games  anime  |  toys
Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


New book details how Microsoft used Sony's Cell processor for the Xbox 360 photo

David Shippy and Mickie Phipps’ new book “The Race for a New Game Machine” has all the videogames industry drama that a person could ask for. The Wall Street Journal recently put up a tight synopsis of the book, detailing how Microsoft was able to nab fundamental specifications for the Cell and have their own chip created around them for the Xbox 360.

According to the book, Sony decided that the Playstation 3 needed to have a brand new processor, unlike anything their previous consoles featured before. In 2001, a partnership was formed between Sony, Toshiba, and IBM to create the chip from scratch. In 2002, Microsoft (looking to build the 360) went to IBM, saw some of the key specs for the unreleased Cell, and contracted IBM to build a processor around those specifications to put into the 360.

The kicker is that Microsoft ended up winning the time war, without having to spend the R&D money that Sony did. Because of a manufacturing error with the first round of chips that Microsoft protected itself against, they were able to release their console in 2005 – Sony’s original target year.

This book doesn’t have spies, ninjas, Master Chief, or pictures of cats in precarious positions with hilariously misspelled captions to explain the predicament. It does have an awesome story to tell, though.


Continue: More Microsoft stories





prev next

41 comments | showing # 1 to 41

dprime's Avatar
dprime at 01/01/2009 21:18
Bill Gates uses puppies for fuel and eats hamburgers with children's tears as dressing.
Wedge's Avatar
Wedge at 01/01/2009 21:24
Lolwat? Last I checked the 360 primarily used modified G5 cores from the last generation of non Intel Macs. I can still remember the early development units that were inside Mac cases.
Jon2309's Avatar
Jon2309 at 01/01/2009 21:28
My xbox plays games. I like that. :)
Shirley Temple's Avatar
Shirley Temple at 01/01/2009 21:29
@Wedge:

Are those the same processors that were the main reason gaming on a mac sucked?
darkwhitehair's Avatar
darkwhitehair at 01/01/2009 21:33
ohh Microsoft steals everything... blar blahr blar... hardy hoo *insert RROD joke*... blarty blar... Microsoft is MicroSHAFT... blarty har har...

Sony is gawd... blarty blar har... LIVE is filled with newbs... blar blar...

cant we all just get along??
dprime's Avatar
dprime at 01/01/2009 21:34
Maybe if the PS3 stole the 360's gaming library everything would be fair.
-PL-'s Avatar
-PL- at 01/01/2009 21:45
I guess microsoft forgot to steal the heatsink designs from the PS3.
Tubatic's Avatar
Tubatic at 01/01/2009 21:46
Weird, you'd think the blogosphere would have heard about that sort of thing by now.
MrTaco's Avatar
MrTaco at 01/01/2009 21:50
This just seems like fanboyism to new extremes...hah
Nicholie's Avatar
Nicholie at 01/01/2009 21:54
@Wedge

Troll. But in case you're being serious... the processor in the 360 is a triple core, making it impossible to be an old Mac processor. Now some of the tech that went into it may be IBM's PowerPC architecture (which would explain why its so easy to develop for) but hardly the old G5 models.
Velt's Avatar
Velt at 01/01/2009 21:59
and that my boy (*book closeing*), is how you make a perfect RRoD.
atomicow's Avatar
atomicow at 01/01/2009 22:00
atomicow's Avatar
atomicow at 01/01/2009 22:03
The 360 CPU is indeed based on the power of architecture, which is VASTLY different from Cell. Early 360 dev units were nothing more than powermac G5s.
SnakeDude4Life's Avatar
SnakeDude4Life at 01/01/2009 22:09
Snape kills Snake.

Kratos IS Keyser Söze.

Nariko has a dong.(Sleep Away Camp FTW)
Joe Burling's Avatar
Joe Burling at 01/01/2009 22:18
So far, I haven't seen the PS3 or 360 play a game that looks significantly better than its competitor, but there is a very obvious difference between the specs of the 360's CPU and the Cell in the PS3. Despite this, the differences are much smaller than that of the original Xbox and the PS2 (in which case the Xbox > PS2 in terms of specs and capabilities).

What I'm trying to say is, Sony and MS took very different hardware approaches to achieve games that look more or less the exact same.
Furyfire's Avatar
Furyfire at 01/01/2009 22:37
Interesting anyways. Might have to read this book.. then wonder why we still have Red Rings. o_o
Xhumation's Avatar
Xhumation at 01/01/2009 23:58
Interesting. sounds like a good read.
gamadaya's Avatar
gamadaya at 01/02/2009 00:09
MS pwns hard when it comes to 2 things: buying people out, and stealing company secrets. That's why they are so successful. I find it funny though that Sony and MS spent so much time trying to get the upper hand over one another, but in the end Nintendo beat them hands down without even trying to be a direct competitor. Weird how things work that way.
dprime's Avatar
dprime at 01/02/2009 01:37
Last comment: Can you even name one subsidiary Microsoft obtained from a buy out? Do you know anything about business? Or is this just typical pop financial Microsoft hate?

