games  anime  |  toys
Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Microsoft contemplating new way to nickel and dime people to death photo

In a misguided attempt to make PCs more affordable (or more likely a crafty attempt to squeeze money out of people), Microsoft has filed a patent for a "pay as you go" PC subscription system.

The basic idea is that you "build" a computer out of a set of parts, each with an associated cost, then Microsoft builds the computer, sends it to you, and you pay for it for every hour that you use it. While on the surface this might sound like a nice way to make PC gaming more affordable, when you crunch the numbers it ends up sounding kind of worthless.

The patent estimates a gaming PC would cost around $1.25 an hour (and we all know it will end up costing more than that). Assuming you use the computer for two hours a day (and I'm sure most of us use it much longer than that), you'll be spending $75 a month, or $900 a year. Considering that, if you search for deals, you can build a decent gaming PC for around $500/$600 and use it as much as you want, MS seems like they'll be ripping people off pretty hard.

The patent also mentions they may go with a flat rate pricing scheme that works for a set amount of time. Either way, anyone buying these is likely to get gouged.

If you want to get a gaming PC, build it yourself (it isn't as hard as it looks) or find someone who can do it for you. Spending $900 a year on a subpar machine would just be crazy.

[Via Cnet]


Continue: More PC stories





prev next

21 comments | showing # 1 to 21

Bigby's Avatar
Bigby at 12/30/2008 15:38
How the hell does this work? Is it based on time it's on? Do they just keep charging you indefinitely with no cap on it if it pays for it all eventually? So you don't even eventually own it you just pay forever? The hell crap is that? Is there a meter on the damn thing?
SnakeDude4Life's Avatar
SnakeDude4Life at 12/30/2008 15:39
What kind of economic dystopian society is Microsoft trying to make?

Blade Runner, anyone?

Corak's Avatar
Corak at 12/30/2008 15:41
Stupid way to nickel and dime people, but there is a sucker born every minute. I hope this doesn't catch on, but I have a feeling it might, people like "low" monthly anything. However it being Microsoft and Windows I fullly expect a way to hack it so you don't get charged to use it in 4...3...2...1...
galagabug 's Avatar
galagabug at 12/30/2008 15:44
are we sure this is interpreted properly? why would ms sell you hardware and then control system specs remotely? the odds of it being hacked wide open are next to impossible, you know like their OS. i've seen this other places and i think the patent request is being misinterpreted.
Zombutler's Avatar
Zombutler at 12/30/2008 15:45
PhazonYoshi's Avatar
PhazonYoshi at 12/30/2008 15:46
Step 1) Reformat, to remove whatever tracking software they use.
Step 2) Enjoy your free computer.
Niero's Avatar
Niero at 12/30/2008 15:50
WINDOWS 8 IS REVOLUTIONARY
Zombutler's Avatar
Zombutler at 12/30/2008 15:51
Step 3) Enjoy jail
whormongr's Avatar
whormongr at 12/30/2008 15:53
actually I think that MR ross has this a bit skewed- the word on the street is that this will be a cloud computing type system where you would use a terminal style log to access mainframe hardware, thus allowing you to say build a cluster or or compiling rig w/o purchasing the hardware, kind of similar to server hosting that most larger companies use nowadays only you wouldn't own or rent the dedicated hardware, just the rented specs and someone would admin it for you.
in general the idea that this would make sense to your average consumer is pretty stupid, companies would pay because it cuts the bottom line compared to their profits, but for your average consumer there is no profit
michiyoyoshiku's Avatar
michiyoyoshiku at 12/30/2008 16:06
once this happend magically millions soon start using macs
Qraze's Avatar
Qraze at 12/30/2008 16:14
bad idea but its the ms mentality. if they could charge you for every hour you use windows, they would.
Jonathan Ross's Avatar
Jonathan Ross at 12/30/2008 16:20
@whormongr Based on the language in the patent, it sounds like they're actually planning on selling individual machines with selectable performance levels. No mentions of clouds at all. Like GalagaBug mentioned, based on the patent language, it sounds like it's going to be "unlockable" performance. You can read the full patent here.

@Ron
They make it explicitly clear what it's intended for in the patent - they want to make computers "more accessible" to increase the revenue software developers will get from an expanded userbase. They also admit that the consumer will likely end up paying more than they normally would if they just bought a computer, but think it will be justified because the machines are "scalable" and you won't have to upgrade as often. The problem is is that it will probably be cheaper to upgrade.
CrocBox's Avatar
CrocBox at 12/30/2008 17:14
This is one of the dumbest ideas I have ever heard.
Holyetheline's Avatar
Holyetheline at 12/30/2008 17:32
Step 4) Rape
Guttlesswonder's Avatar
Guttlesswonder at 12/30/2008 17:38
Maybe this would work for something like a PC arcade, or whatever those places are were you can just rent a PC to play games and shit. Then your userbase would be paying for the PC's as they play per hour, and then you could upgrade massively every 6 months without the upfront cost of new hardware.

