Even though the later add-ons seem more exciting, I kinda wish they held out a little longer and released them all together as one mammoth expansion - beginning with Broken Steel. These small expansions feel half-arsed and nowhere near as complete as say, Shivering Isles...
Heh Shivering Isles....Todd Howard admitted in an article I read that the team thought they bit off more than they could chew when they did Shivering Isles, and I dare say thats influenced them in the way they've structured their Fallout DLC...smaller, more focused and ultimately better.
Shivering Isles, in my view, was the only decent piece of DLC/Extra Content Oblivion got....and I basically eneded up playing Oblivion for the Achievements...and as soon as I got them...I never played it again.
Yet with Fallout, I've played it through at least 8 or 9 times...50% of th reason is im an Old School Fallout Fan who adored the originals, there other 50% is Beth have managed to keep my interest intrigued with interesting content that adds more hours and enjoyment onto subsequent playthroughs...and every month or two since January I've had a reason to go back to the game apart from being addicted..
In the end people will always prefer either Oblivion or Fallout, sometimes both. But I think the DLC Plan for Fallout was the better one.
I totally agree with you on the Oblivion/Fallout division - I've always loved fantasy RPGs and Fallout 3's bleak landscape kinda depressed me (although I do appreciate the fact it was able to create such an immersive experience). Also I'm not a huuuge combat fan - so as far as expansions go Operation Anchorage lost me.
@ Theos
Think you hit the nail on the head - exploration just doesn't appeal when you know you're pointlessly roaming a barren wasteland...which is essentially what these expansions are giving us.
That said, I still heart Fallout 3.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow