games  anime  |  toys
Destructoid is gaming news, community, videos, and sometimes love. Take the tour or jump in with Facebook:

 


Macintosh version of Spore really costs thousands of dollars photo

As most Macintosh owners may have realized, not many triple-A titles come to the platform. Although the lack of quantity of feature games has been the classic issue, many Macintosh enthusiasts have been excited about the prospect of sinking their teeth into Electronic Arts' Spore. Unfortunately, the Macintosh version of Spore costs more than just the retail price – it may cost you a brand new Macbook.

GhostRazor
has discovered that any Macbook made earlier than late 2007 is not capable of running Spore. It’s all intertwined with the rotunda of graphics cards that Apple has used over the last couple of years. Spore doesn’t support the GMA 950 card that most year-old Macbooks have. Instead, Spore only utilizes the fresh and beautiful GMA X3100.

This is a problem that I ran into after I upgraded from Tiger to Leopard expecting to be able to run Spore just fine. As you can see from this unfortunate message, Spore just doesn’t want to cooperate with me. The only option available to people like myself with a slightly older Macbook is to buy an entirely new Macbook, Macbook Pro, or iMac.

Maxis are already pursuing a very small user base by choosing to develop for the Macintosh platform, so why tighten the circle even further? Doesn't this seem a bit odd, or should I be upgrading my Mac every sixteen seconds so I can get the coolest Will Wright games?


Continue: More Spore stories





prev 50 comments
next

55 comments | showing # 51 to 55

PetiePal's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/09/2008 02:00
PetiePal
Just another reason Jobs should start recognizing that his newly found "populace" of devoted followers may want more than iTunes, Photoshop and iSight on their computers. There's no excuse for bs like this anymore if Apple really wants to succeed in the *long* run
munkee's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/09/2008 03:44
munkee
i really cant believe that the 'what is better? apple or mac' playground argument is STILL going on!?

get a grip!

no, a mac is no good for gaming. unless, you want to duel-boot. But then, lets face it, your back to windows. so, whats the point in having a mac?!

I have worked in various media studios. all of which use macs. not to show off... for stability and because windows uses far too many system resources just to keep it running!

my windows machine is great for gaming and demoscene.

my mac is great for visual and audio production.

neither is better than the other, but each does perticular jobs better!

let it rest
moggle's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/09/2008 15:02
moggle
I was being fucking facetious, assholes. Goddamn. Next time I'll spell it out for ya. Jesus H. Christ on a crutch.

Really, I could care less what you have for a computer. I don't care if you bugger yourself with your iBook because it feels oh-so-good, or you masturbate while looking at your nVidia SLI configuration nestled in your PC. Whatever.

But is it kinda shitty that Spore is not optimized to run on slightly older Macs? Of course it is. And for all you arguing that, 'Well, you have to upgrade sometime to play the new games,' that is the exact mindset that is absolutely wrong with the computer game industry. Games should be optimized for hardware that is not a few days old, but a few years old. It'd make a helluva difference to the consumer.
hood_954's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/09/2008 22:54
hood_954
LOLOLOLOL MACS R So0o0o0o0o0oo0o0 GAYY!! U CAN'T EVN DBL KLIK ICONS LOLOLOL FAGSFAGSFAGSFAGSFAGS
Blue Ryd3r's Avatar - Comment posted on 09/10/2008 18:58
Blue Ryd3r
This is why I am not a PC gamer. I don't have to purchase a new 360 every few months just to play a new game (Granted its been replaced 3 times but I didn't have to pay for any of those) I don't have to worry about configurations and the fact that my video card doesn't have a 'Q' in it name.

For fucks sake my laptop has a 128 mg memory, suports pixel shader 2.0, vertex shade 2.0, video transform light...a whole bunch of crap...but it's a mobile card (A radeon 200m)
And because its a mobile card it can't run any new games.
How is it that I have a very decent card with all the muscle and power of desktop models and yet can't run shit because the name of the card is different. Fie on that I say. Fie.
prev 50 comments next

Comment with Facebook





Click connect and comment instantly!

Comment with Dtoid





New? SIGN UP - it takes 5 seconds

Comments policy

Destructoid is an open discussion community. You don't need to "audition" to post a comment - just speak your mind. We respect differing opinions on the site, so have at it. Be smart, funny, insightful, clueless, or cute -- but back it up with substance. Keep your cool, keep it fun. We only ask that you act respectfully and above all: don't be a troll and ruin it for everyone else. Don't bring down gamers or we'll, you know, gently shoot you in the face and stuff you into a flaming mailbox. Each comment is your opportuntity to make this community awesomer. Is that even a word?

Avoiding the banhammer only requires common sense: spamming, trolling, racism, NSFW stuff, and other forms of sucking will not be tolerated. If anyone is griefing please report abuse. Be good. Don't suck!

 
New on Destructoid.TV play all videos

Loading
Loading Destructoid Videos


    Win this!
    Dive in! meetup+play for a chance to win a PC

    Dtoid Twitter    Got news?   tips@destructoid.com

    Reviews & Previews
    Assassin's Creed 2 review
    Crossfire Remote Pistol review
    Resident Evil: The Darkside Chronicles review
    Left 4 Dead 2 review
    Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Reflex review
    more reviews
    Driver
    Avatar
    GT Racing Motor Academy
    Bad Company 2 beta dishes out meaningful experiences
    Legend of Zelda Spirit Tracks
    more previews


    - The Dtoid Army is 51139 strong -

    Showing Cblogs with 3+ faps   show all

    Call for entries: do the wrong thing

    New to Dtoid? Read the survival guide




     Originals
    Joseph Leray: Revisited: Gears of War 2, Pinocchio, and masculinity





















    More Destructoid Originals




     Popular now more






















    Team Destructoid   tips@destructoid.com
    Nick Chester
    Editor-in-Chief
    Niero
    Founder, publisher
    Jim Sterling
    Reviews Editor
    Hamza Aziz
    Community Manager
    Dale North
    News Editor
    Rey Gutierrez
    Video editor & director
    Anthony Burch
    Features Editor
    Colette Bennett
    Tom Fronczak Brad Nicholson
    Ashley Davis Ben Perlee
    Conrad
    Zimmerman
    Chad Concelmo
    Jonathan Holmes Jonathan Ross
    Brad Rice Jordan Devore
    Will Maddock Matthew Razak
    Dyson Joseph Leray
    Topher Cantler Samit Sarkar
         
      Dexter
    Adam Dork
    Daniel Lingen
    Hollie Bennett
    Joe Burling
    Mikey
    Stella Wong

    Josh Tolentino




     

     
      get involved

    register or login
    post a blog
    post a forum
    enter a contest
    contribute a news tip
    suggest a feature
    be a guest editor
    support

    new member's guide
    login assistance
    tech support
    report abuse
    email our editors
    read our dev blog
    nuclear crisis?
    keep in touch

    RSS feed
    Twitter
    Facebook
    Myspace
    Flickr
    Game nights
    Meetup+play online
    seriously

    about Destructoid
    advertising
    terms of use
    privacy policy
    jobs at MM
    buy our crap
    our network

    Tomopop
    Japanator
    Despingation?




    Destructoid is an independently-run publication forged by our love of video games and the gaming community's need of accountable enthusiast press
    living the dream since March 16, 2006