Destructoid is a gaming discussion community updated nearly every 20 minutes by a tight-knit group of independent dirty uncles. Get involved by creating an avatar to post comments, upload videos, create your own blog, and meet new people that love gaming.   Returning Dtoider? login!
latest posts daily recapnew releases deals features reviews podcasts videos contests  
 previews
Retro Game Challenge, Big Bang Mini, and more
Stoked
50 Cent: Blood on the Sand
The Godfather II multiplayer
The Godfather II
more previews


 reviews
Word Soup
Crayon Physics Deluxe
KamiCrazy
Tatsunoko Vs Capcom
Crystal Defenders (iPhone)
more reviews


 podcasts

Podtoid 82: The Internet: making cannibalism easier with Rev Anthony

RetroforceGO! Episode 74: Great retro boss battles with Chad Concelmo

The Podcastle 25: I can't remember what we talked about with Jim Sterling

More shows from the Gamercast Network

back episodes & iTunes info




 team
Nick Chester
Editor-in-Chief
Dale North
News Editor
Anthony Burch
Features Editor
Jim Sterling
Reviews Editor
Hamza Aziz
Community Manager
Niero
Founder/Webmonkey
editors
Ashley Davis
Brad Nicholson
Brad Rice
Chad Concelmo
Colette Bennett
Conrad Zimmerman
Daniel Lingen
Dyson
Jonathan Holmes
Jonathan Ross
Jordan Devore
Joseph Leray
Tom Fronczak
Topher Cantler
Samit Sarkar
contributors
Adam Dork
Ben Perlee
Charlie Suh
Joe Burling
Justin Villasenor
Mike Ferry
Mikey
Will Maddock

Living the dream
ModernMethod


1:04 PM on 04.10.2008

173 comments

N'Gai Croal comments on RE5 trailer, but all we see is another Capcom hit

Gameboi on Antiquated Racism

N'Gai Croal comments on RE5 trailer, but all we see is another Capcom hit screenshot

During a recent interview with MTV Multiplayer (concerning the depiction of blacks in games), N'Gai Croal of Newsweek gave an enlightening talk about the controversy behind the Resident Evil 5 trailer, and how Capcom could have done things to avoid the unnecessary fuss.

According to Croal, it was just a few moments in when he realized that there were some things about the trailer that had the potential to inflame members of the black community, however unintentional it might have been. While the majority of us were fawning over the detailed images and dynamic lighting -- not to mention getting all antsy about the debut of a new Resident Evil game on next-generation hardware since RE4 righted the series again -- others were seeing something starkly different. To them, the trailer contained just over three minutes of classic racist imagery that many Caucasians (including myself) never even noticed:

More on this, after the jump: 

"There was stuff like even before the point in the trailer where the crowd turned into zombies. There sort of being, in sort of post-modern parlance, they’re sort of “othered.” They’re hidden in shadows, you can barely see their eyes, and the perspective of the trailer is not even someone who’s coming to help the people. It’s like they’re all dangerous; they all need to be killed. It’s not even like one cute African — or Haitian or Caribbean — child could be saved. They’re all dangerous men, women and children. They all have to be killed."

Croal then goes on to touch upon Resident Evil 4, and that even though the zombies (yes, I know they were supposedly not zombies in that game) were obviously non-white, a fair comparison cannot be made, considering the historical American race relations of the past:

"And given the history, given the not so distant post-colonial history, you would say to yourself, why would you uncritically put up those images? It’s not as simple as saying, “Oh, they shot Spanish zombies in ‘Resident Evil 4,’ and now ‘black zombies and that’s why people are getting upset.” The imagery is not the same. It doesn’t carry the same history, it doesn’t carry the same weight. I don’t know how to explain it more clearly than that."

Still not sold yet on the idea that the trailer wasn't exactly thought out and planned as well as it could have been? Croal expands upon the effect imagery has on the larger audience when some historical context is brought into play:

"It’s like when you engage that kind of imagery you have to be careful with it. It would be like saying you were going to do some sort of zombie movie that appeared to be set in Europe in the 1940’s with skinny, emaciated, Hasidic-looking people. If you put up that imagery people would be saying, “Are you crazy?” Well, that’s what this stuff looks like. This imagery has a history. It has a history and you can’t pretend otherwise. That imagery still has a history that has to be engaged, that has to be understood. If you’re going to tread, if you’re going to engage imagery that has that potential, the onus is on the creator to be aware of that because there will be repercussions in the marketplace."

He finishes up by saying that he doesn't know for sure how Capcom views the whole situation, and the potential ramifications of the game's eventual release. Will it hurt the franchise? In the past, some retailers have tended to shy away from titles that might cause them to be viewed in the wrong way. You know, the image thing Croal's been referring to throughout the entire interview.

Contrary to the ebony-helmeted icon that I've chosen to represent myself here at Destructoid, I'm not of African-American descent. As a result, I may not be as finely tuned into the black community, as say, an African-American would be. However, I find it absurd to think that a Japanese publisher would set out to purposely (or even accidentally) conjure up negative racial overtones towards blacks while publicizing their next game.

Equally puzzling is Croal's mention of WWII-era Jews as a possible analogy. Although I can appreciate the point he is trying to make, there really aren't any parallels that one can draw from such a comparison. What does this really have to do with historical imagery of blacks in America? 

Capcom has but two goals with Resident Evil 5: to weave a story that is true to the RE lore, and to make a profit at the end of the day. By nature of most shooters, it's going to be one man taking on many. In this case, Chris Redfield (who is white) just so happens to be taking on zombie-fied villagers that are black. I have yet to get my hands on the finished game, but judging by the trailer alone, there is nothing about it that overtly depicts the African-American community in a negative manner.

Go back and view the trailer one more time, and then decide for yourself if you see anything worth commenting about (other than the game itself) on a social level. Are there any villagers that seem to be pigeonholed into a stereotypical view that screams out to you in a way that says, "Aha! That is obviously aimed at denigrating blacks!"?

No, you won't find that. What you will find is a stunning trailer for a highly anticipated game, which just happens to take place in an area where non-white villagers are under the influence of something evil -- and it might lead back to a shady corporation that goes by the name of Umbrella. To think otherwise would just be reaching out and grasping at straws in order to back up an argument that shouldn't even exist in the first place. What do you think?


173 comments   |   latest by SlyKill
AML-- Let's all never do anything to offend anyone. Let's never use any words or images that might conjure up any bad feelings that we have ever had. Pan's Labyrinth was about evil men raping ...... read more


 

RELATED ARTICLES

Is Prince of Persia culturally insensitive?
102 comments

MS starts racial profiling, claims Hispanics like home entertainment best
40 comments

Georgia to give tax breaks to game devs
37 comments

WoW discrimination at the workplace? MMO fans need not apply
35 comments

Destructoid Rewind:<BR>Our biggest stories from Feb 4-10, 2007
29 comments



 community blogs  (32196 Dtoiders!)
p