I'm glad you continue to stick to that philosophy. I wish more people would understand it.
That said, the industry should be glad I'm not a reviewer. I would deliberately review used games exclusively and refuse to acknowledge the concept of online passes. I would thus be reviewing a damaged/crippled version and the final score would surely suffer as a result.
Because fuck them.
What we need are nimble independent developers that actually give a shit about the games they release, not big publishers who for the most part probably don't play games, probably don't like games and likely see them as little more than a cash cow investment.
And that year after year of self purported "record sales" don't seem sufficient to appease.
In any case looks like EA as usual which means another year of buying indie games instead of EA titles .... oh well :P
I mean, yeah, companies sometimes do really dumb shit -with- the online passes. Like having them expire, or having weird rules about when you can use them, etc. However, when that happens, bitch about the God damn dumb shit. Online passes in general aren't the tragedy you all make it out to be, and we need to focus our minimal influence on changing the aspects of it that are problematic.
As a hardcore PS2 gamer, I'll just continue to enjoy that system. I still have a few hundred games I still need to buy for the thing anyway.
I also want to buy another PS1 and rebuild my PS1 library, so I'll just the use the money I would have used to buy games like this before online passes were put in and use on those classic games instead.
I look forward to your review Jim, it mit help me decide
Screw it. I'll buy it used and then buy some kinda art book. I can't support online passes.
Yes I know some of you are bored so much and u decide to sell games but who cares? not me sorry.
If online pass causing problems when I start game fuck it, but in other case I don't care
...but then, because Kingdoms of Amalur didn't sell 10 billion copies, the dev team is immediately fired and EA continues to put online passes in their games. Vicious cycle.
can't tell if troll or serious.
But a real simple reply to that is people with principles who aren't going to put up with this inch and mile shit.
Also in before online passes start causing you trouble and you start to care but its too damn late to do anything about it because its now an indelible standard. The time for taking a stand on issues is generally when they are small and manageable not when they are corpulent and untenable. The problem there tho is often people find it easy to complacently accept a small inconvenience, ignoring obvious and impending ramifications looming just over the horizon.
tl:dr
If u don't want it to get to the point where online pass causing u game problems, u should care now not later.
Yeah, well you all can suck a shit. Welcome to the brave new world.
And the moral of that story is don't work for developers owned by EA. It is a sad cycle but they knew what they were getting into working for a company with that sort of track record.
After playing the demo I had already decided I wasn't going to pick this up right away. However, I may just skip it altogether just on principle.

Therefore, it's like you never even owned part of the game you supposedly purchase, it's like you have a right to rent a part of it for free once you buy it new. An odd sort of realization for me.
So to some it's not that the game itself is ruined, it's that people are sick of essentially being forced down these paths to get to something they want, when they have no logical reason of being there other than PROFIT.
Maybe we wouldn't see this so much if their was direct sales from publisher to consumer, and retailers didn't need to slip their hand into the equation.
It depends on how you look at it. You're making the assumption that a college paper (or a video game) starts at 100% out of the gate and "loses" points for any flaws.
However, Destructoid's method of scoring games (which I agree with) is more like games start at 0% and have to earn points. Jim doesn't "dock" points because the points weren't there to begin with. He gives points instead of taking them away.
And what do they care anyway? You could buy it and use the fucking box as a paper weight, and they still get their money. This is really just an attempt to crush used game sales. If people don't sell games, people can't get games used. Maybe if publishers just cut prices quicker, or made it easier to buy new games cheap, then people would be more likely to buy them new.
"I hate online passes as much as the next guy, but docking two points from a game simply because a publisher demanded an online pass is simply a dick move. "
Yeah, it is. Should be at least 5-8 off.
But eh, those parts probably aren't a big deal anyway. I hope not at least. It would be really short-sighted for publishers to start locking out the best parts.
So is including an online pass for a game that doesn't have online gameplay.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow


























follow











