i bought the first one (pre ordered to boot)... what a mistake that was. Worst sixty five dollars i've spent.

Experience on a wide range of systems because they want them to be able to handle the game being in development for another 10 years.

Luckily, I built this bomb shelter for just such an occasion.
QUICK EVERYONE, GET IN

Seems to me like new talent is exactly what they need. Like, a lot of new talent.

Should be called:

"Three Human"

Too Human wasn't THAT bad. Sure it wasn't a great by any means, but it wasn't terrible. The controls were weird and the camera was just plain bad. The worst part of the game was the overbalance of the enemies. Every level you gained and every armor piece you got the enemies would level up to the same stats as you, making leveling up pointless.

I loved the whole Nordic-cyberpunk setting though. And hell, even some of the melee combat was fun.

Dont worry Jim. I'm sure it'll be a great game when it comes out for the X-Box 1800 and PS8.

Come on isometric Legacy of Kain...

@Arch649

I have to agree with u. I know a lot of people didnt like it but under the shit graphics and the pretty crap story telling and the menu /ui system *which looked like it was bolted on at the end while they were all on crack* was an alright game.

Actually i still play it with my mate every now and then. I think the reviews were right with what they said BUT there quite a bit of jumping on the bandwagon to say the game is shit cause eveyone else says so.

Shame really

I want to say something smart, but all I can say is:

Haha, seriously?

They should just call it 2 Human if it ends up existing. Too Human 2 is just too redundant to be saying all the time with all the different types of "two" that you can use.

I bought the first for £10 a while back and enjoyed it, but only because it was at the price i got it for, a second could be fun if they sorted out all the stuff wrong with the first

Too Human wasn't terrible but it also wasn't very good. I think the most obvious flaw it had were the obnoxious controls. I say "obnoxious" because...

"... what we're also seeing is for the people who don't like it, generally just don't get it. And it's because we've created something so innovative and different." (Denis Dyack, regarding the negative reaction to the XBLA demo, 2008.)

Taken from http://www.gamedaily.com/articles/news/dyack-too-human-haters-just-get-it/?biz=1.

It's not that we don't "get it", Mr Dyack. It's that it's a bit crap.

Oh, and the virtual reality stuff? Awful, just awful.

And to make things worse, it doesn't seem he's learned his lesson AT ALL:

"If games are to follow the trajectory of films, then the dominance of gameplay will diminish in place of an increased focus and importance on gaming’s stories and the ways in which they are told..." (Denis Dyack on why gameplay isn't everything, 2009)

Source: http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=24450

I mean, he's not talking total shit. I agree that graphics, music, dialogue, etc. can really contribute to telling a game's story. But what's the one ace-in-the-whole that gaming has and all other media he's mentioned doesn't? Gameplay. The fact that we are a part of the story, and shape it, is what gives video games the potential to do something different from films and literature. If you want to tell a story, you put the gameplay front and centre. Otherwise you may as well just direct a film or write a book.

Screw new talent. Give it to a new development team: Bioware, Bethesda?

Remember all that smack talk from the developer about Too Human going to be great? Where's he now? Probably eating some humble pie.

As someone who actually played this game and enjoyed it for what it was (a decent-playing action RPG with fun weapons and good enough story), I'm actually looking forward to this. The game ended on too much of a cliffhanger for there not to be a sequel.