Quick, somebody alert SexualChocolate, I don't want to miss his opinion on the matter!
To be honest I preferred a controller. So Move gets my vote of the motion control- nah I'm not buying either ....
NMH3 for the PS3 please.
However, the comparisons with Move are really off-base. Kinect is marketed as a new experience, while Move is marketed as an alternate controller system. With Move, the games themselves are still the stars of the show, so Move's success will be dependent on how well upcoming releases utilize that system. In simple terms, you buy Kinect games to augment the Kinect system, but you buy Move to augment the games you already want to play. It's a real difference in philosophy, and the reason Move didn't have a real launch event.
Hint: Multiple cameras make a huge difference. Try poking out one of your eyes if you need a demonstration.
One of the things Move might have going for it in the long run is that the PS3 could end up sharing multi-platform releases with both the 360 AND the Wii. This could potentially turn it into a very good value for households that plan to buy only one console.
You're right, the PlayStation Eye can't compare to Kinect. That's why you've got an actual control to use WITH the Eye, therefore immediately opening a world that Kinect can't touch.
That said, Kinect's tech on it's own IS impressive. But I'm willing to bet large sums of money that all million of those units sold were to people who buy stuff like Carnival Games on the Wii. It's a casual/beginner-only peripheral right now. Who know's if it'll change in the future, though.
Microsoft marketed the hell out of Kinect. The market bought the hell out of Kinect.
That's really all it comes down to. The games nor the technology have even the smallest amount of influence when compared to the marketing.
That being said? I just picked mine up today, and even having only played Kinect Adventures and the demo of Joy Ride, I'm pretty pleased with my purchase. I wanted Kinectimals and Dance Central, but I didn't want to blow over $200 only to find out I didn't enjoy the darn thing. Works well, does need a MINIMUM of 6 feet of space, the microphone is ridiculously good, and that breakout-style game in Kinect Adventures is super fun.
@sofik: There's heavy shortages of Kinect? Never heard anything of the sort, least not around here.
Also, Sports Champs was straight in the top part of the UK charts, while Kinnect games seem to be struggling, in the UK at least.
Suppose this comes down to what we were talking about yesterday, global appeal.
America is not THE WHOLE WORLD you know.
I'm looking at the top 20 UK sales the week move was released and am only seeing one that is a Move exclusive in a chart where Mafia 2 was number 3. Clearly Sports Champions chart position is due to the fact it was released at a time where the only new release was Halo Reach.
I am seeing 3 Kinect games in the top 20 where there are quite a few new releases like TFU2, Black Ops and New Vegas.
Also Europe isn't the whole world either.
However, I can't see it being good for anything except casual party games. Definitely can't see it working with the Xbox's bread and butter (first & third person shooters).
Happy to be proved wrong by some clever developers, but if they have ideas, they're currently holding them very close to their chests.
Also, one has REAL GAMES.
The problem with your logic is that you assume that Sony didn't have the money or initiative to push PS3 move like Microsoft did. My guess is that 500 million marketing for Sony Ericsson phone and PS3 Move won't see the sales figure which Microsoft enjoys.
It proves yet again how inept Sony is when it comes to execution of marketing, etc. Microsoft, regardless you like it or not, has very solid business model which helps putting hardware in place for developers.
I am interested in neither product at this point and they both seem retarded (Move more so than Kinect), but we will see how this will go in 6~9 months.
I'm pretty sure if you put Move on Oprah, and Ellen, and had justin fucking Beiber all over it, it would have sold to the exact same people who bought kinect.
People who don't even KNOW what they're buying, all they know is that Oprah and Ellen said it's good, and people seem to be having fun in the adverts!! Don't kid yourself, they're not buying it because "Oh, it's microsoft and they're a really reputable company!" - They're buying it because OPRAH SAID SO!
Thing is Sony has brought the move as an optional extra for those of us who already own a PS3, and as that, it's pretty awesome. - Sony are always trying to improve MY experience.
Whereas MS has brought kinect as "OH my God it's so cool, you casuals and Wii owners SOOOOOOOOO need this!!! Buy it now! You want it! look Oprah likes it, BUY IT!" - Microsoft don't give a shit about your experience, they've drained about all they can from your wallet and are going after new wallets now. They'll throw you a Halo and a Gears of War here and there to keep you paying, but that's about it, it's all about the casuals now.
It's like comparing DLC to a retail game, a casual retail game with the shit marketed out of it, to soccer moms and young children.
Sure, move won't sell as many units as Kinect, but in a years time when Kinect is "last Christmas' fad", Move will still be an optional control scheme for people who already have PS3's.
My brother is getting the Kinect (no idea why, it's not like Oprah, Ellen and Beiber told him to as we live in the UK.) and I haven't even heard him mentioning any interest in the Move because he may aswell just play his Wii.
