They go beyond the limits of my imagination of how this 3D gaming will work.
Sure, something like Stardust where the whole game is on the screen from the same angle, little games like that, I get 3D being a cool little gimmick.
But regular games? Or Killzone 2?
With all the looking around and fast camera switches as well as the idea of wearing stupid glasses the whole time...well, maybe they figured it out and it'll blow our minds. But I've got a feeling we're looking at another "hey, people don't want rumble in their controllers anymore" level of smart moves.
Prove me wrong, Sony. I want to believe!

what the fuck is a qore?

And still, it is a horrible game :P

This 3d craze needs to stop. Bad enough every movie on earth is getting 3d the last thing I want is 3d gaming. One more graphical thing developers can waste time and money on rather than working on gameplay, story, and game length.

Hmmmm... I'll have to get downloading - cause I do like my Killzone 2! (though can't afford a 3D TV yet).

Dont' care. I lost epic Killzone 2 save file because my PS3 finally gave me a YLOD. I no longer buy games that have locked files.

@RonBurgandy2010: Keep on hoping because it looks like, in one form or another, it's here to stay. I'm still on the fence with 3D, especially as a guy who wears glasses already.

Well at least now the browns and begies can look even more drab.

Interesting

*Games or movies, I should've said in that last sentence.

@KalosBlue: I said I hated analog sticks when they came out. I eventually became used to them and even decent with them. But when a game gives me a choice between analog stick and directional pad, it's D-pad all the way.

But here's the fallacy in your argument: Analog sticks are the standard for game controllers. I don't believe 3D will ever be a "standard" from the perspective that it's expected that you will play nearly every new game in 3D the way you play nearly every new game with analog sticks today. I just don't forsee a mass adoption rate for what's essentially a visual gimmick that will require most users to spend money on an entirely new compatible display and accessories.

When (if? I still have doubts here too) the feature becomes standard on all televisions, then it has a shot. But they'll never make a mainstream, AAA title that's solely available in 3D because they don't want to reduce the customer base. So, unlike the analog sticks, 3D will forever be optional and therefore more likely to fail.

Killzone 2 probably has the best graphics on the PS3. It already looks great so I'm not sure it really needs it.

@Shadowiii
Uncharted 2 in 3D would be awesome, Killzone 2, ehhh

@ brainderailment

Why ruin it for others who actually are into that sort of thing? If you don't want to use the 3D feature, then don't. It's really that simple. I'm not all that into it myself, so I just don't use it. I'm not hoping it fails or is removed just because I don't like it personally. That's just selfish thinking.

@ Trevor McGee,

For now your logic is sound. Once it ceases to be an option (which is bound to happen) that argument won't hold water anymore.

I'll try (almost) anything once.

At first I thought 3D would be retarded, but when I thought about Killzone 3D now feels SLIGHTLY retarded. WANT?

^ So are girls. Check it out!

Those explosions and in 3D? Woooh baby!

Only Sony would embrace a tech that would further alienate them from mainstream success.

Obvious niche is obvious...NICHE