Then again I don't really know, its not like I would ever do this.
Mushman's Avatar
Mushman at 12/30/2008 18:22
Step 5) Gang rape
whormongr's Avatar
whormongr at 12/30/2008 19:44
@Jonathan Ross
this part of the patent says exactly what I was saying:

"The system 10 may include a number of pay-per-use computers, such as a first computer 12, a second computer 14, and a representative last computer 16. The computers may be connected over individual local access connections 18, 20, 22 to a wide area network 24, such as the Internet, and from there to a fulfillment center 26. "

also in the opening description:
An administrator may use a similar user interface to set performance levels for each computer in a network, allowing performance and cost to be set according to a user's requirements.

it seems that this is more intended for institutional use
whormongr's Avatar
whormongr at 12/30/2008 20:53
@Jonathan Ross
this part of the patent says exactly what I was saying:

"The system 10 may include a number of pay-per-use computers, such as a first computer 12, a second computer 14, and a representative last computer 16. The computers may be connected over individual local access connections 18, 20, 22 to a wide area network 24, such as the Internet, and from there to a fulfillment center 26. "

also in the opening description:
An administrator may use a similar user interface to set performance levels for each computer in a network, allowing performance and cost to be set according to a user's requirements.

it seems that this is more intended for institutional use
Jonathan Ross's Avatar
Jonathan Ross at 12/30/2008 20:53
@whormongr I saw that part, but I assumed it was more of a description of how MS would control people's computers rather than a cloud system. You may be right; the patent is rather vague. The reason I'm not entirely sure it's a cloud is because of them talking about people still having to upgrade the boxes; you just won't have to wait as long to upgrade.

I'm also not entirely sure about the institutional use. Certainly, it will be used that way, but it really seems like MS is targeting it towards the regular consumers. When they talk about the "typical consumer", they talk about things like graduation invitations, Christmas letters, and trips too and from school.

Regardless of how it's implemented, it'll be interesting to see where this goes.
brainderailment's Avatar
brainderailment at 12/30/2008 20:55
"Whoops, my computer had to download and install a service pack all night, there's another $30 down the drain."

Expect frequent unavoidable updates. Also, I don't ever want to use a computer that Microsoft manufactures.
leahzero's Avatar
leahzero at 01/01/2009 07:58
Calm down, Chicken Littles. Considering how cheap consumer-grade PC hardware is, and how prices are still falling, it's very unlikely that this will be aimed at the consumer market in any way. The guy who mentioned distributed computing for businesses (e.g. render farms) is on the right track.
prev next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 
New on Destructoid.TV play all videos

Loading
Loading Destructoid Videos




    Win this!
    Reminder: We're giving away six copies of Magnacarta 2!



    Dtoid Twitter    Got news?   tips@destructoid.com

    Reviews & Previews
    Mahjongg Artifacts 2 review
    Dragon Age: Origins review
    Lost Winds: The Winter of the Melodias review
    Osmos review
    Space Invaders Extreme 2 review
    Half-Minute Hero review
    JU-ON: The Grudge review
    Kenka Bancho: Badass Rumble review
    Thexder Neo review
    Domino Rally review
    more reviews
    PS3's 256-player MAG
    Rooms The Main Building
    Skate 3
    Hudson's bringing back the Bonk
    James Cameron's Avatar
    Bomberman Battlefest
    Calling
    Bad Company 2's multiplayer
    Partying like it's 1959 in BioShock 2's multiplayer
    BioShock 2 through the eyes of Big Daddy
    more previews


    - The Dtoid Army is 49594 strong -

    Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

    Call for entries: do the wrong thing

    New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide




     Originals
    Jim Sterling: How to respond to a videogame review





















    More Destructoid Originals




     Popular now more
























    Destructoid's editorial lovefest is:
    Nick Chester
    Editor-in-Chief
    Jim Sterling
    Reviews Editor
    Dale North
    News Editor
    Hamza Aziz
    Community Manager
    Anthony Burch
    Features Editor
    Rey Gutierrez
    Video editor & director
    Niero
    Founder, publisher
    Letters to the editors
    tips@destructoid.com
    Associate Editors
    Ashley Davis Jonathan Holmes
    Brad Nicholson Jonathan Ross
    Brad Rice Jordan Devore
    Chad Concelmo Matthew Razak
    Colette Bennett Tom Fronczak
    Conrad Zimmerman Topher Cantler
    Dyson Samit Sarkar
    Contributors
    Adam Dork
    Ben Perlee
    Daniel Lingen
    Joseph Leray
    Joe Burling
    Mikey
    Will Maddock
    Stella Wong





     

     
      get involved

    register or login
    post a blog
    post a forum
    enter a contest
    contribute a news tip
    suggest a feature
    be a guest editor
    support

    new member's guide
    login assistance
    tech support
    report abuse
    email our editors
    read our dev blog
    nuclear crisis?
    keep in touch

    RSS feed
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Myspace
    Flickr
    Game nights
    Meetup+play online
    seriously

    about Destructoid
    advertising
    terms of use
    privacy policy
    jobs at MM
    buy our crap
    our network

    Tomopop
    Japanator
    Despingation?




    Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
    living the dream since March 16, 2006