I fully understand that anti-videogame enthusiasts (better known as rampant douche bags) are always hot to point out that videogames are to blame for any given crime, but now they're really reaching. Randy Gladden, an attorney defending the case of Mr. Andrew Reid Lackey, claims that his client's crime was spurred by the fact that he played videogames. Here's a direct snippet from the newspaper report:
Actions that led to a deadly confrontation between a defendant and an 80-year-old widower resembled a video game to the accused…
[Attorney] Gladden described Lackey (seen above) as a computer geek who had immersed himself in video games and lived in “a different world than you and I.”
Mr. Lackey killed an 80 year old man on Oct 31st, 2005. The victim, Charlie Newman, made a 911 call in which Lackey is clearly overheard saying "Where's the vault?" to the old man seven times throughout the course of the call. Newman's grandson had told Lackey that his grandfather kept a vault of money under the stairs, but no such thing was ever found. Videogames were never mentioned in the crime itself or the news report that followed.
These opinions are every person's right to have, even if they make you look even nuttier than the person you're trying to defend, but at least work with facts here, people. The least you can do is provide some sort of substantial evidence to base your claim on. Also, the deduction made suggests that all geeks are hunkering in their rooms waiting to murder the elderly, which only serves to make one assume Mr. Gladden has the IQ of a fruit salad.
You know, if we're going to go to war with people who judge us, you'd think they could send smart people. We're geeks for a reason, after all -- we've had our faces buried in books since grammar school. Being attacked poorly is only going to result in humiliation for these people if we are left to serve them up the facts.
[Via Gamepolitics]
Twinkie Defense
I'm sure HarrasmentPanda (sp?) can elaborate some more though, since he's in law.
But since video games are being used as a crutch in the same manner by the defense, it's kinda fits here.
Oh right HIS BALLS
(Please do not insert an inappropriate erection joke above. Thank you.)
Hopefully his lawyer gets a similar fate.
Also,
FRESH *SS LOOK!
But seriously, fuck this guy. Money is the clear motivator here, not the vidya games.
I want a vault
http://www.destructoid.com/bluewolf72-on-positive-gaming-30057.phtml
This Lawyer may not even feel this way about video games, however he probably appealed to the defense that in his mind would most likely get the defendant off.
He's going to be a total failure unless the jury is a bunch of retards. Which it is quite possible.
Nothing would make me laugh harder than a guy who becomes a lawyer because he thinks he's still playing Phoenix Wright.
If they do...shit. I've got a few people I'd like to off. I'll blame teh Haloz.
Joking (obviously). I hate when lawyers attempt to blame video games for their psychotic client's behavior. Can't be the fact that the person is mentally unstable, hell no! It has to be the games they play! Neglectful parents? Nope! Video Games!!
"He was such a nice boy until he started playing video games. Well, yes, before he started playing them, he did bury puppies up to their necks and then run them over with lawn mowers, but that was just a phase! It's those violent games that turned him into a monster!"
"Video games ma-"
"VIDEO GAMES YOU SAY! Baliff escort this man home. and give him a back rub for me."