@Pangloss

It's not just this article, taken in isolation. It's this article, taken in the context of all the other, similar articles where there's a sometimes subtle, sometimes blatant anti-Wii bias. This one just happens to be one of the more subtle ones, that's all. It's a matter of simple observation. Very rarely will you find an article on the Wii here that doesn't see fit to throw in a sometimes deserved, but usually undeserved potshot at Nintendo or the Wii in the process, no matter how "harmless" it may seem, and even if it's just in the title of the article. Here, for example, "Wii third place" instead of "PS3 fifth place". The shadow cast by Robert Summa is long, indeed.

And I'm not even talking about the cesspit of retarded comments that usually follows such an article. This particular article is rather tame by that standard, and is an exception to the rule. For instance, I have to admit that I'm actually a bit surprised that Kyousuke Nanbu hasn't popped in here yet to make his blanket "the Wii continues to fail" comment like he does in pretty much every other Wii article good or bad.