Nintendo's exercise game Wii Fit has sold over 2 million copies in Japan. I can only guess that this success is due to the already fit (well, more fit than us) nation's desire to be even more healthy. But it seems that Mario creator Shigeru Miyamoto feels that the success might be due to its design as a family game. And, as American families aren't necessarily known for their cohesiveness, Miyamoto is worried about the title's success here.
When CNET's Crave asked Miyamoto what he expected the American response to this game would be, he expressed concern over our high divorce rate.
Miyamoto noted that on average, American families are apart more often than those in Japan. A lot of families have parents who have separated or divorced, so it's tougher to predict the role family will play in the American response to Wii Fit.
Personally, I don't see what a gamer's family situation has to do with game acceptance. Only one person can play most of the Wii Fit games on the board at one time, right? If anything, I'd place more worry on our lazy American lifestyle. Dysfunctional family or not, we don't like to get off the couch!
The CNET article also mentions some kind of possible interaction between the DS and Wii Fit. We could see a fitness tracker or calorie counter in the future. Miyamoto also hints at the possibility of a new Pikmin game. I'd take some new Olimar action over exercise any day!
What do you think? Will America accept Wii Fit? Or will they join me in couch-based plant-animal strategy action?
Dale North is Destructoid's Editor-In-Chief, a founding editor, and specialist in Japanese gaming. An accomplished musician, Dale was reporting from Japan during the earthquakes of 2011. Luckily, he got the fuck out alive and is home in America now with his wife and beloved corgi, Einstein. Dale is also a co-founder of Destructoid's sister anime site
Japanator. Likes Corgis, Sega Saturn, PSP, iPhone, Photographic tools.
Meet the rest of the team
| BBcode help |
| [b]Bold text[/b] |
Bold text |
| [i]Italic text[/i] |
Italic text |
| [url]http://www.dtoid.com/[/url] |
http://www.dtoid.com |
| [url=http://www.dtoid.com/]Web link[/url] |
Web link |
| [img]http://www.example.com/robot.jpg[/img] |
 |
Post a comment! You can also post a photo below:
Comment with Facebook
Click connect and comment instantly!
|
Comment with Dtoid
New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds
|
46 comments | showing # 1 to 46
|
Comment with Facebook
Click connect and comment instantly!
|
Comment with Dtoid
New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds
|
Comments policy
Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?
Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!
In unrelated news, birds are attempting to build a nest in my window. I've repelled numerous assaults, but they just keep coming.
That said, expecting the American "casual" audience to buy a lot of software is still a completely retarded pipe dream.
i for one will be picking it up at launch. my mom thinks it looks cool and me n' my dad are pre-ordering it for her for mothers day. say what you will about the wii but nintendo achieved what it wanted with it. to appeal to even non-gamers, my mom who hasn't touched a video game since mario bros for NES has actually enjoyed the wii quite a bit, she usually pesters my dad for afew rounds of golf on wii sports every wii-kend. haha see what i did there?
but hell, if DDR can get obese kids playing for fun or losing weight, I don't see how this couldn't do the same. Just as long as that board doesn't break on hugely obese kids. I'm not getting it but my dad plans to. So i'll just sucker off him when he's not playing it.
wii fit looked boring during that wii snooze fest of a press confrenece so i do not want. i agree with epic, why make games for a system taking two steps back as far as technological progression goes. and if ya wanna lose weight change yr eating habits. jus jog every once and a while. you dont even need a gym membership for that.
/end of rant.
I do disagree with many who say that, simply because it's a peripheral, it is automatically a gimmick. I really don't understand that way of thinking. I mean, how are you defining gimmick? Is it because it does something different and they, in turn, are advertising that it does something different? That's what a peripheral is, right? So that doesn't make any sense to me.
I understand that it's made for a niche group, but so is Harvest Moon, and I wouldn't call that a gimmick. I don't see the DS as a gimmick and it did all kinds of new things and was advertised accordingly. I mean, by all means, if you feel the need, call it a gimmick – I just don't see it that way. Maybe it's perspective. Or maybe it's just another thing that gamers do in large groups to be MOUNTAIN DEW HARDCORE!!!! and separates themselves from nongamers?
And then the fitness club industry will complain that Wii Fit is driving them out of business, a la the movie industry complaining about video games.
Being a fat American, I plan on getting one. And inviting my fat American friends over to play.
I'm with you. Well except for the treadmill part. They're the devil and only worthwhile if it's absolutely freezing outside and there's no snow. Actually I'd rather have wii fit over a treadmill
Depends on your physical need and the environment in which you live (I don't see how some people actually like running in downtown DC with all the roads and traffic lights). But, my treadmill is available all the time, has a great hill exercise routine, goes up to 12 MPH, and has a built-in TV screen that happens to be hooked up to my PS2 Slim. I don't play games on it, but I do watch DVDs while I run.
For example: unless you're already mostly in shape or have a very specific body type, jogging/running will likely do more harm than anything, especially if you do it when not on a specially prepared track. You'll probably do horrible damage to your knees in the long run, and you probably won't be able to keep it up long enough to burn anything substantial unless you're already somewhat in shape.
