I just recently downloaded the demo for Valkyria Chronicles and I really, really enjoy it. As I played it, however, I wondered: "Why hadn't I heard of this game before? Why did it take a particularly enthusiastic community blog to interest me in even downloading the demo?"
Then I realized -- it's the title. I read jkh13's blog because it didn't include the title of the game. I didn't even read Destructoid's own review because upon seeing the game's title, some part of my brain just shut down and told me it wasn't worth pursuing. Now that I've played and enjoyed the demo so much, I can't imagine how crappy my life as a gamer would have been had I not found it. I could remember feeling that way about a game only one other time.
That game, of course, was Steambot Chronicles.
Given that neither Steambot Chronicles nor Valkyria Chronicles have sold particularly well in the US, and given that I was completely unaware of them until someone else virtually grabbed me by my neck and screamed praises at the top of their lungs, I was forced to come to a single conclusion:
Putting the word "Chronicles" in your game's title -- especially if the game is Japanese, and especially if the other word is something confusingly specific like "Valkyria" or "Steambot" -- is a really, really, really bad idea.
Hit the jump, and I'll try to explain.
"Chronicles" is one of those words that gets bandied about far too often in bad science fiction novels, and worse videogames. While trying to figure out why the word "Chronicles" subconsciously stirs up such unbridled indifference, I found this article on GamesRadar, which helped clear some things up.
Tomb Raider Chronicles.
Sonic Chronicles: Dark Brotherhood.
Gunman Chronicles.
With very few exceptions (Chronicles of Riddick, Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles), it's almost as if "Chronicles" functions like a big, red neon sign, warning consumers that the game will be either a crap spinoff of an established series on its way down, or just a crap game in general. "Chronicles" is so goddamn overused that, at least in my case, I just tune it out completely when reading it or hearing it.
Not to mention, it doesn't really tell the consumer anything about the game. Game titles in general are still pretty abysmal, but they at least attempt to convey information from time to time.
"Left 4 Dead" sounds absolutely stupid, but it at least hints at four-player cooperation, and some sort of situation where dead things are involved.
"Mirror's Edge" sounds like the new razor from Schick, but its individual words have unique connotations that conjure up the image of something sleek, yet dangerous.
"Valkyria Chronicles" sounds like absolutely nothing at all. It sounds like cheap, irrelevant JRPG trash. It tells me absolutely nothing about what the game will be like. This is frankly moronic, considering the story of a goddamn WWII-esque war being fought with steampunk machines and technology, all visualized with beautiful pseudo-hand-drawn graphics is something that would very easily entice consumers if only the title were more descriptive in that direction.
However confused I might be by a game called "Awesomely Beautiful Animated Steam Tanks Fight Each Other In An Anime World War II Setting," I would, at the very least, have a hard time ignoring it. Instead, consumers are faced with a proper noun they have absolutely no reason to care about, followed by a completely empty and overused word.
And even though "Steambot Chronicles" is technically more descriptive than "Valkyria Chronicles" -- looking at the title, I at least understand that steam will be somehow involved -- it's not much better. I imagine big, stupid, epic situations involving giant robots and overdramatic protagonists when I hear "Steambot Chronicles." I think of a multi-part saga that lasts at least five games longer than it really has to. I don't think of a charming, incredibly nonlinear RPG where you can spend the majority of your time learning a musical instrument rather than fighting bandits in a bipedal robot.
Now, perhaps the vague and meaningless title was an intentional decision by the localization team (I can understand why you wouldn't want a title that made people think of charmingly unfocused gameplay where nobody ever dies and everyone is friendly), but it certainly didn't help sales all that much.
Perhaps I'm alone in this, but it's a real struggle for me to have any interest whatsoever in a game I've never heard of if something about it doesn't stand out. Usually, screenshots or trailers will do the trick, but if your game looks like a generic JRPG when shown in static photos (as is the case with most Valkyria and Steambot screenshots), then your title is going to have to do something more to get me interested.
I would have literally never even contemplated picking up Valkyria Chronicles had it not been for jkh13's community blog, and that's a goddamned shame. I'm happily winning an eBay auction for it as I type this, but I can't help but feel a little apprehensive and saddened by the fact that a single, poorly chosen word in a title almost kept me from experiencing something new and interesting.
So cut it out with the "Chronicles" shit already.