To say the Move is "just like the Wii" is EXACTLY THE SAME MISCONCEPTION as "Kinect is just like the Eyetoy"
You seem to have avoided my first point, what make the Move an optional control scheme and Kinect anything but the same?
"We're treating Kinect as it's own, new platform"
Sony said something along the lines of...
"Move is not expected to sell millions right away, it's going to be a slow burner"
These have both been published on Dtoid, I'm not digging out links.
Both are optional, both are overrated and both are not being purchased by me.
Hence it's massive marketing budget, hence it's appeal to the non-xbox-core-audience.
Dude, both are selling as expected by their owning company. That's about all that matters. Well, if $500 mil marketing and 1 mil sales so far was MS's target...
You wouldn't see games like Sports Champions that require the Move to play if they weren't.
are you fuckin kidding me? What is this, the slim pickings of whats left from your big box of "comments on why kinect fails"?
Lets analyze that comment of yours:
"I'm pretty sure if you put Move on Oprah, and Ellen, and had justin fucking Beiber all over it, it would have sold to the exact same people who bought kinect."
Its a bird! Its a plane! Its captain obvious! Saving the world with common knowledge statements!
"People who don't even KNOW what they're buying, all they know is that Oprah and Ellen said it's good, and people seem to be having fun in the adverts!! Don't kid yourself, they're not buying it because "Oh, it's microsoft and they're a really reputable company!" - They're buying it because OPRAH SAID SO!"
...and people seem to be having fun in the adverts!!
But this part is the most hilarious:
"Thing is Sony has brought the move as an optional extra for those of us who already own a PS3, and as that, it's pretty awesome. - Sony are always trying to improve MY experience."
If you think for even a nanosecond that Sony created the move as a way to improve YOUR experience then you need to go check in to an asylum. Business knows no platform restrictions. It, like the kinect, was created as a way to turn a profit.
"Sure, move won't sell as many units as Kinect, but in a years time when Kinect is "last Christmas' fad", Move will still be an optional control scheme for people who already have PS3's."
This doesn't even make sense. Kinect is entirely optional too, and unless you are suggesting that they will suddenly go out of production in the next year they will still be an optional control scheme for people with 360s.
Now why is Kinect a 'different' platform?
Can you play ANY game that you already own with it? No? See, it's that easy. Sony extends games that are already released with Move support.
I still think that Kinect is a great device but except from Child of Eden I'm just seeing pathetic shitty games. I don't mind stupid party games. But when these games are nearly your whole line up MS did something wrong. Oh, and I don't like dancing in front of my tv too. It's even more pathetic than anything else. Don't even get me started.
You make a valid point. However, the ability for existing games to patch in kinect control schemes is still available to developers. It may seem to be an entirely different platform but the two can still be interconnected at a developers choice.
As for the lineup, you couldn't be more correct. Hopefully its just a slow adoption rate, but hey who knows.
Simple. It's unlike anything else that's out there.
Yes, there is a huge marketing push for Kinect, which is a key factor in driving awareness of it, but the sales come from it being different than what the Wii is.
How many times have we heard comparisons of Move to the Wii? More than enough. Yes, Move is more accurate. Yes, Move also uses a camera and mic. But to the average person (which is also the majority of people), if someone sees Move with the sub controller, they immediately think "Wii". This is the part Sony is struggling with. If all of those gamers already have a Wii, what is the incentive to go buy Move? Especially if they don't already own a PS3? It's pretty much a been-there-done-that sort of feeling, and no amount of Sony PR-spun posters is going to change that.
But there is nothing like Kinect. Yes, Move maybe able to do some motion capture stuff with the camera, but that's not how it's marketed. When people see Move, they see Wii. When people see Kinect, they see something that is unlike anything else that exists. That means millions of people are convincing themselves that it is something they need.
Like Joe Burling said: it's brand new.
Soccer Moms have had enough of waving a magic wand around: they want something completely new. Something that actually scans your *body* into a game like Your Shape: Fitness Evolved is like NOTHING out there on the market - watch videos of it!
People also claim that "The Move is the Kinect AND the Wii at the same time so it's better". Enh. Not true. The Eye Toy is really junk compared to the Kinect camera - you need to see the Kinect camera in action before you believe it. At the moment, the Eye Toy arbitrarily scans you into games and lets you interact like that horrible Kung Fu title: that technology has been around since the PS2. Scanning your bone structure and mapping you into a completely rendered object is something completely different.
Now I'm not saying the Kinect is better in every way. For most hardcore games, tactile feedback>>>no controller. Yet, Child of Eden looks incredible, as do many other hardcore Kinect titles. I guess we'll just have to wait and see if the Kinect allure wears of. But given how incredible the technology is, I doubt they'll screw that up.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow

















follow