This is clearly a result of Diablo 3 using an always-online DRM option. This outrage clearly only happened because of scorned gamers who are offended that Blizzard would dare require a use of an internet connection!
Honestly never played Diablo before but assume it's sortof like Phantasy Star Online 2 just western and probably better because it's not F2P.
Blizzards whole reasoning behind requiring internet connection was to try and keep the game fair.
Oops! Guess you better head back to the PR department to come up with the next piece of shit statement fanboys can cling to.
Man, are looking for an internet comment fight or something? It seems that way, or you wouldn't have posted again after nobody took your bait the first and then yet again trying to bait me!
Relax. As I said, we get it. Everytime there is a post even remotely critical of any developer or publisher you rush in to either defend said developer/publisher or to show us how silly it is to get worked up over silly videogames.
You are a mature guy who isn't fazed by pointless videogame stuff. We got that. You don't need to reinforce that point all the time.
"This is literally the most hilarious !@#$ in the world."
"blizzard at doing them best WOOT
just imcompetent as usual, damn you blizzard.. fix that !@#$ fast and the issue with the trading window.... %^-*ing disgrace for every human on the planet"
"guess blizzards so busy sucking balls^^ instead of fixing ecploits and the damn trading window issue"
...Never link to the Blizzard forums again, Jim. I think I just lost a few IQ points from scanning through that.
Fixed that for ya tristy.
I haven't noticed any particular behaviour by him, I don't make a point of noting who says what, particularly. All I can say is he's right in this case. This article is basically saying that there is an exploit in a PC game, which is like the American news headlining an item saying that it's sunny in Spain today.
SICK BURN!!!!!! (/end sarcasm about said burning)
I haven't ever played Diablo 3, but I've heard enough to know that if you die on hardcore mode you lose that character. After putting that much time and effort into the game to get a character to level 51, CaimDark has the right to get angry with Blizzard for having such an exploit in a game with such an unforgiving system.
Now if you go to an article about that topic and leave a shitty comment dissing the importance of their problem then you should expect to get an equally shitty as well as angry response back. Basically if you don't want to get dragged into an internet comments fight the don't stir the pot in the first place.
also anyone bringing up the always online.
they're called brains, use them.
Can we start a betting pool on what the next cock up is going to be? My money's on a bug that causes the data saved related to the RMAH to get wiped. Oh, that'd be a fun one.
so remember, whenever a game breaks, or bugs out, or glitches against you or doesn't work as intended or advertised, it's cool because... you know...
wait, why are you people cool with that again?
You are a magnificently hilarious bastard. We get that. You need to keep reinforcing that point all the time and make me spit out my morning coffee every time you post.
Remember the days when you could often put in a game to play, and it was fully finished without needing numerous patches post-release, weekly hotfixes, and title updates?
Remember when playing games used to be more about playing the game instead of lamenting a shoddy product all dressed up in marketing?
Man, I'm old.
My bad man. I'll PM you from here on out and make sure it's ok with you before I comment. Sorry.
what's with all this "I don't take videogame seriously" attitude? we all obviously do, if not, we wouldn't be commenting so much here.
Sort of comforting to see that some things never change.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow



























follow











