It'll help if it's Old Snake or Naked Snake instead.
Including Snake isn't a problem, especially considering his iconic status on the Playstations, comparatively.
a lot of iconic playstation franchises aren't actually playstation-exclusive anymore (crash, tomb raider, final fantasy, etc.), and sony would be doing themselves a huge disfavor by ignoring them on that basis alone.
you could argue that brawl has an unbalanced amount of "cartoony characters with white gloves"--for god's sake, one of the characters is literally just a white glove. but so what? that'd be a moot point because the characters have different and unique enough movesets to create a fantastic fighting game. i don't see what the difference is here.
if it's just the aesthetics of it that turn you off, that's fair enough--but the way you're phrasing it makes it seem like it would make for a weaker game, when it's just a game that caters to different tastes.
unless of course you have as big an issue with brawl as you do with this, in which case maybe crossover fighters just aren't your thing.
If only that was true, for your argument's sake. Too bad its not, but hey, anything to hate on the game is fair game I guess.
Nothing surprising, but still cool to have a semi-confirmation. Oh, and please leave it at Cole and Drake. No one else from those series is worth putting in these games. Except for maybe The Beast as a secret character. Though I haven't played the sequel, so idk if that game would make that canonically illogical.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow

























follow












