.net.

amirite?
ChronosWing's Avatar
ChronosWing at 06/29/2009 12:34
Disappointing? Yes. Deal Breaker? Not really.

The game will still kick huge amounts of ass and sell like hotcakes so I doubt Blizzard is to worried about not including LAN. Plus I give it maybe a month at the most after release before either Blizzard caves and adds LAN in a patch or someone creates a 3rd Part LAN program for it.
FinnE's Avatar
FinnE at 06/29/2009 12:38
I don't get why you as a developer would not include LAN support. Traditional knowledge of competitive gaming suggests that LAN suppport is paramount, since LAN based tournaments that pit the best players against each other are what turn a competitive game into a spectator e-sport. If there is no LAN support, there's no reason for players to travel to LAN tournaments, effectively killing the spectator side of the e-sport.
Crock23A's Avatar
Crock23A at 06/29/2009 12:48
3 letters...

D
R
M

In Warcraft III, I can share a CD with everyone at a LAN party and use the same activation codes. To get on Battle.net, everyone needs their own CD and activation key.
Havoc Fang's Avatar
Havoc Fang at 06/29/2009 12:50
Well, thats that sorted. No LAN, no Starcraft. G'Bye.
hermes's Avatar
hermes at 06/29/2009 12:53
Ok, that is a deal breaker for me. Until pirates get a hand to it...

Goooo, Pirates!!
DaedHead8's Avatar
DaedHead8 at 06/29/2009 12:54
I'm mostly worried about what this means for whenever battle.net shuts down. When that happens, if there isn't LAN support, multiplayer will be totally dead.
Shadowiii's Avatar
Shadowiii at 06/29/2009 13:02
This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. While Starcraft 1 didn't invent the LAN parties it certainly is a staple in literally EVERY SINGLE LAN PARTY I'VE EVER BEEN TO IN MY LIFE (And I've been to quite a few).
They are killing themselves here. Idiotic.
wolflive's Avatar
wolflive at 06/29/2009 13:02
Wow, with all the money going to Blizzard these days, you'd think they would come up with a way for legit copies of the game to be able to LAN.
Zantetsuken's Avatar
Zantetsuken at 06/29/2009 13:04
@Crock23A
If that's the reason why then this is a total dick move.
SunKing's Avatar
SunKing at 06/29/2009 13:10
One word: piracy.
That Guy 85's Avatar
That Guy 85 at 06/29/2009 13:10
Stupidest decision as far as I'm concerned. I was so excited about this game even though the are making it into 3 games (which is also really dumb if you ask me) but no LAN like are you trying to make people hate you or are you just dumber than sh!t? This whole no LAN thing makes me seriously consider not buying this game and just sticking to the first Starcraft. Whats next are they going to make you pay for battle.net? If that happens then you might as well just call it World of Starcraft for sh!t sakes!!1!
macbrazel's Avatar
macbrazel at 06/29/2009 13:11
Here's a petition, if you're into that sort of thing:

http://www.petitiononline.com/LANSC2/petition.html
Jawmuncher's Avatar
Jawmuncher at 06/29/2009 13:13
@Doomsday Forte

I believe the Starcraft 2 and Diablo 3 are bringing a new battle.net which requires you to pay to play online.

I could have sworn I read that somewhere.

Though it might still just be a rumor, though with activision I could see it happening since they would still make good money off of it
Mekanikles's Avatar
Mekanikles at 06/29/2009 13:15
I'm so saddened by the games industy these days. Nothing but investors and suits trying to make the most profitable product anyway possible. And if they can't deliver a good enough product that people want to buy then, sure enough, they cut their own arms off trying to fight piracy. When are we going to stop buying products from companys that loathe their clientel? What happened to just trying to deliver the best product possible? Was there ever such a thing as customers first?
Guagloves's Avatar
Guagloves at 06/29/2009 13:25
What?! I am so confused by this. Half the fun I had with Starcraft was playing with friends.
Rockvillian's Avatar
Rockvillian at 06/29/2009 13:26
I agree with Chronic Logic's conspiracy theory and continue to ring the bell of the "making internet slow on purpose and focusing everyone's attention on it in order to charge for different speeds of internet service" theory.

