
I gotta say, I was more than impressed with the amount of submissions we received for the first installment of Monthly Musings. We received some incredibly intelligent submissions which provoked genuine debate, and nobody even posted any pictures of their penises. For the most part. But that's the past -- another month, another Monthly Musings topic, another opportunity to get your work featured on the front page.
This month, the topic is "...And the gamers who play them," focusing on videogame subcultures, cliques and clans. We all love videogames, but some of us show that love in different ways than others. Your job for this month is to analyze the videogame subcultures which mean the most to you, good or bad.
Want to hold up die-hard Smash Bros fans as the epitome of what competitive gamers should be ("no items, Final D only")? Go right ahead. Feel like making fun of LARPers, but in a logical, scientific way? Be my guest. Feel like defending Halo and Madden fans? It's your choice.
Hit the jump for a further discussion of the theme.
I must stress, that this month's topic is not an excuse to just bash a random group of gamers without rhyme, reason, or support. I can quite easily say that all furries are terrifying and should be neutered, but why? I haven't supported my argument and I haven't made any real point.
Furthermore, you shouldn't feel pressured to just rant and bitch about subcultures. Why not point out some gaming groups that you love? We've all heard thousands of rants and cynical complaints about most subsections of the gamer elite -- it's rare nowadays to hear some legitimately positive, hopeful, and (dare I say it?) happy discussion on a game subculture. Yeah, everyone hates XBox Live gamers; why not talk about die-hard adventure game fans instead? Positivity is unusual, and therefore sexy.
Literally any game-related subculture is up for grabs, here. Religious anti-game legislators, 8-bit artists, competitive gamers, whatever. If you're going to write on the fanbase of a single game -- let's say you're going to take the easy route and attack Halo fans -- then be sure you comment on the gamers themselves, not the game they play. If you were to denounce Halo fans as shallow gamers, don't spend six paragraphs just talking about how much of a letdown Halo 3 was (though that can certainly be a part of your argument). It's "...and the gamers who play them," not "...and the games they play."
As always, you can make your post anytime within the month of March; just be sure to title your cblog "And the gamers who play them: Blah blah blah."
Just like last month, the most interesting articles which spark the most debate will be promoted to the Dtoid front page.
Any questions? Feel free to hit the comments.
Tourneyfag bashing. This should be interesting.
I call dibs on the shmup article by the way.
Ooooo...this sounds a bit tougher than the last musing. I look forward to it.
at least the picture will be right about 30 days in a month for next months musings...
"I can quite easily say that all furries are terrifying and should be neutered"
That both made me laugh and cry T_T
Interesting topic, but I have a couple of concerns. First, this could potentially create some serious flamebait. Second, the serious flamebait will most likely be the posts that generate the most conversation. Want to get some comments? Flame an entire group of people. Want to write a logical, well-thought out post that praises a group of people? Don't be surprised when you get ignored.
I think this month's promoted articles should be based on the quality of the writing instead of the conversation it generates. Once it hits the front page, any piece of quality writing will generate discussion.
I think that should really be the standard for any of the promoted pieces Panda. Though with other topics it may be more likely that good writing generates ocnversation and here any writing can do it as long as it's flamebait.
Yeah, I definitely think the quality of writing is always going to be a factor, but I'm under the impression that the conversation a piece generates is equally important (i.e. you must have both to be promoted). I just hope this topic will have well-written positive pieces as well as well-written flamebait.
I think if we Dtoiders really tried hard not to feed the trolls (who will be fairly obvious this month) we will see only the best articles promoted.
I can see this topic turning out highly fucked up :)
Nice idea. Kind of challenging, but should turn up a couple really good reads. Looking forward to it.
flame bait ahoy
Panda-I agree. Sometimes I've been frustrated as an admittedly oft-inactive c-blogger because I would write something I was pretty proud of, almost always in an attempt to persuade or make some kind of point, and only get several comments that compliment what I said, with no real detractors to be found. Sometimes it seems like you have to go off the deep end and make some really ridiculous and/or exaggerated assertions to get some dissenting views in the comments. But I'll give this one a shot, probably sooner than later since my theme will be one that more than one person will probably write about...
This gives me an idea. I might head over to the local LAN centre and have a chat with peeps to get some material.
Trumpets
I already have an idea to write about, but it'll be awhile before I get it out there. Busy busy this week.
Alright. I just might make a submission for this one, but I have to hammer it out in my head before I write anything.
I have several ideas for this, as I tend to play games that fall right into this kind of niche category. Expect multiple such posts from me.
Ahhh what about those cats that play licenced games I know a few.
I have a more solid idea than last month, so expect at least once!
Cause the fanboys will be out in force to defend there spot of being right in there own little world