If you loosely used the meaning, Borderlands. It has adventure, and RPG elements. Genres are pretty loose fitting clothing, so I'd actually be *more* excited for an original Call of Duty game, and a chance to top Borderlands.
Also, Bioshock.
It certainly can work in first person, but I do have my doubts considering that Far Cry 2 sucked and Mirror's Edge is less about shooting and more about fast action platforming, which I did love.
Far Cry 2 is an awesome example.
And yea, I'd consider Mirror's Edge action adventure to some extent: there's nothing dictating you have to gain levels for the adventure element.
Also, SledgeHammer is a nobody and is unproven in the game yet so am I wrong in saying that no one cares if its an MMO for all anyone cares. Wait, that didn't make much sense. You know what I mean!
So perhaps it's a stretch, but I'm just saying that there's technically not enough information to declare that it "Will Be FPS". I think it'd be safer to say that it "Will Probably Be FPS" or "Will Almost Definitely Be FPS".
Meh...semantics.
Either it seems like people think Call Of Duty as a brand is just the same old thing and will be driven into the ground, yet anytime anything pops up that suggests anything being added or different from previous titles is looked at with dread and likely failure.
Jeez, have a little optimism till you AT LEAST get a preview. Sledgehammer might just inject some nuance, which was Infinity's weakness.
Whether it's baby steps or giant ones, if the trailer of Black Ops and talk about things here and there on Sledgehammer hold true, at least they're not just Modern Warfare rehashes. They're trying to keep it interesting, here's hoping they succeed. I don't see Activision handing over such an important brand for them to developers without strong ideas moving forward. Time will tell, but nine times out of ten change is good.

surf dtoid with 

Rising (10+)
People you follow
















follow