Just watch. It'll be like the sucky version of fireworks.
Gten's Avatar
Gten at 06/29/2009 13:28
UH wtf. As a kid the first pc game I ever played was starcraft and there was no inet in my town (1997) lan was the only way to go multyplayer. Nice way to fuckit up Blizzard..
Dexter345's Avatar
Dexter345 at 06/29/2009 13:31
This seems like sort of a silly thing not to include.
Velt's Avatar
Velt at 06/29/2009 13:35
So I will have to set up a pirate server to play the game on LAN? WTF?!?
People still like to get together and this is a game that a good laptop can handle... I see no reason for not adding it, its just a couple more lines of code.

If this is true, then is absolutely stupid.
Resonance's Avatar
Resonance at 06/29/2009 13:36
What the... in NZ where connections are slow and we pay for our damned data, allowing people at a lan party to access the internet is gonna cost money! Fuck that shit I grew up carting comps and cables to my mates garages and that shit isn't going to stop for one game needing internet. I will never pay for SC2 as long as this battle.net requirement remains. Fuck at least steam has offline mode.
Magnalon's Avatar
Magnalon at 06/29/2009 13:40
I think this is to eliminate pirated copies of the game just LANing it up.

I'm glad I'm out of college, though. We used to exclusively play LAN games, because our University blocked the bnet ports needed. That's going to suck hard for a lot of other people in that situation.
Wintersocks's Avatar
Wintersocks at 06/29/2009 13:40
"You little rascal Blizzard. That Activision boy is a bad influence. i'm calling his mother."
"But moooom"
"No buts."

On a more serious note:

[url]http://static.pyzam.com/img/funnypics/0/pyzamOmgWtf.jpg[/img]
The White Light's Avatar
The White Light at 06/29/2009 13:40
Is it really that hard to add LAN support? I just...don't understand how that could really be difficult.
Wintersocks's Avatar
Wintersocks at 06/29/2009 13:41
Jon B's Avatar
Jon B at 06/29/2009 13:42
Wait, what? How will contests have really low latency if they have to be routed through the internet?

Okay, I'll admit, it does reduce piracy by preventing multiplayer at all without a legit copy, but that's just a ridiculous measure.
Velt's Avatar
Velt at 06/29/2009 13:42
Piracy with Starcraft 2? They are going to sell millions anyway, pirates or not pirates Iam going to buy it.
I dont get it, not even piracy is a factor here.
Cowboy TTop's Avatar
Cowboy TTop at 06/29/2009 13:45
What a dick move. Why would you ditch LAN? Its not a very complex thing to set up, surely.

Perhaps this is their trick to get everyone online, so they can brag about how many users they have online. They want the stats, to please the suits and share holders, just like with WoW.

Well, should be interesting to see those S.Korean sales of Star Craft 2. It probably won't stop them, mind. This game series is like crack out there, and ActiBliz will enjoy pushing it.
Doomsday Forte's Avatar
Doomsday Forte at 06/29/2009 13:49
@Jawmuncher: Really? Man, I hope that's not true. BNet's big draw was that it was always free. And it was pretty decent as far as free service goes. Hmm...

So let me get some things straight. SC2 is split into three games, one for each race's single player mode, and you can do MP from the box with it, but only on BNet? When most people think of LAN parties, the first things that come to mind are almost always Counterstrike and StarCraft first. It's too bad they're going to really alienate the fans this way, but anything to combat piracy, I guess. *shrugs*
Archwright's Avatar
Archwright at 06/29/2009 14:04
@Timdabrat. Good news! All of your favorite LAN parties will continue to have a StarCraft section. Y'know the original StarCraft.
DigitalD562's Avatar
DigitalD562 at 06/29/2009 14:07
This move instantly alienates half of all potential SC2 players.All televised SC matches in Korea are played exclusively on LAN. Without LAN support none of the major networks/leagues will pick up SC2. Nobody is gonna take a chance on lag or dropped games on live TV with a $40,000 match on the line. This could kill the game in Korea before day one. Blizzard has a dedicated e-sports team working to make sure shit like this doesn't happen. I think I'll write an in depth blog about this later...