People hate Microsoft for the same reason they hate the United States. They're number one.
Beyerah's Avatar
Beyerah at 01/02/2009 01:41
Big steaming pile.

http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/cpu/xbox360-2.ars/2
The first image shows the layout of the Xenon, Three PPC derived cores all lined up next to one another to do the grunt work.

http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/cpu/cell-2.ars
Again, the first image shows the layout of the Cell, One PPC derived core, controlling 8 Cell SPE's. The PPC is there to split up tasks, the SPEs Do the grunt work. Gives the ps3 immense floating point ability.

They are very different beasts.

The 6 week delay in sampling pushing sony back a full year? Steaming, again. MS sent out mac G5's as early devkits before they got their hands on xenon, Sony had to wait for cell before they could do the same. MS knew they needed a GPU from the start and ATi delivered their next gen (at the time) part for the 360 a year before they relased the same tech for the PC. Sony thought the cell would be powerful enough that they wouldn't need a GPU, when it became clear that it wasn't going to happen they had to tack an NVidia GPU into the PS3 halfway through development. There's your year long delay.
Developers have treated the ps3 and 360 the same, a cpu and a gpu, one crunches, one draws. And get very similar looking games.
mistic's Avatar
mistic at 01/02/2009 01:44
So in fact M$ are bigger pirates then us? ( I know they used to be, thanks to that movie "Pirates of Sylicon Valley" ) but that it still was this bad? no idea :-)

guess I'll go look for a pdf of this :-)
pedrovay2003's Avatar
pedrovay2003 at 01/02/2009 02:09
I love how all the 360 fanboys come out of the woodwork and bash the PS3's supposedly "bad" library when something negative is said about the 360.

At least we can play our games.
garison's Avatar
garison at 01/02/2009 02:31
I might actually once again delve again into the world of paper books, since the internet, I haven't read one book. I know.
Stephen57's Avatar
Stephen57 at 01/02/2009 02:36
Haha, consoles. I ply my games on a gaming desktop powered by uranium and moonbeams.
Wexx's Avatar
Wexx at 01/02/2009 04:02
Huh. I still think I'd rather read Raising the Bar.
Druid 01's Avatar
Druid 01 at 01/02/2009 05:44
lol @ corporations not patenting their tech securely enough, or properly protecting their IPs is always entertaining.
Bans's Avatar
Bans at 01/02/2009 06:06
http://news.cnet.com/2100-1043-5706658.html

It's based G5 CPU, how is it even accurate?
Demtor's Avatar
Demtor at 01/02/2009 09:01
I haven't the slightest clue how business operates on that level but I'd imagine Sony should have found a way to 'lock that shit down,' as they say. Microsoft is just doing what good competitors do in a free market. Probably not very ethical, but since when has that ever bothered them?
parrothead's Avatar
parrothead at 01/02/2009 10:08
Bill Gates stole and idea and made a bunch of money off of it. That has never happened before. Oh wait Steve Jobs just called me to tell me that I was wrong about that.
John B's Avatar
John B at 01/02/2009 10:26
Actually, the guy who invented CP/M called back even earlier than Steve Jobs. IBM is also on hold with a similar claim that predates Apple. And so is Lotus, Borland, WordPerfect, WordStar...

Microsoft started to steal software l-o-n-g before Apple and is one of the primary reasons why the word "innovation" means jack shit any more.
DarkSunDS's Avatar
DarkSunDS at 01/02/2009 10:40
Bah, I'm tired of fanboy hate. To sum it up, Nintendo is for kids, Microsoft steals everything, Sony has no games.

Now can we be a bit more positive and consider that the Wii has good M-rated games like No More Heroes, that Microsoft has original content and good exclusive games, and that Sony is the most powerful console, a Blu-Ray player, and has LittleBigPlanet and Metal Gear Solid 4, as well as many non-exclusives like Rock Band and Grand Theft Auto 4?

But to remain on topic, it sucks for Sony. If they had launched the PS3 in 2005, I'm sure the console would have been a lot more successful.
John B's Avatar
John B at 01/02/2009 10:54
can we be a bit more positive and consider that the Wii has good M-rated games like No More Heroes

That right there kills your wish. Positive statements about the Wii are not allowed on DToid. Don't you know that by now?

I'm not sure that it would have worked for Sony in 2005, though. There would have been even fewer HD TV owners than in 2006, and HD whether gaming or watching Blu-ray is really what pushes the PS3 over the PS2. The problem is that Sony pushed the PS3 as the perfect HD media solution while ignoring the fact that (A) they were just incredibly overpriced and (B) people need to add a minimum of $1,000 (back in 2005) to get a decent HD TV.