Not only are they completely different areas (Wii Fit is more like buying a Tae Bo videotape or Yoga tape, etc)...but well, nobody says you can't do more than one type of exercise?
That's fairly ignorant. The chances of causing damage to your knees is increased, but it pales in comparison to the chances of what happens to you by not exercising. There are safer exercise routines, such as elliptical runners and bikes, but running is still the one thing you can do pretty much anywhere and without any additional machines.
And I wonder what your definition of 'somewhat in shape' is since I started running two months ago weighing in at just over 220 pounds and running for 15-20 minutes at speeds slower than 5mph and now weigh 205 without any injuries whatsoever and I am now able to run at faster speeds for longer than half an hour (though I keep it to half an hour).
it has to do with Japanese mannerisms, where if the thing you want to say is negative, you play it down as much as possible without actually saying the negative thing.. for example: you ask a japanese company to do something and they say it will be "very difficult" to accomplish, when they really mean "no way in hell.".
that's that behavior in action, and it got Dale confused in a very predictably westerner way. what Miyamoto is saying, without saying, is that he's worried it won't sell because americans are lazy.
For instance, I did cardio workouts for well over a year and got absolutely nothing out of it; within weeks of stating an isometric routine my belt was looser and I had significantly more muscle mass. But that same routine probably won't work for you.
As another example, I had a college Professor who managed to lose almost 20 lbs of fat because he switched to a manual lawnmower over a riding one. That was literally the only change he made in his weekly routine and he really shaped up.
I never suggested that people not exercise; that's obviously the worst choice. What I suggested was that having people randomly throw out advice that will probably hurt the majority of people listening to it is bad. As bad as assuming Wii Fit will actually by itself help you lose any weight because "Fit" is in the title.
It's not just about "having weak knees", it's about not having proper running posture, having the wrong body type, and tons of other factors.
No, Miyamoto... I don't think you have to worry about it because of the divorce rate here. I think you have to worry about that game having craptacular sales because there are likely less fools in the US that are willing to buy a product *THAT DOES NOTHING* for $90 when you can buy Guitar Hero III for the same price *AND ACTUALLY HAVE FUN*.
You're one of the ones who responds to jogging, but not everyone will get those same results from that routine.
Everyone who properly exercises and diets will achieve a healthy status over a prolonged period. Now, they may not obtain the muscle mass build that they want or the removal of all body fat, but they will be healthy with the increased cardiovascular workout and the reduced weight. There are rare instances of people having genetic issues that make it extremely hard to lose fat, of course.
Some people will end up hurting themselves, some people won't lose anything, etc.
The only people who won't lose anything are those who don't need to lose anything. And, as was my point above, the percentage of people who will injure themselves, let alone at a level that would disable them in some way at later years, pales greatly in comparison to the percentage of people who will injure themselves due to obesity and other health risks from not exercising.
What I suggested was that having people randomly throw out advice that will probably hurt the majority of people listening to it is bad.
Yes, because the epidemic of people disabling themselves from running is so great in today's age. Right up there with heart disease, diabetes, and cancer...
You go into any gym and tell them you want to lose weight and they'll all say the same thing: If you just want to lose weight, go running. But, if you want to shape and build muscle while and after having burned off fat, then you'll need an exercise plan.
Anyway, enough of this off-topic mayhem.
I think it was already said this isn't meant for actual exercise.. but that's my understanding. It's about the interaction. For the people who are whining and bitching that this do any thing -- that's what some people thought of guitar heroes and ddr. You get to pretend you're doing something -- but it was fun, like pretending you're some super soldier.
And i suppose it's understandable soemone is worry about a family's structure.. when they build a console for the family..
Exacto-mundo!! Distance running can serve its purpose for the die-hard, and I'll admit, it was my starting point to getting back in shape after bloating from college, but now I only do lengthy cardio one day a week, as the rest of my workout program is rigorous enough, which is accompanied by a strict diet.
An increased amount of steady-state aerobic exercise eventually eats at your fat stores, and the next place it goes to is for muscle...the less muscle you have, the harder it is for your body to burn fat. Unless you're a trained marathon runner who is getting in the redonkulous amount of calories to sustain the constant calorie burning and unless you absolutely love distance running (few people I know do), I'd look into high intensity interval training, or other anaerobic programs. Aerobic is good to start if you've had a long layoff, and anaerobic is better for when you've accustomed to the aerobic demands and are ready to step it up; of course, specific training needs may say differently (say, if you are specifically training for a marathon or something of the like).
People do respond differently to different exercise programs though, so don't take that all as gospel. Both of you guys were right in different ways.
You're much more likely to have knee problems from being out of shape and over weight as opposed to running. When I interned with some orthopedists this summer I saw much more knee problems due to being overweight. Running does reduce the risk of osteoporosis and knee arthritis and IS good for you. Sure you may run into problems if you're anatomically or biomechanically dysfunctional or if you put in a lot of miles. Generally though if you use running as just one aspect of a fitness program you will likely be fine.
Also fuck treadmills, roads are much more interesting than being on a treadmill. I get way to bored and haven't lasted more than 10 minutes on one in a long time. Give me a good trail, regardless of the weather, and I can run forever.