GG Blizzard
pedrovay2003's Avatar
pedrovay2003 at 06/29/2009 14:31
This honestly might be the deciding factor that makes me skip out on buying the game.
RWarrior1CO's Avatar
RWarrior1CO at 06/29/2009 14:37
This design decision is nearly as retarded as forcing the player to select only twelve units at a time, and they'll probably do THAT again, too.

How could such a successful company make such arbitrary and utterly stupid decisions?
killias2's Avatar
killias2 at 06/29/2009 14:39
This is ridiculous. It won't stop me from getting it, but I'm not happy at all.
Velt's Avatar
Velt at 06/29/2009 14:43
I dont know how they are going to do the GIANT LAN tournaments... of course blizzard will create a server just for them to play local but... the rest of us?
Its nonsense.
Velt's Avatar
Velt at 06/29/2009 14:45
I dont know how they are going to do the GIANT LAN tournaments... of course blizzard will create a server just for them to play local... but what about the rest of us?
mix's Avatar
mix at 06/29/2009 14:54
HAhahahah fuck this game in the face.

My buddies were stoked about this and I was going to pick it up to play along but this is shitty ass news.
mix's Avatar
mix at 06/29/2009 14:58
Should have added that creating a room online usually means bad lag especially being in Canada. Too many games with crappy Ping levels, lan games are just sweet.
prev next 50 comments

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 
New on Destructoid.TV play all videos

Loading
Loading Destructoid Videos



    Win this!
    Reminder: We're giving away six copies of Magnacarta 2!



    Dtoid Twitter    Got news?   tips@destructoid.com

    Reviews & Previews
    Mahjongg Artifacts 2 review
    Dragon Age: Origins review
    Lost Winds: The Winter of the Melodias review
    Osmos review
    Space Invaders Extreme 2 review
    Half-Minute Hero review
    JU-ON: The Grudge review
    Kenka Bancho: Badass Rumble review
    Thexder Neo review
    Domino Rally review
    more reviews
    PS3's 256-player MAG
    Rooms The Main Building
    Skate 3
    Hudson's bringing back the Bonk
    James Cameron's Avatar
    Bomberman Battlefest
    Calling
    Bad Company 2's multiplayer
    Partying like it's 1959 in BioShock 2's multiplayer
    BioShock 2 through the eyes of Big Daddy
    more previews


    - The Dtoid Army is 49489 strong -

    Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

    Call for entries: do the wrong thing
    New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide




     Originals
    Jim Sterling: Ten 'classic' games that did not age well





















    More Destructoid Originals



     Popular now more
























    Destructoid's editorial lovefest is:
    Nick Chester
    Editor-in-Chief    		 Jim Sterling
    Reviews Editor
    Dale North
    News Editor    		 Hamza Aziz
    Community Manager
    Anthony Burch
    Features Editor    		 Rey Gutierrez
    Video editor & director
    Niero
    Founder, publisher
    Letters to the editors
    tips@destructoid.com
    Associate Editors
    Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
    Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
    Brad Rice Jordan Devore
    Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
    Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
    Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
    Dyson Samit Sarkar
    Contributors
    Adam Dork
    Ben Perlee
    Daniel Lingen
    Joseph Leray    		 Joe Burling
    Mikey
    Will Maddock
    Stella Wong





     

     
      get involved

    register or login
    post a blog
    post a forum
    enter a contest
    contribute a news tip
    suggest a feature
    be a guest editor
    		 support

    new member's guide
    login assistance
    tech support
    report abuse
    email our editors
    read our dev blog
    nuclear crisis?
    		 keep in touch

    RSS feed
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Myspace
    Flickr
    Game nights
    Meetup+play online     		seriously

    about Destructoid
    advertising
    terms of use
    privacy policy
    jobs at MM
    buy our crap     		our network

    Tomopop
    Japanator
    Despingation?



    Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
    living the dream since March 16, 2006