go go power rangers!

It's their store, it's their decision.

This whole modern warfare thing is done to death now anyway... I miss WWII shooters.

Yeah, I said it.

And robots and stuff.

In the future we should resolve our differences with videogame matches. He who wins the match, wins the war!

Surely troops are too busy bombing schools and hospitals with drones to be playing video games anyway?

Right?

Has anyone tried the beta ? I don't care if you put cute babies versus old people bound to wheelchairs, if the gameplay sucks I never gonna buy it.

@djiminezgamer

I actually liked BC2, and I agree with you, this looks CTRL+C, CTRL+V, but this game feels crappier.

Didn't people around here bitch and whine about how stupid it was to call them Opposing Force?

Isn't... Isn't COD's faction (OpFor) the same? (OpFor = OPposing FORce)

But nobody bitches.

This is what happens when you promise something controversial and don't deliver. The customers you attract with it are turned off, and the ones you pissed off beforehand are still pissed off.

No matter how good or bad the move actually was.

If one word springs to mind at all, it's the word "retarded", and besides if people wanna buy it they can just go steam and gg.

Also, contrary to others opinions I like the multiplayer, it's pretty fun and feels like a nice mix of battlefield and cod4, which is only a great thing in my opinion

There are NO similarities except for the standard shooter stuff between BC2 and MoH.

MoH is more like Modern Shitfare.

It's difficult to find an accurate impression of this game.

You've got the "CoD is GoD" crew saying it's shit, because it's not CoD.
(bitch please)
You've got the hardcore Battlefield crew saying it's shit because it's not battlefield, some because it's too similar to Battlefield.
(durp)
You've got the "it's just CoD" crew saying it's shit because it is like CoD.
(durp durp the best selling, yet most generic game of all time has other games in the same genre that are similar? Really? Nevar!)

I want CoD (the core gameplay is fantastic, but the overlaying bullshit destroys all enjoyment of the game), but without the broken perks and stupid spiralling killstreaks. I want a CoD where you don't spawn in front of the enemy and you're not just doing laps of a tiny little map shooting people in the back. I LOVED Bad Company 1 & 2, but would really like a smaller, faster, more close and personal version of BC2 (although I do love the long range warfare of BC - OPTIONS!)

So is this game for me?

@fetus I'm the opposite, i'll play stacks of the mp (if it's good) and might blast through the sp once, eventually.

this stupid ignorant boycott from the US army is EMBARRASSING, and should be EMBARRASSING to every american gamer.

Does anybody actually ask the soldiers what they think? They're the people who are fucking risking their lives out there. If they want to play Medal of Honor let them do it.

Change it back right now. If you can't please them with Opfor then just sell it as it was supposed to be. I feel sorry for you Americans sometimes....

Dear US Military,

Please stop being afraid of what you don't understand and use logic. If you can't even see why a game about real-world events isn't a travesty, then I truly can't believe how the US's military can be the strongest military force in the world and yet be so lacking in common sense.

@Sexualchocolate: I know exactly what you mean, and sadly, MOH doesn't come close to what we want. The spawns are awful, camping is the most profitable strategy, teamwork is close to nill, killstreaks are overpowered at high levels and only encourage camping a hallway with an LMG. People die with only 2-3 shots, which encourages spraying and running&gunning rather than flanking and teamwork. Movement is clunky, lag is atrocious, ADS is less reliable than firing from the hip, etc. Don't get this for the MP. Stick with BC2 for the realistic emphasis or TF2 for the balance.

This is garbage. Just sell it. We all have the freedom of speech, or so I thought.

This doesn't surprise me considering that the reason bases weren't going to carry the game was somewhat different from the reason the entire military wasn't going to support the game.

Even if the name of the Taliban is changed in the game its not going to stop kids from going into the on base stores and doing what the bases fear they would: Asking mommy if that's where daddy is.

In my opinion the damage was done when it came out that there would be playable Taliban. The people who know the game for having Taliban in it, and have written it off because of that, aren't going to hooked back in. "Opposing Force" or not, no ones going to see them as any thing but Taliban and the game will be in Afghanistan no matter what they'd do to change it.

To anyone who's played the beta:

Do they have squads like in BF:BC2?

So first people in the military aren't allowed to be gay, and now they have restricted access to buying a video game? Yeah, they're showing a lot of respect to the troops...

...but would it make me a terrorist if I wanted to be a Master of the Universe instead of a Power Ranger?

I suppose it doesn't really matter. The dumbass Govt's definition of terrorist probably already includes me.

You know I really hope the different sides in the game aren't referred to by name. That would make this whole drama dumber than it has already become.

well i'm keeping the taliban in the game
MOH psn taliban_wins add me