I understand where you're going with that, but honestly I don't think that it would have helped nearly as much as you think because of the additional expenditure to play the PS3 in full glory.
Holyetheline's Avatar
Holyetheline at 01/02/2009 11:04
I'd read it if I had it.
Primo's Avatar
Primo at 01/02/2009 11:43
Whether any of it is true or not, I definitely want to read it.
flabzilla's Avatar
flabzilla at 01/02/2009 12:06
Remember the hype around the "Emotion Chip" lol.
I haven't seen anything special the PS3's Cell processor can achieve.

So far it seems it was all hype over nothing.
dollrapist's Avatar
dollrapist at 01/02/2009 12:40
The innards of my game systems could be cat gut, and I wouldn't blink an eye. It doesn't fucking matter, and I don't give a fuck. I play all systems and don't have any silly or immature fanboy cheer or defense for any of them.
Corak's Avatar
Corak at 01/02/2009 13:27
Bill Gates beating other companies to market since...umm...forever. Hate on the man all you like he's a marketing genius. He makes arguably inferior products/software but he knows how to market it well.
Orionsaint's Avatar
Orionsaint at 01/02/2009 13:30
I always hoped that they'd release Tekken Dark Resurrection for Xbox Live. I wouldn't be surprised since Tekken 6 is coming to 360. After all, Soul Calibur 1 was released on XBL in honor of Soul Calibur IV coming to 360. It's also from NAMCO.
brainderailment's Avatar
brainderailment at 01/02/2009 14:05
This book isn't about Microsoft stealing Cell specs from sony as much as it's about IBM making processors for both companies and having an inner struggle to keep things separate.
MrNiceguy's Avatar
MrNiceguy at 01/02/2009 20:51
AYEEEE MATEY! LIVIN DA LIFE OF THE PIRATES~! THE GOLDEN AGE ISN'T OVER! PIRATES WILL LIVE ON FOREVERRRRR!
downsouthhustla's Avatar
downsouthhustla at 01/03/2009 15:45
dollrapist at 01/02/2009 12:40

"The innards of my game systems could be cat gut, and I wouldn't blink an eye. It doesn't fucking matter, and I don't give a fuck. I play all systems and don't have any silly or immature fanboy cheer or defense for any of them."

This gripes my balls equal to if not more than rampant fanboyism.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 
New on Destructoid.TV play all videos

Loading
Loading Destructoid Videos




    Win this!
    Reminder: We're giving away six copies of Magnacarta 2!



    Dtoid Twitter    Got news?   tips@destructoid.com

    Reviews & Previews
    Mahjongg Artifacts 2 review
    Dragon Age: Origins review
    Lost Winds: The Winter of the Melodias review
    Osmos review
    Space Invaders Extreme 2 review
    Half-Minute Hero review
    JU-ON: The Grudge review
    Kenka Bancho: Badass Rumble review
    Thexder Neo review
    Domino Rally review
    more reviews
    PS3's 256-player MAG
    Rooms The Main Building
    Skate 3
    Hudson's bringing back the Bonk
    James Cameron's Avatar
    Bomberman Battlefest
    Calling
    Bad Company 2's multiplayer
    Partying like it's 1959 in BioShock 2's multiplayer
    BioShock 2 through the eyes of Big Daddy
    more previews


    - The Dtoid Army is 49515 strong -

    Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

    Call for entries: do the wrong thing

    New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide




     Originals
    Jim Sterling: Ten 'classic' games that did not age well





















    More Destructoid Originals




     Popular now more
























    Destructoid's editorial lovefest is:
    Nick Chester
    Editor-in-Chief
    Jim Sterling
    Reviews Editor
    Dale North
    News Editor
    Hamza Aziz
    Community Manager
    Anthony Burch
    Features Editor
    Rey Gutierrez
    Video editor & director
    Niero
    Founder, publisher
    Letters to the editors
    tips@destructoid.com
    Associate Editors
    Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
    Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
    Brad Rice Jordan Devore
    Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
    Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
    Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
    Dyson Samit Sarkar
    Contributors
    Adam Dork
    Ben Perlee
    Daniel Lingen
    Joseph Leray
    Joe Burling
    Mikey
    Will Maddock
    Stella Wong





     

     
      get involved

    register or login
    post a blog
    post a forum
    enter a contest
    contribute a news tip
    suggest a feature
    be a guest editor
    support

    new member's guide
    login assistance
    tech support
    report abuse
    email our editors
    read our dev blog
    nuclear crisis?
    keep in touch

    RSS feed
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Myspace
    Flickr
    Game nights
    Meetup+play online
    seriously

    about Destructoid
    advertising
    terms of use
    privacy policy
    jobs at MM
    buy our crap
    our network

    Tomopop
    Japanator
    Despingation?




    Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
    living the dream since March 16, 2006