Is that really true? I'd like to see a source on this.
Then I've dealt with women in management who actually know their shit. The difference was not in the sexual organs on hand.
"if you read any books around women who have leadership roles in businesses, ultimately those businesses are doing better"
Is not doing anyone any favors, it just sounds biased and ignorant.
Leadership has nothing to do with individual ability now? Its a sex thing? Really Bradshaw?
All I hear is: "I haz faginass and likez dem games so iz good at beesness"
Seriously though after the recent uprising of sexism debates in gaming that really doesnt help as gender doesnt mean squat in business or really any other job/career...
http://www.20-first.com/9-0-better-bottom-line.html
... there have been various different studies that point to the hypothesis that corporate gender diversity isn't a bad thing for companies to consider.
... but I also agree that much of the recent feminist slant in the gaming industry is a bit tiresome. I'm a woman and what with everything going on in Afghanistan and various other countries it really seems incredibly trivial to be so uptight about the games industry - where women are free to play games, write about games, create games.
Wish they put more effort into making better games instead of pandering to minorities.
???
http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/173227/Opinion_Video_games_and_Male_Gaze__are_we_men_or_boys.php
You're reading it wrong. They're not talking sales figures or metacritic scores. They're talking perspectives:
"But I think you have a different perspective when you have a different mix behind the scenes, making the games and everything, and I think it can really open up different kind of innovations, different features, and different ways in which you design games too."
We're seeing a ton of the same games over and over, a new perspective can only be a good thing.
The point I'm trying to make is; mind your reaction and try not to "knee-jerk" the entire subject.
While a bit misguided, this Bradshaw is just trying to speak to is diversity. Criticize, disagree, speak your mind, but dont attack this one. Shes not coming after you, she doesn't (seem to) have a bullshit agenda, let speak and discuss. Please
I really need to get off my ass and write about this stuff too. I know you don't read comments much, but if you do you should know that I view you as a great source of inspiration and a fellow feminist! Keep it up! <3 <3 <3
It can't be helped.
@tuoman
Thanks for clarifying.
Well, i agree now, because new ideas are a good thing, even if most of them make shitty games.
The good kind of broader appeal, not the “Dead Space 3 is now a co-op action game” kind.
And while they're at it, avoid putting a fuckton of checkpoints and lowering the standard difficulty so even a monkey can beat a 60USD game in a weekend.
I guess you can talk to women about video games, you just can't have them writing about them.
Any way, I like how people are saying women, or diversity, or whatever is good for business. Sure, it is from an idea and thought process angle, but *business* itself a lifeless, made up, thing, exactly like you can say laws are.
No one thing is good or bad for business, its how they're applied and people perceive them that becomes the issue. Effectively nothing is "bad" for business, as does it not matter *who* is doing the business, at all until people become involved and inject their own opinions and belief systems to it. Again, just like law.
So, really, when you put distill it down to its basest form, it just comes out that PEOPLE are good for business, because otherwise business wouldn't exist in any form.
This is also exactly why different cultures clash so much, without the difference of opinion we'd surely be bland as shit as a species, but we also wouldn't be any different from the Japanese, or the people of the Middle East, or African people. culture is no different then business or law (specially since both of those things are directly influenced BY culture, most of the time), if you took out the human experience you'd be left with just another made up, amorphous, thing.
... and frankly, why should it matter? Every gamer would love to be paid to write about games or gain the status of an editor on a known gaming web site... it's sexist to think that women should be selected for these positions on the basis of their gender and not on the basis of their abilities. Most of the "feminist" voices on Dtoid seem to be men... while many of the women here just want to be treated as equals... as gamers (and for the most part, we are).
Anyone is free to write a blog here and if the blog is good it often gets promoted. There is no sexism, racism, homophobia or any other discrimination in blog promotions to the front page - Dtoid is one of the few sites that allows for that kind of voice - for any decent writer, male or female.
I apologize for my earlier comment.
That isn't really true. Diversity for the sake of diversity is often not a good thing. Losing track of that can be very bad for a business.
A friend of mine was given a corporate mandate to hire contractors based on minority status over quality of work because of a new diversity program. The scale went from Native American female at the top to white male at the bottom. He had no choice but to pass over his usual choices and contract a new group with female ownership. They ended up bringing in one of the old contractors to fix things at an even greater expense. The price tag for that project was over double what it should have been.
Diversity is good when all else is close to equal, but it's certainly no magic formula.
If we really want to get to a point in our society where we treat each other according to character alone then pushing stuff like "diversity" merely emphasizes differences that, ideally, aren't supposed to matter. We can't be against gender/racial discrimination and then advocate for something that clearly involves that same discrimination. A poor racial/gender history is not an excuse because it only takes a small sliver of human history into account and lays blind, blanket guilt on large groups of people.
Anyway, that's my long winded response. Oh, and one more thing, the majority of occupational deaths in this country happen to males. Maybe people should focus on that first when they feel the need to discuss to talk about work gender proportions.
We should allow diversity to...divsersify, however. We should let it run it's course; new ideas, new people, new cultures, allow them to enrich our own. Good for her. Games have become a bit boring lately, I'd love to see what new perspectives bring, if Portal is any indication.
To echo what others are saying, unless core gaming expands beyond a largely male demographic, a female perspective won't change much (or be particularly welcomed).
I call BS on that. The gaming industry is more welcoming to women than people think. Many studios have female executives and leadership roles now. Just not many that are actually creating or directing games yet but that'll change.
Oh, so close to a rational argument but then she had to throw this line out there. I'm trying to figure out how this is not a sexist thing to say considering she offers no actual proof of this.
Anyways, the proof is in the pudding. When more women ultimately join the gaming industry we will see if games sell better, because that's what's important to the industry after all. Quality of the product and consumer satisfaction were tossed out the window years ago.
So, a vagina makes a person a better corporate leader?
What's with all the misandry on Destructoid lately?
Sorry, that's a terrible question my irrational and violent penis made me ask. Also I'm obviously not very bright for not wholeheartedly agreeing with whatever women tell me the moment they finish speaking.
When will I learn? Oh, right, I'm male. Learning isn't one of my strong points.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow