@ DrXym

Maybe useful to do so... Especially "if" like rumors have it. They start making a HD Wii. That's backwards compatible w/ Original Wii Titles... Ahh Ha!

I think that Wii is doing great. Who gives an eff what this guy has to say?

Question, I whould like someone out there to remember the last Epic game that was made for Nintendo... anyone? Thats what I thought there has never been a game on a Nintendo console made by Epic. Why whould they start now.

@Jack

Never quite said that. Just that when people rate GTA & Gears as 'Mature' I smile a little at the irony. It may be unsuitable for youngsters, but mature? Not really.

@Johnny

It does look good and can only be good for the Wii and Nintendo. I'll reserve my judgement for when I try the game, but honestly it doesn't interest me on a personal level.

I'm with DanGale on this one. I've played GTA games before, and within minutes, I was frustrated by the control scheme (or lack thereof), and bored by killing hookers. If that's all there is to "mature" gaming, I'll be happy to stick with Nintendo -- as I've always since the mid 80's.

JACK is a funny and super cool man.

Because he uses the word "Pussy" in such a great manner makes him really cool.

Do you all realize that JACK is emotionally attached to his videogames? Do you all realize that he gets personally and psychologically offended when a game that he personally loves (as in a HUMAN BEING) gets dissed.

JACK, all this doesn't matter because this is all videogames, and will never fulfill that need in your life.

Besides, you come off as a twat.

Talk about narrow mindedness. Who says it has to be Unreal Engine 3.0? The simple fact is that if someone could actually make some worthy graphics engine that'll push the Wii (and not a supplanted PS2 engine), then maybe third-parties can actually make their games look better (and have them coincide with other tools that would help make the games play better). Games like Mario Galaxy pull off such an amazing display but typical third-party "support" (in general) would rather go with their usual self-defeating stance. "Oh Nintendo games are too good, we can't compete." "Oh Nintendo system buyers only buy Nintendo systems for Nintendo games only." "Oh, we can't put games like Metal Gear Solid on Nintendo systems because it's the kiddie demographic." "Oh it has a small user base." "Oh it has no online." "Oh it's not powerful enough." Oh please, spare me.

I'll bet if the Wii slowed down enough, third-parties would be be quick to jump off the bandwagon they never helped pull. But the PS3, oh they'll keep hacking at it just believing that it's what the future of videogames systems should be, Not saying i disagree on that, but the Wii's no slouch and contrary to shortsighted beliefs, you can get deep "hardcore" games with deep storylines and gameplay. Funny enough how the 360 and PS3 supporters would retort about how despite having traditional controllers, games for those systems could actually have new gameplay mechanics even against what the Wiimote could pull off. So how is it that the same people can't see past mini-games when it comes to the Wii? It's incredible and totally stupid how both sides of this fanboy war can use the same arguments when it suits them.

If Rein doesn't like the Wii then just say so. Don't give me this crap about this and that yet the PS2 just a few short years ago was everyone's wonderboy to whom they'd toll away even with its hard to program architecture (something the N64 got flak for) and made great visuals (okay sure not everyone made great visuals; some developers really are only capable of creating beautiful works when they've got more power while others can create games like MGS3, RE4, FFX, etc., but why is everyone so adamant to say the Wii's too weak?). I think people want to see what they want to see and if the Wii has a problem, it's a BIG problem, but if it's the PS3, pffft, nothing a band aid can't fix.