On the other hand, Chronicles of Narnia and supposedly Spiderwick Chronicles are very successful, maybe it should just be tagged to literature?
Though I understand Valkyria Chronicles, its a more manageable and shortened verson of the original Japanese title "Battlefield Valkyria: Gallian Chronicles".
Although, I adore this game almost beyond comparison, the title does have me kind of split.
The Gallian Front, the title of the book in the game, would have been a good alternative.
I'm also fine with "Awesomely Beautiful Animated Steam Tanks Fight Each Other In An Anime World War II Setting" but only if they add " This game requires you to use your brain and is not an FPS ". But that could have halved it's already paltry sales.
Agent MOO: Maximum Overdeath
(AMMO)
Acronym!
Colon!
Extreme Words, one being made up!
Also: the word Dark. Sonic Chronicles: the Dark Brotherhood and Dark Void are the only two titles I can think of off the top of my head that misuse it, but it seems like another overused word.
I guess I'm a strange guy, seeing as how I don't really care for the titles. Might be because english is my second language and it all sounds so awesome or maybe my brain's just fucked up.
I forgot where I read it but I hope this help the industry in abolishing the 4th quarter game blitz.
Like in sony's case. I bet you money that LBP and R2 would of sold MUCH better had they not been pitted against GOW2, Fallout3 and COD:WAW. I'm sure many would like to have all but at 60 bucks a pop, 2 titles now just cost you 120 bucks...thats some cheddar!!
Same goes with Dead Space and Mirrors Edge. As they had to go against all 5 of those titles. It makes me worry that good ips (like dead space!!) will not see futher development due to bad timing.
They should've just called it Battlefield Valkyria then, because that sounds good.....but, oh crap, forgot about EA's Battlefield series. They probably would've gotten sued.
Isn't EVERY roleplaying game a chronicle of events that happen in a story?
However, I don't let names get in the way of a good game.
However, I don't let names get in the way of a good game.
For the art work and look of these title I would have used something with Soldier, Army, Valkyre Warz, something a bit more appropriate to the look and feel.
So instead of hating on Japanese devs please hate on stupid American translators.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Steam Wars: Ultimate Tactical Warfield Undisclosure. You gotta have at least one made up word.
Now, this doesn't change anything about the quality of the game or its story, it only affects the marketing line.
Also, the game's suffered from bad marketing and timing. A niche release on the "loser" platform in one of the most crowded holiday seasons in history? In an economic slowdown? No wonder it lost out to Imagine: [Some Bullshit] and a raftload of sequels.
However, I still have faith that Sega will remain in their right minds regarding sequels to this and other quirky-but-unnoticed games. I mean, Yakuza 2 came here, and in better localization to boot (Japanese VA woo) despite its bottom-rung sales, so at least they're good at something besides wasting money and time on Sonic.
Anyone that would dismiss a game due the title is a douche.
I just wish I had a PS3. Or that Sega would port it to the PC or 360.
I don't really give a fuck what a game is called, unless it's referential to another game in a series. Anyone who would seriously tune a game out based on some kind of naming convention is a moron =/. I mean christ, The Witcher is one of the dumbest names for a game ever.
Game names need to establish a brand (El-Sveppi rightly noted that any game starting with the word "Battlefield" will get confused with the "Battlefield" series). Relying on cliche words muddles all the games into a generic series. Play one game with "Chronicles" in the title, you're gonna carry the title and the negative feeling together, so even though we're all aware this game has nothing to do with say, a Sonic game, in the sea of so many games the bad memory could be enough to prevent you from looking into new games with the same title.
Interesting stuff.
Final Fantasy is another prime example a name that doesn't mean what it says (once it did, but that time has long passed).
You do start reaching a bit, when you start going into western games as it happens less with them. Obviously, choosing a name for a new IP isn't easy, but I feel western devs go for a name that related what the player is experiencing more. Yeah, this name thing does need addressing, but it's been going on for years.
Anyway, like Wil Shakespeare said 'what's in a name?'. A name is a hook for us all to bite the bait. And if that doesn't work, there's reviews, previews, videos or good old word of mouth.
Some games look cool in pictures, or sound amazing on paper, but are god awful in the final release; Some games are just the opposite, they sounds boring or look terrible, but turn out to be the most amazing games out there.
Also, it wasn't until today that I had realised the title wasn't "Steamboat Chronicles" (passing one of the games over in the PSP's library).